• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

婴儿语音噪声辨别阈值的信度和效度

Reliability and validity of infant speech-sound discrimination-in-noise thresholds.

作者信息

Nozza R J, Miller S L, Rossman R N, Bond L C

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):643-50. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3403.643.

DOI:10.1044/jshr.3403.643
PMID:2072689
Abstract

Infants were tested on a speech-sound discrimination-in-noise task using the visual reinforcement infant speech discrimination (VRISD) procedure with an adaptive (up-down) threshold protocol. An adult control group was tested using the same stimuli and apparatus. The speech sounds were synthetic magnitude of ba and magnitude of ga. The masker was band-passed presented continuously at 48 dB SPL. Test-retest reliability was good for both groups, although test-retest differences were smaller for adults. For infants the mean of the absolute values of the differences between tests was only 5.2 dB, and there was less than a 10-dB difference between the two tests of 14 (87.5%) of the 16 infants completing the study. The infant-adult difference in discrimination threshold in noise was 6.9 dB, which agrees well with detection-in-noise thresholds from earlier studies and with discrimination-in-noise thresholds obtained on a subset of subjects in our earlier work. Advantages of the adaptive threshold procedure and its possible applications both in research studies and in the clinic are discussed.

摘要

使用视觉强化婴儿语音辨别(VRISD)程序和自适应(上下)阈值协议,对婴儿进行了噪声中语音辨别任务测试。使用相同的刺激物和设备对一个成人对照组进行了测试。语音是“ba”的合成强度和“ga”的合成强度。掩蔽音以48 dB SPL的声压级连续带通呈现。两组的重测信度都很好,不过成人的重测差异较小。对于婴儿,两次测试之间差异绝对值的平均值仅为5.2 dB,在完成研究的16名婴儿中,有14名(87.5%)两次测试之间的差异小于10 dB。婴儿和成人在噪声中辨别阈值的差异为6.9 dB,这与早期研究中的噪声检测阈值以及我们早期工作中一部分受试者获得的噪声辨别阈值非常吻合。文中讨论了自适应阈值程序的优点及其在研究和临床中的可能应用。

相似文献

1
Reliability and validity of infant speech-sound discrimination-in-noise thresholds.婴儿语音噪声辨别阈值的信度和效度
J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Jun;34(3):643-50. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3403.643.
2
Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs.
Audiology. 1991;30(2):102-12. doi: 10.3109/00206099109072875.
3
A procedure for measuring auditory and audio-visual speech-reception thresholds for sentences in noise: rationale, evaluation, and recommendations for use.一种测量噪声环境中句子的听觉和视听言语接受阈值的程序:原理、评估及使用建议。
Br J Audiol. 1990 Feb;24(1):29-43. doi: 10.3109/03005369009077840.
4
Some aspects of methodology in speech audiometry.言语测听法中的一些方法学方面
Scand Audiol Suppl. 1984;21:1-25.
5
Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.噪声中的语音识别:估计基底膜反应中压缩非线性的影响。
Ear Hear. 2007 Sep;28(5):682-93. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31812f7156.
6
Infant speech-sound discrimination in noise.婴儿在噪声环境中的语音辨别能力。
J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Jan;87(1):339-50. doi: 10.1121/1.399301.
7
Evaluation of an internet-based speech-in-noise screening test for school-age children.一项针对学龄儿童的基于互联网的噪声中言语筛查测试的评估
Int J Audiol. 2017 Dec;56(12):967-975. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2017.1378932. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
8
Improving the reliability of testing the speech reception threshold for sentences.提高句子言语接受阈测试的可靠性。
Audiology. 1979 Jan-Feb;18(1):43-52. doi: 10.3109/00206097909072618.
9
Investigation of a matrix sentence test in noise: reproducibility and discrimination function in cochlear implant patients.噪声环境下矩阵句子测试的研究:人工耳蜗植入患者的可重复性和辨别功能
Int J Audiol. 2014 Dec;53(12):895-902. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2014.938368. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
10
Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing: Sound Field Normative Data for BabyBio, BKB-SIN, and QuickSIN.听力正常儿童的言语理解:BabyBio、BKB-SIN和QuickSIN的声场标准数据。
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Feb;37(2):e50-5. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000907.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Phoneme Discrimination in the Variability of Speech and Language Outcomes Among Children with Hearing Loss.音素辨别在听力损失儿童言语和语言结果变异性中的作用。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 6;15(8):1072. doi: 10.3390/bs15081072.
2
Speech Discrimination in Infancy Predicts Language Outcomes at 30 Months for Both Children with Normal Hearing and Those with Hearing Differences.婴儿期的言语辨别能力可预测听力正常儿童和听力有差异儿童30个月时的语言发展结果。
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 30;11(19):5821. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195821.
3
Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.
儿童对退化听觉信号的句法解析和句子理解。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2022 Feb;151(2):699. doi: 10.1121/10.0009271.
4
Relationship between Behavioral Infant Speech Perception and Hearing Age for Children with Hearing Loss.听力损失儿童的婴儿行为言语感知与听力年龄之间的关系。
J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 30;10(19):4566. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194566.
5
Infant behaviors and maternal parenting practices: Short-term reliability assessments.婴儿行为和母亲育儿行为:短期信度评估。
Infant Behav Dev. 2020 Feb;58:101408. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2019.101408. Epub 2019 Dec 9.
6
Refining Stimulus Parameters in Assessing Infant Speech Perception Using Visual Reinforcement Infant Speech Discrimination in Infants with and without Hearing Loss: Presentation Level.在评估婴儿言语感知时优化刺激参数:使用视觉强化法对有听力损失和无听力损失婴儿进行言语辨别:呈现水平
J Am Acad Audiol. 2018 Oct;29(9):847-854. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17061.
7
Masked Speech Perception Thresholds in Infants, Children, and Adults.婴儿、儿童和成人的掩蔽言语感知阈值
Ear Hear. 2016 May-Jun;37(3):345-53. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000270.
8
Refining Stimulus Parameters in Assessing Infant Speech Perception Using Visual Reinforcement Infant Speech Discrimination: Sensation Level.在使用视觉强化婴儿语音辨别法评估婴儿语音感知时优化刺激参数:感觉水平
J Am Acad Audiol. 2015 Nov-Dec;26(10):807-14. doi: 10.3766/jaaa.14093.
9
The Desired Sensation Level multistage input/output algorithm.期望感觉水平多级输入/输出算法。
Trends Amplif. 2005;9(4):159-97. doi: 10.1177/108471380500900403.
10
The cocktail party effect in infants.婴儿的鸡尾酒会效应。
Percept Psychophys. 1996 Nov;58(8):1145-56. doi: 10.3758/bf03207548.