Suppr超能文献

现场时间和重症监护干预的航空医疗后送服务。

On-scene times and critical care interventions for an aeromedical retrieval service.

机构信息

Emergency Medical Retrieval Service, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2011 Jul;28(7):623-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2010.091421. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Emergency Medical Retrieval Service (EMRS) provides an aeromedical retrieval service to remote and rural communities. Most of these facilities are unable to deliver Critical Care Interventions (CCI). CCI are delivered by the EMRS team prior to transfer of the patient to definitive care. This study addresses correlation between total on-scene times (TOST) and level of intervention delivered, and whether there is any variation in TOST between medical and trauma emergencies.

METHODS

Prospective data were collected on EMRS secondary retrievals over a 5-year period from GP-led facilities. Data were collected on the CCI undertaken by EMRS during TOST prior to transfer of the patient. Interventions undertaken were scored using TISS-76. Correlation was analysed using Spearman's coefficient and differences between groups analysed using Mann-Whitney tests. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.01.

RESULTS

EMRS retrieved 308 patients suitable for inclusion. Complete data were available for 97% of patients (n=300). Underlying diagnosis was trauma in 26% (n=72) and medical in 74% (n=228). There was a significant correlation between TOST and TISS-76 for all EMRS patients. Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation was (ρ)=0.616 with p<0.0001. The median TOST for the medical group was 60 min and for the trauma group 60 min (point estimate for difference 0 min, 95% CI 10 to 10, p=0.951).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a significant relationship between TOST on-scene by the retrieval team and the level of intervention delivered to patients. The present data do not support the assertion that there is a difference in TOST for medical and trauma patients.

摘要

背景

紧急医疗救援服务(EMRS)为偏远和农村社区提供航空医疗救援服务。这些设施中的大多数都无法提供关键护理干预(CCI)。CCI 在将患者转移到确定性治疗之前,由 EMRS 团队提供。本研究探讨了总现场时间(TOST)与所提供干预水平之间的相关性,以及 EMRS 在处理医疗和创伤紧急情况时,TOST 是否存在差异。

方法

对 5 年来由全科医生主导的设施进行的 EMRS 二次检索进行了前瞻性数据收集。数据收集了 EMRS 在将患者转移前的 TOST 期间进行的 CCI。使用 TISS-76 对所进行的干预进行评分。使用 Spearman 系数分析相关性,使用 Mann-Whitney 检验分析组间差异。统计学意义定义为 p<0.01。

结果

EMRS 检索了 308 名适合纳入的患者。97%的患者(n=300)的数据完整。基础诊断为创伤 26%(n=72),医学 74%(n=228)。所有 EMRS 患者的 TOST 与 TISS-76 之间存在显著相关性。Spearman 等级相关系数(ρ)为 0.616,p<0.0001。医学组的中位数 TOST 为 60 分钟,创伤组为 60 分钟(差值的点估计为 0 分钟,95%CI 为 10 至 10,p=0.951)。

结论

本研究表明,检索团队在现场的 TOST 与向患者提供的干预水平之间存在显著关系。目前的数据不支持医疗和创伤患者的 TOST 存在差异的说法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验