Suppr超能文献

机器人辅助腹腔镜手术在上尿路结石治疗中的经验

Experience with robotic assisted laparoscopic surgery in upper tract urolithiasis.

作者信息

Hemal Ashok K, Nayyar Rishi, Gupta Narmada P, Dorairajan Lalgudi N

机构信息

Department of Urology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157-1094, USA.

出版信息

Can J Urol. 2010 Aug;17(4):5299-305.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Early results indicate that robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) may be useful in managing upper tract (UT) urolithiasis. We reviewed our experience of managing 50 cases of UT urolithiasis with or without reconstruction using RALS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a record review of 50 cases of RALS for UT urolithiasis performed in two institutions from July 2006 to June 2009. The RALS procedures included pyeloplasty with pyelolithotomy (29 cases), ureterolithotomy, tailoring and reimplantation for megaureters (5 cases), ureterolithotomy with ureteral stricture reconstruction (1 case), primary UT stone surgeries (8 cases), partial nephrectomy (1 case) and ablative surgeries (6 cases). Data pertaining to indications, operative details, and complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average operating time was 105 min (86 min-135 min) for pyeloplasty with pyelolithotomy, 140 min (115 min-195 min) for ureterolithotomy, tailoring and ureteroneocystostomy and 106 min (88 min-174 min) for extended pyelolithotomy (5 cases). Mean blood loss was 77 mL (50 mL-250 mL). Stone clearance rate was 93.2%. One case of extended pyelolithotomy had hematuria requiring selective angioembolization. There was one conversion and no other major complication.

CONCLUSIONS

RALS for UT urolithiasis is safe and efficacious. It is particularly useful when stone removal is combined with reconstruction. It is a reasonable alternative for treating a solitary partial staghorn or a large pelvic stone including those in pelvic/anomalous kidneys. RALS did not seem substantially better than pure laparoscopy for isolated ureterolithotomy and for nephrectomy for a nonfunctioning kidney. Its role in the treatment of large, multiple or complete staghorn calculi needs further investigation.

摘要

目的

早期结果表明,机器人辅助腹腔镜手术(RALS)可能有助于处理上尿路(UT)尿石症。我们回顾了我们使用RALS治疗50例UT尿石症(伴或不伴重建)的经验。

材料与方法

我们对2006年7月至2009年6月在两个机构进行的50例UT尿石症RALS病例进行了记录回顾。RALS手术包括肾盂成形术加肾盂切开取石术(29例)、输尿管切开取石术、巨输尿管裁剪及再植术(5例)、输尿管切开取石术加输尿管狭窄重建术(1例)、原发性UT结石手术(8例)、部分肾切除术(1例)和消融手术(6例)。分析了有关适应证、手术细节和并发症的数据。

结果

肾盂成形术加肾盂切开取石术的平均手术时间为105分钟(86分钟 - 135分钟),输尿管切开取石术、裁剪及输尿管膀胱再植术的平均手术时间为140分钟(115分钟 - 195分钟),扩大肾盂切开取石术(5例)的平均手术时间为106分钟(88分钟 - 174分钟)。平均失血量为77毫升(50毫升 - 250毫升)。结石清除率为93.2%。1例扩大肾盂切开取石术患者出现血尿,需要进行选择性血管栓塞。有1例中转手术,无其他重大并发症。

结论

RALS治疗UT尿石症安全有效。当结石清除与重建相结合时,它特别有用。它是治疗孤立性部分鹿角形结石或大的盆腔结石(包括盆腔/异位肾中的结石)的合理选择。对于孤立性输尿管结石和无功能肾的肾切除术,RALS似乎并不比单纯腹腔镜手术有显著优势。其在治疗大的、多发的或完全鹿角形结石中的作用需要进一步研究。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验