Suppr超能文献

阅读随机打乱文本时的眼球运动。

Eye movements during reading of randomly shuffled text.

作者信息

Schad Daniel J, Nuthmann Antje, Engbert Ralf

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2010 Nov 23;50(23):2600-16. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.08.005. Epub 2010 Aug 16.

Abstract

In research on eye-movement control during reading, the importance of cognitive processes related to language comprehension relative to visuomotor aspects of saccade generation is the topic of an ongoing debate. Here we investigate various eye-movement measures during reading of randomly shuffled meaningless text as compared to normal meaningful text. To ensure processing of the material, readers were occasionally probed for words occurring in normal or shuffled text. For reading of shuffled text we observed longer fixation times, less word skippings, and more refixations than in normal reading. Shuffled-text reading further differed from normal reading in that low-frequency words were not overall fixated longer than high-frequency words. However, the frequency effect was present on long words, but was reversed for short words. Also, consistent with our prior research we found distinct experimental effects of spatially distributed processing over several words at a time, indicating how lexical word processing affected eye movements. Based on analyses of statistical linear mixed-effect models we argue that the results are compatible with the hypothesis that the perceptual span is more strongly modulated by foveal load in the shuffled reading task than in normal reading. Results are discussed in the context of computational models of reading.

摘要

在关于阅读过程中眼动控制的研究中,与扫视生成的视觉运动方面相比,与语言理解相关的认知过程的重要性是一个正在进行辩论的话题。在这里,我们研究了阅读随机打乱的无意义文本与正常有意义文本时的各种眼动指标。为了确保对材料的加工,会偶尔询问读者正常文本或打乱文本中出现的单词。与正常阅读相比,对于打乱文本的阅读,我们观察到注视时间更长、单词跳读更少以及回视更多。打乱文本阅读与正常阅读的进一步差异在于,低频词总体上并不比高频词注视时间更长。然而,频率效应在长单词上存在,但在短单词上则相反。此外,与我们之前的研究一致,我们发现一次对几个单词进行空间分布加工具有明显的实验效应,这表明词汇加工是如何影响眼动的。基于统计线性混合效应模型的分析,我们认为这些结果与以下假设相符:在打乱阅读任务中,中央凹负载对感知广度的调制比正常阅读中更强。将在阅读的计算模型背景下讨论这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验