Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, 121 South Main Street, Room 530, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Sep;71(5):726-33. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.726.
Few studies have examined the effects of brief motivational intervention components, such as change-plan completion, on treatment outcomes. This secondary analysis of an opportunistically recruited emergency-department sample of hazardous injured drinkers examines the potential predictive role of an alcohol-related change plan on treatment outcomes after accounting for pretreatment readiness. Written change plans were independently rated.
A mediational analysis framework tested directional hypotheses between pretreatment readiness, change plan, and treatment outcomes using linear regressions. The baseline total Drinker Inventory of Consequences (DrInC) score was covaried on 12-month DrInC total score, in all analyses. Participants who completed a brief motivational intervention and a change plan were included (N = 333).
Pretreatment readiness was negatively associated with alcohol consequences at 12 months, (beta = -.09, t(254) = -2.07, p < .05, and good-quality change plans, (beta = .18, t(320) = 4.37, p < .001. With change plan and readiness in the same model, the relationship between readiness and treatment outcomes became nonsignificant, but change plan remained a significant predictor of treatment outcomes in the expected direction, beta = -.17, t(254) = -2.89, p < .01. Follow-up generalized linear modeling including an interaction term (change plan and pretreatment readiness) revealed that those with high readiness and a good-quality change plan versus those with low readiness and a poor-quality change plan had better-than-predicted outcomes for either readiness or change plan alone.
Study findings suggest that the change plan in brief motivational intervention may be an active ingredient of treatment associated with better outcomes over and above the influence of pretreatment readiness.
鲜有研究探讨简短动机干预成分(如制定改变计划)对治疗效果的影响。本研究对机会招募的急诊危险饮酒者样本进行二次分析,旨在考察制定与酒精相关的改变计划对治疗效果的潜在预测作用,同时考虑治疗前准备情况。独立评估酒精相关改变计划。
使用线性回归检验中介分析框架中治疗前准备情况、改变计划和治疗效果之间的方向性假设。所有分析均以基线总 DrInC 分数为协变量,对 12 个月的 DrInC 总分进行协方差分析。仅纳入完成简短动机干预和制定改变计划的参与者(N = 333)。
治疗前准备情况与 12 个月时的酒精后果呈负相关(β=-.09,t(254)=-2.07,p<0.05),高质量的改变计划(β=1.8,t(320)=4.37,p<0.001)也是如此。在包含改变计划和准备情况的同一模型中,准备情况与治疗效果之间的关系变得不显著,但改变计划仍按预期方向成为治疗效果的显著预测因素,β=-.17,t(254)=-2.89,p<0.01。包括交互项(改变计划和治疗前准备情况)的后续广义线性模型显示,与准备情况低且改变计划质量差的患者相比,准备情况高且改变计划质量好的患者在单独考虑准备情况或改变计划时,治疗效果都更好。
研究结果表明,简短动机干预中的改变计划可能是一种治疗效果的积极成分,其对治疗效果的影响超出了治疗前准备情况的影响。