Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1908-15. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.05.012. Epub 2010 Jun 11.
Nilsson (1981) proposed power relationships connecting changes in traffic speeds with changes in road crashes at various levels of injury severity. Increases in fatal crashes are related to the 4(th) power of the increase in mean speed, increases in serious casualty crashes (those involving death or serious injury) according to the 3(rd) power, and increases in casualty crashes (those involving death or any injury) according to the 2(nd) power. Increases in numbers of crash victims at cumulative levels of injury severity are related to the crash increases plus higher powers predicting the number of victims per crash. These relationships are frequently applied in OECD countries to estimate road trauma reductions resulting from expected speed reductions. The relationships were empirically derived based on speed changes resulting from a large number of rural speed limit changes in Sweden during 1967-1972. Nilsson (2004) noted that there had been very few urban speed limit changes studied to test his power model. This paper aims to test the assumption that the model is equally applicable in all road environments. It was found that the road environment is an important moderator of Nilsson's power model. While Nilsson's model appears satisfactory for rural highways and freeways, the model does not appear to be directly applicable to traffic speed changes on urban arterial roads. The evidence of monotonically increasing powers applicable to changes in road trauma at increasing injury severity levels with changes in mean speed is weak. The estimated power applicable to serious casualties on urban arterial roads was significantly less than that on rural highways, which was also significantly less than that on freeways. Alternative models linking the parameters of speed distributions with road trauma are reviewed and some conclusions reached for their use on urban roads instead of Nilsson's model. Further research is needed on the relationships between serious road trauma and urban speeds.
尼尔森(1981 年)提出了权力关系,将交通速度的变化与不同伤害严重程度的道路事故变化联系起来。致命事故的增加与平均速度增加的 4 次方成正比,严重伤亡事故(涉及死亡或重伤)的增加与 3 次方成正比,伤亡事故(涉及死亡或任何伤害)的增加与 2 次方成正比。在累积伤害严重程度水平上,事故受害者人数的增加与事故增加加上更高次幂预测每起事故的受害者人数有关。这些关系经常在经合组织国家中应用,以估计预期速度降低导致的道路创伤减少。这些关系是根据瑞典 1967-1972 年期间大量农村限速变化导致的速度变化经验推导得出的。尼尔森(2004 年)指出,很少有城市限速变化的研究来检验他的幂模型。本文旨在检验该模型在所有道路环境中同样适用的假设。结果发现,道路环境是尼尔森幂模型的一个重要调节因素。虽然尼尔森的模型似乎适用于农村高速公路和高速公路,但该模型似乎不适用于城市干道上的交通速度变化。在平均速度变化与伤害严重程度增加的道路创伤变化之间适用的单调递增幂的证据较弱。适用于城市干道上严重伤亡的估计幂明显小于农村高速公路上的幂,农村高速公路上的幂也明显小于高速公路上的幂。还审查了将速度分布参数与道路创伤联系起来的替代模型,并得出了一些关于在城市道路上使用这些模型而不是尼尔森模型的结论。需要进一步研究严重道路创伤与城市速度之间的关系。