Hasselt University--Transportation Research Institute, Wetenschapspark 5 Bus 6, 3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1966-73. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.001. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
The severity of 1491 crashes on 148 roundabouts in Flanders-Belgium was examined in order to investigate which factors might explain the severity of crashes or injuries and to relate these factors to the existing knowledge about contributing factors for injury severity in traffic. Logistic regression and hierarchical binomial logistic regression techniques were used. A clear externality of risk appeared to be present in the sense that vulnerable road user groups (pedestrians, bicyclists, moped riders and motorcyclists) are more severely affected than others. Fatalities or serious injuries in multiple-vehicle crashes for drivers of four-wheel vehicles are much rarer. Injury severity increases with higher age. Crashes at night and crashes outside built-up areas are more severe. Single-vehicle crashes seem to have more severe outcomes than multiple-vehicle crashes. However, systematic differences in the reporting rate of crashes are likely to exist and may have affected the stated results. Correlations with important, but unobserved variables like the impact speeds in the crashes might exist as well and could provide an alternative explanation for some results.
为了研究哪些因素可能解释事故的严重程度或受伤程度,并将这些因素与关于交通伤害严重程度的现有知识联系起来,对 1491 起在比利时弗兰德斯的 148 个环岛处发生的事故进行了严重程度分析。使用了逻辑回归和分层二项逻辑回归技术。从某种意义上说,似乎存在明显的外部风险,弱势道路使用者群体(行人和骑自行车的人、骑轻便摩托车的人和骑摩托车的人)比其他人受到更严重的影响。四轮车辆驾驶员的多车事故中的死亡或重伤情况要少得多。随着年龄的增长,伤害严重程度会增加。夜间和非市区发生的事故更严重。单车事故的后果似乎比多车事故更严重。然而,可能存在报告事故率的系统差异,并且可能影响了所报告的结果。与重要但未被观察到的变量(如事故中的撞击速度)的相关性可能存在,并且可以为一些结果提供替代解释。