• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Change plan as an active ingredient of brief motivational interventions for reducing negative consequences of drinking in hazardous drinking emergency-department patients.将计划变更作为简短动机干预的一个活性成分,以减少有危险饮酒行为的急诊患者饮酒所致不良后果。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Sep;71(5):726-33. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.726.
2
Readiness to change as a mediator of the effect of a brief motivational intervention on posttreatment alcohol-related consequences of injured emergency department hazardous drinkers.作为一种简短动机干预对受伤急诊科危险饮酒者治疗后酒精相关后果影响的调节因素的改变意愿。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Jun;23(2):185-95. doi: 10.1037/a0015648.
3
Effects of two types of brief intervention and readiness to change on alcohol use in hazardous drinkers.两种简短干预措施及改变意愿对危险饮酒者酒精使用情况的影响。
J Stud Alcohol. 2001 Sep;62(5):605-14. doi: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.605.
4
Predictors of positive drinking outcomes among youth receiving an alcohol brief intervention in the emergency department.急诊中接受简短酒精干预的青少年中阳性饮酒结果的预测因素。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Jul 1;188:102-108. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.044. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Readiness to change, drinking, and negative consequences among Polish SBIRT patients.波兰 SBIRT 患者的改变意愿、饮酒情况和不良后果。
Addict Behav. 2012 Mar;37(3):287-92. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.11.006. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
6
Recent drinking consequences, motivation to change, and changes in alcohol consumption over a three month period.近期饮酒后果、改变的动机以及三个月内饮酒量的变化。
Addict Behav. 2006 Feb;31(2):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.014. Epub 2005 Jun 24.
7
Change Talk During Brief Motivational Intervention With Young Adult Males: Strength Matters.针对年轻成年男性的简短动机性干预中的改变谈话:力量很重要。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2016 Jun;65:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
8
Readiness to change problematic drinking assessed in the emergency department as a predictor of change.在急诊科评估的改变问题饮酒行为的意愿作为改变的预测指标。
J Crit Care. 2005 Sep;20(3):251-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2005.05.009.
9
Brief alcohol intervention in the emergency department: moderators of effectiveness.急诊科简短酒精干预:有效性的调节因素
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Jul;69(4):550-60. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.550.
10
Moderators and mediators of two brief interventions for alcohol in the emergency department.急诊科两种简短干预酒精措施的调节者和调解者。
Addiction. 2010 Mar;105(3):452-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02814.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel motivational interviewing-based intervention improves engagement in physical activity and readiness to change among adolescents with chronic pain.基于新型动机性访谈的干预措施可提高青少年慢性疼痛患者的身体活动参与度和改变准备度。
Health Expect. 2024 Apr;27(2):e14031. doi: 10.1111/hex.14031.
2
Open pilot trial of an interactive digital application for campus sexual violence prevention.交互式数字应用程序预防校园性暴力的开放性试点研究。
J Community Psychol. 2023 Jul;51(5):1977-2000. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22985. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
3
Utility of Family Reports in Predicting Emergency Department Patient Alcohol Use in Tanzania.家庭报告在预测坦桑尼亚急诊科患者酒精使用中的效用。
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2022 Sep;83(5):760-767. doi: 10.15288/jsad.21-00141.
4
Preliminary study of alcohol problem severity and response to brief intervention.酒精问题严重程度及对简短干预反应的初步研究。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2021 Aug 24;16(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13722-021-00262-6.
5
Active Ingredients and Mechanisms of Change in Motivational Interviewing for Smoking Cessation in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Mixed Methods Study.冠心病患者戒烟动机性访谈的活性成分及改变机制:一项混合方法研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:599203. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.599203. eCollection 2021.
6
Examining client self-exploration in motivational interviewing: Preliminary psychometrics of an observational rating measure.检查动机性访谈中的客户自我探索:观察性评定量表的初步心理测量学。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Oct;129:108345. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108345. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
7
Developing a brief motivational intervention for young adults admitted with alcohol intoxication in the emergency department - Results from an iterative qualitative design.为因醉酒而在急诊科就诊的年轻成年人开发简短的动机性干预措施-迭代定性设计的结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 8;16(2):e0246652. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246652. eCollection 2021.
8
Active Ingredients and Mechanisms of Change in Motivational Interviewing for Medication Adherence. A Mixed Methods Study of Patient-Therapist Interaction in Patients With Schizophrenia.动机性访谈促进药物依从性的有效成分及改变机制:一项关于精神分裂症患者医患互动的混合方法研究
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Mar 24;11:78. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00078. eCollection 2020.
9
A randomized controlled trial of motivational interviewing tailored for heavy drinking latinxs.一项针对拉丁裔重度饮酒者的量身定制的动机性访谈的随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;87(9):815-830. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000428.
10
An Examination of Motivation to Change and Neural Alcohol Cue Reactivity Following a Brief Intervention.简短干预后改变动机与酒精线索神经反应性的考察
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Jun 11;10:408. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00408. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions.调节中介假设的处理:理论、方法与建议。
Multivariate Behav Res. 2007 Jan-Mar;42(1):185-227. doi: 10.1080/00273170701341316.
2
The route to change: within-session predictors of change plan completion in a motivational interview.改变的途径:动机性访谈中改变计划完成的会话内预测因素。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2010 Apr;38(3):299-305. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.12.001. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
3
Toward a theory of motivational interviewing.迈向动机性访谈理论
Am Psychol. 2009 Sep;64(6):527-37. doi: 10.1037/a0016830.
4
Readiness to change as a mediator of the effect of a brief motivational intervention on posttreatment alcohol-related consequences of injured emergency department hazardous drinkers.作为一种简短动机干预对受伤急诊科危险饮酒者治疗后酒精相关后果影响的调节因素的改变意愿。
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Jun;23(2):185-95. doi: 10.1037/a0015648.
5
Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence.动机性访谈中的改变机制:证据综述与初步评估
Addiction. 2009 May;104(5):705-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02527.x.
6
Brief alcohol intervention with college student drinkers: face-to-face versus computerized feedback.针对大学生饮酒者的简短酒精干预:面对面干预与计算机化反馈
Psychol Addict Behav. 2009 Mar;23(1):163-7. doi: 10.1037/a0014892.
7
Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial.针对大学生饮酒者拆解动机性访谈与反馈:一项随机临床试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2009 Feb;77(1):64-73. doi: 10.1037/a0014472.
8
Brief alcohol intervention in the emergency department: moderators of effectiveness.急诊科简短酒精干预:有效性的调节因素
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2008 Jul;69(4):550-60. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2008.69.550.
9
Brief alcohol interventions: do counsellors' and patients' communication characteristics predict change?简短酒精干预措施:咨询师与患者的沟通特征能否预测变化?
Alcohol Alcohol. 2008 Jan-Feb;43(1):62-9. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agm141. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
10
Client language as a mediator of motivational interviewing efficacy: where is the evidence?客户语言作为动机性访谈效果的调节因素:证据何在?
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2007 Oct;31(10 Suppl):40s-47s. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2007.00492.x.

将计划变更作为简短动机干预的一个活性成分,以减少有危险饮酒行为的急诊患者饮酒所致不良后果。

Change plan as an active ingredient of brief motivational interventions for reducing negative consequences of drinking in hazardous drinking emergency-department patients.

机构信息

Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, 121 South Main Street, Room 530, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Sep;71(5):726-33. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.726.

DOI:10.15288/jsad.2010.71.726
PMID:20731978
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2930503/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Few studies have examined the effects of brief motivational intervention components, such as change-plan completion, on treatment outcomes. This secondary analysis of an opportunistically recruited emergency-department sample of hazardous injured drinkers examines the potential predictive role of an alcohol-related change plan on treatment outcomes after accounting for pretreatment readiness. Written change plans were independently rated.

METHOD

A mediational analysis framework tested directional hypotheses between pretreatment readiness, change plan, and treatment outcomes using linear regressions. The baseline total Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC) score was covaried on 12-month DrInC total score, in all analyses. Participants who completed a brief motivational intervention and a change plan were included (N = 333).

RESULTS

Pretreatment readiness was negatively associated with alcohol consequences at 12 months, (beta = -.09, t(254) = -2.07, p < .05, and good-quality change plans, (beta = .18, t(320) = 4.37, p < .001. With change plan and readiness in the same model, the relationship between readiness and treatment outcomes became nonsignificant, but change plan remained a significant predictor of treatment outcomes in the expected direction, beta = -.17, t(254) = -2.89, p < .01. Follow-up generalized linear modeling including an interaction term (change plan and pretreatment readiness) revealed that those with high readiness and a good-quality change plan versus those with low readiness and a poor-quality change plan had better-than-predicted outcomes for either readiness or change plan alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings suggest that the change plan in brief motivational intervention may be an active ingredient of treatment associated with better outcomes over and above the influence of pretreatment readiness.

摘要

目的

鲜有研究探讨简短动机干预成分(如制定改变计划)对治疗效果的影响。本研究对机会招募的急诊危险饮酒者样本进行二次分析,旨在考察制定与酒精相关的改变计划对治疗效果的潜在预测作用,同时考虑治疗前准备情况。独立评估酒精相关改变计划。

方法

使用线性回归检验中介分析框架中治疗前准备情况、改变计划和治疗效果之间的方向性假设。所有分析均以基线总 DrInC 分数为协变量,对 12 个月的 DrInC 总分进行协方差分析。仅纳入完成简短动机干预和制定改变计划的参与者(N = 333)。

结果

治疗前准备情况与 12 个月时的酒精后果呈负相关(β=-.09,t(254)=-2.07,p<0.05),高质量的改变计划(β=1.8,t(320)=4.37,p<0.001)也是如此。在包含改变计划和准备情况的同一模型中,准备情况与治疗效果之间的关系变得不显著,但改变计划仍按预期方向成为治疗效果的显著预测因素,β=-.17,t(254)=-2.89,p<0.01。包括交互项(改变计划和治疗前准备情况)的后续广义线性模型显示,与准备情况低且改变计划质量差的患者相比,准备情况高且改变计划质量好的患者在单独考虑准备情况或改变计划时,治疗效果都更好。

结论

研究结果表明,简短动机干预中的改变计划可能是一种治疗效果的积极成分,其对治疗效果的影响超出了治疗前准备情况的影响。