Zhou Yiming, Gu Xiaodong, Xiang Jianbin, Qian Shiguang, Chen Zongyou
Department of General Surgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Exp Clin Transplant. 2010 Sep;8(3):245-9.
To compare the cuff technique to traditional suture technique in establishing cervical heart transplant model in mice.
Eighty transplants were performed by 1 surgeon, 40 using the cuff technique, and 40 using the suture technique, under the same circumstances.
The cuff approach was significantly superior to conventional suture anastomosis in higher surgical successful rate, less surgery, and less ischemic time (P < .05). Suture anastomosis required an intensive microsurgical training and at least a 16x surgical microscope, while the cuff anastomosis required less learning time and a 10x surgical microscope.
The cuff technique is the preferred method in cervical heart transplant model in mice.
在小鼠颈部心脏移植模型的建立中，比较套环技术与传统缝合技术。
由1名外科医生进行80例移植手术，在相同条件下，40例采用套环技术，40例采用缝合技术。
套环法在手术成功率更高、手术量更少以及缺血时间更短方面显著优于传统缝合吻合术（P < .05）。缝合吻合术需要强化显微外科训练以及至少一台16倍手术显微镜，而套环吻合术所需的学习时间更少且只需一台10倍手术显微镜。
套环技术是小鼠颈部心脏移植模型的首选方法。
