Vernillo Anthony Thomas, Wolpe Paul Root
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, NY 10010-4086, USA
J Can Dent Assoc. 2010;76:a51.
Major advances in the testing of oral fluid (e.g., saliva) may lead to the diagnosis and treatment of previously undiagnosed conditions and may enable dentists to manage oral disease more effectively. Such use of another body fluid, blood, is already well established. Blood is a complex tissue that has been extensively researched and is now used for a wide variety of diagnostic tests. It is also regarded as a form of property with ethical and legal dimensions. If saliva is to fulfill a similar role, it should perhaps be granted those same protections. This paper advances the concept that saliva should be considered a form of property, possibly within personal biological materials law. The emerging potential for the development of marketable products from oral fluids raises the issue of protecting the research participant's ethical and legal rights. In particular, violation of privacy and genetic discrimination may arise from the testing of salivary DNA. Respect for autonomy requires that the clinician inform a patient or research participant about his or her rights to property and privacy as these may pertain to oral fluid.
口腔液体(如唾液)检测方面的重大进展可能会带来对先前未确诊病症的诊断与治疗,并使牙医能够更有效地管理口腔疾病。对另一种体液——血液——的此类应用早已确立。血液是一种经过广泛研究的复杂组织,如今被用于各种各样的诊断测试。它也被视为一种具有伦理和法律层面的财产形式。如果唾液要发挥类似作用,或许应该给予其同样的保护。本文提出这样一个概念,即唾液或许应被视为一种财产形式,可能属于个人生物材料法的范畴。从口腔液体开发可销售产品的新兴潜力引发了保护研究参与者伦理和法律权利的问题。特别是,唾液DNA检测可能会导致隐私侵犯和基因歧视。尊重自主权要求临床医生告知患者或研究参与者其在财产和隐私方面的权利,因为这些权利可能与口腔液体有关。