• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行人保护的优先级——严重伤害和汽车来源的实际研究。

Priorities of pedestrian protection--a real-life study of severe injuries and car sources.

机构信息

Division of Intervention and Implementation Research, Department of Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1672-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 May 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.006
PMID:20728616
Abstract

The aim of this study was to aid the optimisation of future, vehicle based, pedestrian injury countermeasures. The German In-Depth Accident Study (GIDAS) database was queried for pedestrians impacted by the front of a passenger car or van. A total of 1030 cases from 1998 to 2008 were studied including 161 severely (AIS3+) injured pedestrians. Considering the severe injuries, the most frequent injury mechanisms were "leg-to-front end", "head-to-windscreen area", "chest-to-bonnet area", and "chest-to-windscreen area". For children, a "head-to-bonnet area" impact was the second most common source of injury. With safety systems targeting these five injury mechanisms, 73% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65-81%) of the severely injured pedestrians would be provided protection from all of their vehicle-induced severe injuries. Omitting the windscreen area, this figure is decreased to 44% (CI, 36-53%). Furthermore, 31% of the surviving pedestrians were estimated to sustain a permanent medical impairment at any level. For more severe impairment, head was the dominating body region. The study shows that when developing countermeasures for the windscreen area to mitigate head injuries, attention should be paid to the structural parts of the windscreen area with a special focus on brain injuries. Finally, the incidence and risk of severe injury were derived as functions of impact speed for different body regions and injury sources.

摘要

本研究旨在为未来基于车辆的行人伤害对策提供优化建议。对德国深入事故研究(GIDAS)数据库中 1998 年至 2008 年期间被乘用车或厢式车前部撞击的行人进行了查询。共研究了 1030 例病例,其中 161 例行人受重伤(AIS3+)。考虑到严重伤害,最常见的损伤机制为“腿部与前部”、“头部与挡风玻璃区域”、“胸部与发动机罩区域”和“胸部与挡风玻璃区域”。对于儿童,“头部与发动机罩区域”的撞击是第二常见的受伤来源。针对这五个损伤机制的安全系统,73%(95%置信区间[CI],65-81%)的重伤行人将免受所有与车辆相关的严重伤害。如果不包括挡风玻璃区域,则这一比例降至 44%(CI,36-53%)。此外,估计有 31%的幸存行人在任何级别都存在永久性医疗损伤。对于更严重的损伤,头部是主要的身体区域。研究表明,在开发用于减轻头部伤害的挡风玻璃区域对策时,应注意挡风玻璃区域的结构部件,并特别关注脑损伤。最后,根据不同身体部位和损伤源的碰撞速度,得出了严重伤害发生率和风险的函数。

相似文献

1
Priorities of pedestrian protection--a real-life study of severe injuries and car sources.行人保护的优先级——严重伤害和汽车来源的实际研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1672-81. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.04.006. Epub 2010 May 15.
2
Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?行人子系统测试是否改善了乘用车前部形状?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
3
The influence of passenger car front shape on pedestrian injury risk observed from German in-depth accident data.从德国深度事故数据观察乘用车前部形状对行人受伤风险的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:11-21. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
4
Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking.自动驾驶车辆自动制动以减轻行人伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1949-57. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
5
An investigation on the head injuries of adult pedestrians by passenger cars in China.中国轿车对成人行人头部伤害的调查。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(7):712-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.752574.
6
Logistic regression analysis of pedestrian casualty risk in passenger vehicle collisions in China.中国乘用车碰撞中行人伤亡风险的 logistic 回归分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Jul;42(4):987-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.006. Epub 2010 Feb 6.
7
Factors affecting anatomical region of injury, severity, and mortality for road trauma in a high-income developing country: lessons for prevention.影响高收入发展中国家道路创伤损伤部位、严重程度和死亡率的因素:预防的教训。
Injury. 2009 Jul;40(7):703-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
8
Protection of children restrained in child safety seats in side impact crashes.侧面碰撞事故中儿童安全座椅内儿童的保护。
J Trauma. 2010 Oct;69(4):913-23. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e883f9.
9
Safer passenger car front shapes for pedestrians: A computational approach to reduce overall pedestrian injury risk in realistic impact scenarios.更安全的行人乘用车前部形状:一种在现实碰撞场景中降低行人整体受伤风险的计算方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Mar;100:97-110. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
10
A study of adult pedestrian head impact conditions and injury risks in passenger car collisions based on real-world accident data.基于实际事故数据的乘用车碰撞中成人行人头部碰撞情况和损伤风险研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(6):639-46. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.733841.

引用本文的文献

1
Risk of permanent medical impairment after road traffic crashes: A systematic review.道路交通事故后永久性医疗损伤的风险:系统评价。
Chin J Traumatol. 2023 Sep;26(5):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
2
Kinetic and Kinematic Features of Pedestrian Avoidance Behavior in Motor Vehicle Conflicts.机动车冲突中行人避险行为的动力学和运动学特征
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 25;9:783003. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.783003. eCollection 2021.
3
Why more male pedestrians die in vehicle-pedestrian collisions than female pedestrians: a decompositional analysis.
为什么在车-行人碰撞中男性行人的死亡人数多于女性行人:一项分解分析。
Inj Prev. 2013 Aug;19(4):227-31. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040594. Epub 2012 Nov 29.
4
Fatal Vehicle-to-Bicyclist Crashes in Sweden - an In-Depth Study of injuries and vehicle sources.瑞典致命的汽车与自行车碰撞事故——对伤害情况和车辆来源的深入研究
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2012;56:25-30.
5
Pedestrian injury patterns according to car and casualty characteristics in france.法国行人损伤模式与汽车及伤亡特征的关系
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2011;55:137-46.