Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, NJ 07065, USA.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Jun;67(6):1313-21. doi: 10.1007/s00280-010-1421-y. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
Because glucocorticoids and the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant influence CYP3A4 activity, this study assessed whether aprepitant added to a 5-HT(3) antagonist and glucocorticoid would affect CYP3A4 induction.
In this double-blind, 2-period crossover study, 12 subjects were randomized to receive a triple regimen (oral aprepitant [A] 125 mg, intravenous ondansetron [O] 32 mg, and oral dexamethasone [D] 12 mg day 1; A 80 mg and D 8 mg days 2-3; D 8 mg day 4) in 1 of 2 periods, and a dual regimen (O 32 mg and D 20 mg day 1; D 8 mg bid days 2-4); the D dose was adjusted to account for known dexamethasone/aprepitant interaction. Oral (2 mg) and intravenous (1 mg) stable isotope ((13)C(5) (15)N(1))-labeled midazolam were simultaneously given as probes on days -1, 6, 8, 15, and 22 of each period. If the a priori 90% confidence interval for the day 6 geometric mean oral midazolam AUC(0-∞) ratio (triple/dual regimen) of fold-change from baseline was above 0.5, it would be concluded that there was no clinically meaningful between-regimen difference in CYP3A4 activity.
Day 6 oral midazolam AUC(0-∞) geometric mean fold-change from baseline was 0.84 (0.30-1.58 with A, 0.46-1.69 without A). The ratio of geometric mean oral midazolam AUC(0-∞) fold-changes was 1.00 (90% confidence interval 0.80, 1.25).
Aprepitant plus a 5-HT(3) antagonist and dexamethasone is unlikely to have a significant additional inductive effect on CYP3A4 activity beyond that of the dual regimen.
由于糖皮质激素和神经激肽-1 受体拮抗剂阿瑞匹坦会影响 CYP3A4 活性,因此本研究评估了阿瑞匹坦联合 5-HT3 拮抗剂和糖皮质激素是否会影响 CYP3A4 的诱导作用。
在这项双盲、2 期交叉研究中,12 名受试者被随机分为两组,分别接受三联方案(第 1 天口服阿瑞匹坦[A]125mg、静脉注射昂丹司琼[O]32mg 和口服地塞米松[D]12mg;第 2-3 天 A 80mg 和 D 8mg;第 4 天 D 8mg)或二联方案(第 1 天 O 32mg 和 D 20mg;第 2-4 天 D 8mg bid),其中 D 剂量根据已知的地塞米松/阿瑞匹坦相互作用进行调整。在每个周期的第-1、6、8、15 和 22 天,同时给予口服(2mg)和静脉注射(1mg)稳定同位素标记的(13C5(15)N1)-咪达唑仑作为探针。如果第 6 天的几何平均口服咪达唑仑 AUC(0-∞)比值(三联/二联方案)的 90%置信区间上限超过 0.5,则可得出结论,两种方案之间 CYP3A4 活性无临床意义的差异。
第 6 天口服咪达唑仑 AUC(0-∞)几何平均基线时的变化倍数为 0.84(A 时为 0.30-1.58,无 A 时为 0.46-1.69)。口服咪达唑仑 AUC(0-∞)比值的几何平均变化倍数为 1.00(90%置信区间为 0.80,1.25)。
阿瑞匹坦联合 5-HT3 拮抗剂和地塞米松对 CYP3A4 活性的诱导作用可能不会超过二联方案。