Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2010 Oct;87(4):314-23. doi: 10.1007/s00223-010-9405-9. Epub 2010 Aug 20.
High-resolution quantitative computerized tomography permits evaluation of site specific differences in bone architecture. The purpose of this study was to compare bone architecture between distal radius and distal tibia. We present bone architecture at the distal radius and distal tibia in 151 male and 172 female participants, as follows: total bone area (mm(2)), total bone density (mg HA/cm(3)), trabecular bone density (mg HA/cm(3)), cortical bone density (mg HA/cm(3)), cortical thickness (μm), trabecular number (1/mm), trabecular thickness (μm), and trabecular separation (μm). We evaluated differences in and correlations between bone variables (absolute values) across sites. We calculated individual z scores and used regression to assess discordance between sites. In pubertal and postpubertal male and female participants, absolute values of total bone area, cortical bone density, cortical thickness, and trabecular thickness were significantly lower at the radius compared with the tibia (P < 0.01). Absolute values for trabecular bone density were significantly lower at the radius compared with the tibia in postpubertal male and female participants (P < 0.01). Absolute values for trabecular separation was significantly lower at the radius compared with the tibia in pubertal female participants (P < 0.01). Bone architecture was moderately to highly correlated between sites (r = 0.34-0.85). There was discordance between z scores at the radius and tibia within male participants (pubertal R (2) between 36 and 64%; postpubertal R (2) between 22 and 77%) and female participants (pubertal R (2) between 10 and 44%; postpubertal R (2) between 25 and 62%). In conclusion, it is vital to evaluate bone architecture at the specific skeletal site of interest.
高分辨率定量计算机断层扫描可评估骨结构的特定部位差异。本研究的目的是比较桡骨远端和胫骨远端的骨结构。我们在 151 名男性和 172 名女性参与者中呈现了桡骨远端和胫骨远端的骨结构:总骨面积(mm(2))、总骨密度(mg HA/cm(3))、小梁骨密度(mg HA/cm(3))、皮质骨密度(mg HA/cm(3))、皮质厚度(μm)、小梁数(1/mm)、小梁厚度(μm)和小梁分离度(μm)。我们评估了骨变量(绝对值)在不同部位的差异和相关性。我们计算了个体 z 分数,并使用回归评估了部位之间的差异。在青春期和青春期后的男性和女性参与者中,桡骨的总骨面积、皮质骨密度、皮质厚度和小梁厚度的绝对值明显低于胫骨(P<0.01)。青春期后男性和女性参与者的桡骨小梁骨密度的绝对值明显低于胫骨(P<0.01)。青春期女性参与者的桡骨小梁分离度的绝对值明显低于胫骨(P<0.01)。骨结构在不同部位之间具有中度至高度相关性(r=0.34-0.85)。男性参与者(青春期 R(2)为 36%-64%;青春期后 R(2)为 22%-77%)和女性参与者(青春期 R(2)为 10%-44%;青春期后 R(2)为 25%-62%)桡骨和胫骨的 z 分数之间存在差异。总之,评估特定骨骼部位的骨结构至关重要。