Alcohol Research Group, 6475 Christie Avenue, Suite 400, Emeryville, California 94608, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Sep;71(5):674-84. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.674.
Adding a craving criterion--presently in the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, diagnosis of alcohol dependence--has been under consideration as one possible improvement to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), and was recently proposed for inclusion by the DSM Substance-Related Disorders Work Group in the Fifth Revision of diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorders. To inform cross-cultural applicability of this modification, performance of a craving criterion was examined in emergency departments in four countries manifesting distinctly different culturally based drinking patterns (Mexico, Poland, Argentina, United States).
Exploratory factor analysis and item response theory were used to examine psychometric properties and individual item characteristics of the 11 DSM-IV abuse and dependence criteria with and without craving for each country separately. Differential item functioning analysis was performed to examine differences in the difficulty of endorsement (severity) and discrimination of craving across countries.
Exploratory factor analysis found craving fit well within a one-dimensional solution, and factor loadings were high across all countries. Results from item-response theory analyses indicated that both discrimination and difficulty estimates for the craving item were located in the middle of the corresponding discrimination and difficulty ranges for the other 11 items for each country but did not substantially increase the efficiency (or information) of the overall diagnostic scheme. Across the four countries, no differential item functioning was found for difficulty, but significant differential item functioning was found for discrimination (similar to other DSM-IV criteria).
Findings suggest that, although craving performed similarly across emergency departments in the four countries, it does not add much in identification of individuals with alcohol use disorders.
目前,国际疾病分类第 10 版(ICD-10)将渴望标准纳入酒精依赖的诊断,这被认为是对精神障碍诊断与统计手册第 4 版(DSM-IV)的一项可能改进,最近也被 DSM 物质相关障碍工作组提议纳入酒精使用障碍诊断标准的第 5 次修订。为了明确该修改在跨文化中的适用性,本研究在表现出明显不同的文化饮酒模式的四个国家(墨西哥、波兰、阿根廷和美国)的急诊部门中检查了渴望标准的表现。
分别对每个国家的 DSM-IV 滥用和依赖标准的 11 个条目(含或不含渴望标准)进行探索性因子分析和项目反应理论分析,以检验其心理测量学特性和个体项目特征。对差异项目功能分析,以检验各国之间渴望标准的认同难度(严重程度)和区分度的差异。
探索性因子分析发现,渴望标准很好地符合一维解决方案,且在所有国家的因子负荷都很高。项目反应理论分析结果表明,对于每个国家的其他 11 个条目中的每一个条目,渴望条目的区分度和难度估计都位于相应的区分度和难度范围的中间,但并没有显著提高整体诊断方案的效率(或信息量)。在这四个国家中,在困难程度上没有发现差异项目功能,但在区分度上发现了显著的差异项目功能(与其他 DSM-IV 标准相似)。
这些发现表明,尽管渴望标准在四个国家的急诊部门中的表现相似,但它并不能增加对酒精使用障碍患者的识别。