Suppr超能文献

质子放疗与立体定向体部放疗治疗非小细胞肺癌的剂量学比较。

Dose-volume comparison of proton radiotherapy and stereotactic body radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.

机构信息

Department of Medical Physics, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Southern Tohoku Institute of Neuroscience, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Mar 15;79(4):1225-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.05.016. Epub 2010 Aug 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study designed photon and proton treatment plans for patients treated with hypofractionated proton radiotherapy (PT) at the Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center (STPTC). We then calculated dosimetric parameters and compared results with simulated treatment plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), using dose--volume histograms to clearly explain differences in dose distributions between PT and SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-one patients with stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (stage IA, n = 15 patients; stage IB, n = 6 patients) were studied. All tumors were located in the peripheral lung, and total dose was 66 Gray equivalents (GyE) (6.6 GyE/fraction). For treatment planning, beam incidence for proton beam technique was restricted to two to three directions for PT, and seven or eight noncoplanar beams were manually selected for SBRT to achieve optimal planning target volume (PTV) coverage and minimal dose to organs at risk.

RESULTS

Regarding lung tissues, mean dose, V5, V10, V13, V15, and V20 values were 4.6 Gy, 13.2%, 11.4%, 10.6%, 10.1%, and 9.1%, respectively, for PT, whereas those values were 7.8 Gy, 32.0%, 21.8%, 17.4%, 15.3%, and 11.4%, respectively, for SBRT with a prescribed dose of 66 Gy. Pearson product moment correlation coefficients between PTV and dose--volume parameters of V5, V10, V15, and V20 were 0.45, 0.52, 0.58, and 0.63, respectively, for PT, compared to 0.52, 0.45, 0.71, and 0.74, respectively, for SBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Correlations between dose--volume parameters of the lung and PTV were observed and may indicate that PT is more advantageous than SBRT when treating a tumor with a relatively large PTV or several tumors.

摘要

目的

本研究为在日本东北南部质子治疗中心(STPTC)接受低分割质子放射治疗(PT)的患者设计了光子和质子治疗计划。然后,我们计算了剂量学参数,并使用剂量-体积直方图来清楚地解释 PT 和 SBRT 之间的剂量分布差异,将其与立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)的模拟治疗计划进行了比较。

方法和材料

研究了 21 例 I 期非小细胞肺癌(IA 期,n=15 例;IB 期,n=6 例)患者。所有肿瘤均位于肺部周围,总剂量为 66 格雷等效(GyE)(6.6 GyE/分次)。对于治疗计划,质子束技术的束入射角度限制为 PT 的两个到三个方向,对于 SBRT 手动选择七个或八个非共面射束,以实现最佳计划靶区(PTV)覆盖和最小的危及器官剂量。

结果

对于肺组织,PT 的平均剂量、V5、V10、V13、V15 和 V20 值分别为 4.6 Gy、13.2%、11.4%、10.6%、10.1%和 9.1%,而 SBRT 的相应值分别为 7.8 Gy、32.0%、21.8%、17.4%、15.3%和 11.4%,PTV 接受 66 Gy 的处方剂量。PT 的 PTV 与 V5、V10、V15 和 V20 的剂量-体积参数之间的 Pearson 积矩相关系数分别为 0.45、0.52、0.58 和 0.63,而 SBRT 的相应系数分别为 0.52、0.45、0.71 和 0.74。

结论

观察到肺的剂量-体积参数与 PTV 之间存在相关性,这可能表明当治疗具有相对较大的 PTV 或多个肿瘤的肿瘤时,PT 比 SBRT 更有利。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验