• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选拔中心测试非技术技能以招聘到麻醉培训中的预测效度。

Predictive validity of a selection centre testing non-technical skills for recruitment to training in anaesthesia.

机构信息

Anaesthesia Recruitment Validation Group, Department of Anaesthesia, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Plymouth PL6 8DH, UK.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):603-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq228. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aeq228
PMID:20736232
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessment centres are an accepted method of recruitment in industry and are gaining popularity within medicine. We describe the development and validation of a selection centre for recruitment to speciality training in anaesthesia based on an assessment centre model incorporating the rating of candidate's non-technical skills.

METHODS

Expert consensus identified non-technical skills suitable for assessment at the point of selection. Four stations-structured interview, portfolio review, presentation, and simulation-were developed, the latter two being realistic scenarios of work-related tasks. Evaluation of the selection centre focused on applicant and assessor feedback ratings, inter-rater agreement, and internal consistency reliability coefficients. Predictive validity was sought via correlations of selection centre scores with subsequent workplace-based ratings of appointed trainees.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-four candidates were assessed over two consecutive annual recruitment rounds; 68 were appointed and followed up during training. Candidates and assessors demonstrated strong approval of the selection centre with more than 70% of ratings 'good' or 'excellent'. Mean inter-rater agreement coefficients ranged from 0.62 to 0.77 and internal consistency reliability of the selection centre score was high (Cronbach's α=0.88-0.91). The overall selection centre score was a good predictor of workplace performance during the first year of appointment.

CONCLUSIONS

An assessment centre model based on the rating of non-technical skills can produce a reliable and valid selection tool for recruitment to speciality training in anaesthesia. Early results on predictive validity are encouraging and justify further development and evaluation.

摘要

背景

评估中心是工业界招聘的一种公认方法,在医学领域也越来越受欢迎。我们描述了一种基于评估中心模型的选拔中心的开发和验证,该模型纳入了对候选人非技术技能的评分,用于招聘麻醉专业培训。

方法

专家共识确定了适合在选拔点评估的非技术技能。开发了四个站点——结构化面试、档案袋审查、演示和模拟,后两个是与工作相关任务的真实场景。选拔中心的评估侧重于申请人和评估者的反馈评分、评分者间的一致性和内部一致性可靠性系数。通过与随后任命的受训者的基于工作场所的评分相关联,寻求预测有效性。

结果

在连续两年的招聘中,有 224 名候选人接受了评估;68 名候选人被录取并在培训期间进行了随访。候选人及评估者对选拔中心给予了高度认可,超过 70%的评分是“好”或“优秀”。平均评分者间一致性系数范围为 0.62 至 0.77,选拔中心评分的内部一致性可靠性较高(Cronbach's α=0.88-0.91)。总体选拔中心得分是第一年工作表现的良好预测指标。

结论

基于非技术技能评分的评估中心模型可以为麻醉专业培训的招聘提供可靠和有效的选拔工具。预测有效性的早期结果令人鼓舞,证明了进一步的开发和评估是合理的。

相似文献

1
Predictive validity of a selection centre testing non-technical skills for recruitment to training in anaesthesia.选拔中心测试非技术技能以招聘到麻醉培训中的预测效度。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Nov;105(5):603-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq228. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
2
Development of workplace-based assessments of non-technical skills in anaesthesia.麻醉中非技术技能的基于工作场所评估的发展。
Anaesthesia. 2012 Feb;67(2):158-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06977.x.
3
The relative reliability of actively participating and passively observing raters in a simulation-based assessment for selection to specialty training in anaesthesia.主动参与和被动观察的评估者在基于模拟的麻醉专科培训选拔评估中的相对可靠性。
Anaesthesia. 2013 Jun;68(6):591-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.12255. Epub 2013 Apr 17.
4
Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.评估手术室受训者的手术技能:一种前瞻性观察研究方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta15010.
5
Non-technical skills and recruitment of anaesthesia trainees.非技术技能与麻醉住院医师的招募
Br J Anaesth. 2011 Feb;106(2):277; author reply 277-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq389.
6
Validity evidence of non-technical skills assessment instruments in simulated anaesthesia crisis management.模拟麻醉危机管理中非技术技能评估工具的效度证据
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2017 Jul;45(4):469-475. doi: 10.1177/0310057X1704500410.
7
Reliability of results produced through objectively structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS) for endotracheal intubation (ETI).通过客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)进行气管插管(ETI)所产生结果的可靠性。
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2013 Jan;23(1):51-5.
8
Anaesthetists' non-technical skills.麻醉师的非技术技能。
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Jul;105(1):38-44. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq134. Epub 2010 Jun 3.
9
The Imperial Paediatric Emergency Training Toolkit (IPETT) for use in paediatric emergency training: development and evaluation of feasibility and validity.《儿科急诊培训工具包(IPETT)在儿科急诊培训中的应用:可行性和有效性的开发和评估》。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):831-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
10
Anaesthesia non-technical skills: Can anaesthetists be trained to reliably use this behavioural marker system in 1 day?麻醉非技术技能:麻醉师能否在 1 天内可靠地使用这种行为标记系统?
Br J Anaesth. 2010 Apr;104(4):440-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq032. Epub 2010 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Objective Structured Clinical Examination to Assess Patient Safety Competencies of Japanese Medical Students: Development and Validation Argument.评估日本医学生患者安全能力的客观结构化临床考试:开发与效度论证
Cureus. 2024 Nov 19;16(11):e73969. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73969. eCollection 2024 Nov.
2
Incorporating a situational judgement test in residency selections: clinical, educational and organizational outcomes.将情景判断测试纳入住院医师选拔:临床、教育和组织结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Mar 26;24(1):339. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05310-8.
3
Simulation-based summative assessment in healthcare: an overview of key principles for practice.
医疗保健领域基于模拟的终结性评估:实践关键原则概述
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Dec 28;7(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00238-9.
4
Recruitment to anaesthesia training posts during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间及之后麻醉培训岗位的招聘情况。
Anaesthesia. 2022 May;77(5):514-518. doi: 10.1111/anae.15710. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
5
Assessing professional competence: a critical review of the Annual Review of Competence Progression.评估专业能力:《年度能力进展审查》的批判性回顾。
J R Soc Med. 2019 Jun;112(6):236-244. doi: 10.1177/0141076819848113. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
A systematic review of stakeholder views of selection methods for medical schools admission.系统评价利益相关者对医学院入学选择方法的看法。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Jun 15;18(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1235-x.
7
Lessons from surgery and anaesthesia: evaluation of non-technical skills in interventional radiology.外科手术与麻醉的经验教训:介入放射学非技术技能评估
JRSM Open. 2015 Nov 3;6(12):2054270415611834. doi: 10.1177/2054270415611834. eCollection 2015 Dec.
8
The temporal rating of emergency non-technical skills (TRENT) index for self and others: psychometric properties and emotional responses.自我与他人的应急非技术技能(TRENT)指数的时间评级:心理测量特性与情绪反应
BMC Med Educ. 2014 Nov 28;14:240. doi: 10.1186/s12909-014-0240-y.
9
Perceptions of internal medicine residency program candidates on the use of simulation in the selection process.内科住院医师培训项目申请者对在选拔过程中使用模拟的看法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):338-40. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00276.1.
10
Assessment methods in surgical training in the United Kingdom.英国外科培训中的评估方法。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2013;10:2. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2013.10.2. Epub 2013 Feb 5.