Voigt Christian C, Peschel Ulrike, Wibbelt Gudrun, Frölich Kai
Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Alfred-Kowalke-Str. 17, 10315 Berlin, Germany.
J Wildl Dis. 2006 Apr;42(2):466-9. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-42.2.466.
The collection of blood samples for serological studies is often stressful for the focus animal. Recently, the use of bloodsucking bugs, such as Dipetalogaster maximus or Triatoma infestans (Reduviidae; Triatominae; Heteroptera), has been suggested as a new and less invasive method for blood collection. To evaluate this technique, we collected paired blood samples from 20 domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) during a study of rabbit hemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV). For each rabbit, blood samples were collected by the conventional method (needle and syringe from the vena auricularis) and through feeding by D. maximus. Samples were tested for RHDV antibodies using standard test kits at three different dilutions. Antibody titers were identical for 56 paired samples and differed in only four cases. The simple matching indices were 1 for the 1:10 dilution and 0.9 for the 1:100 and 1:1000 dilutions. The major advantages of the new technique are 1) the possibility to obtain blood from animals where veins are inaccessible and 2) the fact that anesthesia of focus animals may not be necessary.
采集血样用于血清学研究对目标动物来说往往很有压力。最近,有人建议使用吸血昆虫,如大吸血蝽或克氏锥蝽(猎蝽科;锥蝽亚科;半翅目),作为一种新的、侵入性较小的采血方法。为了评估这项技术,我们在一项关于兔出血性疾病病毒(RHDV)的研究中,从20只家兔(穴兔)身上采集了配对的血样。对于每只兔子,血样通过传统方法(从耳静脉用针头和注射器)以及通过大吸血蝽吸食来采集。使用标准检测试剂盒在三种不同稀释度下对样本进行RHDV抗体检测。56对样本的抗体滴度相同,仅在4例中有所不同。1:10稀释度下的简单匹配指数为1,1:100和1:1000稀释度下为0.9。这项新技术的主要优点是:1)能够从静脉难以触及的动物身上获取血液;2)可能无需对目标动物进行麻醉。