Vos Ad C, Müller Thomas, Neubert Larissa, Voigt Christian C
IDT Biologika GmbH, Am Pharmapark, 06861 Dessau-Rosslau, Germany.
J Zoo Wildl Med. 2010 Mar;41(1):63-8. doi: 10.1638/2009-0103.1.
During serologic rabies surveys, bleeding is often difficult or almost impossible in small or endangered mammals such as bats. Therefore, the usefulness of an alternative, less invasive technique--that is, the use of blood-sucking reduviid bugs (Dipetalogaster maximus and Rhodnius prolixus)--was investigated. Bugs were used in combination with a conventional method (retro-orbitale bleeding) to obtain blood samples from the same individual NMRI-mice (Mus musculus) vaccinated against rabies. Rabies virus-neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers between paired blood samples obtained from the same mice were compared. The accuracy (between-method comparison), precision (repeatability of results), and robustness (influence of digestion on blood parameter) of the bug method was evaluated. VNA titers in the blood sample obtained from the bugs' crops were equivalent to those from samples collected directly from the mice. No differences between samples taken from different bugs that had fed on the same mouse were noted. In addition, there were no changes in VNA titers in blood samples collected from the triatomine bugs for up to 4 hr after completion of the blood meal. This study demonstrates that the application of blood-sucking bugs offers a validated alternative for obtaining blood samples to determine rabies virus-neutralizing antibody titers and is highly suitable for animals with limited or no accessibility of veins by conventional sampling techniques.
在血清学狂犬病调查中,对于蝙蝠等小型或濒危哺乳动物,采血往往困难甚至几乎不可能。因此,研究了一种侵入性较小的替代技术的实用性,即使用吸血猎蝽(大吸吮猎蝽和长红猎蝽)。将猎蝽与传统方法(眶后采血)结合使用,从接种狂犬病疫苗的同一只NMRI小鼠(小家鼠)身上采集血样。比较了从同一只小鼠采集的配对血样之间的狂犬病病毒中和抗体(VNA)滴度。评估了猎蝽法的准确性(方法间比较)、精密度(结果的可重复性)和稳健性(消化对血液参数的影响)。从猎蝽嗉囊获得的血样中的VNA滴度与直接从小鼠采集的血样中的滴度相当。未发现从以同一只小鼠为食的不同猎蝽采集的样本之间存在差异。此外,吸血后长达4小时,从锥蝽采集的血样中的VNA滴度没有变化。这项研究表明,使用吸血猎蝽为获取血样以测定狂犬病病毒中和抗体滴度提供了一种经过验证的替代方法,非常适合那些通过传统采样技术难以或无法获取静脉血的动物。