• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《儿科急诊培训工具包(IPETT)在儿科急诊培训中的应用:可行性和有效性的开发和评估》。

The Imperial Paediatric Emergency Training Toolkit (IPETT) for use in paediatric emergency training: development and evaluation of feasibility and validity.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.

出版信息

Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):831-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Dec 7.

DOI:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.013
PMID:23228558
Abstract

AIM

To develop and test the feasibility, reliability, and validity of a practical toolkit for the assessment and feedback of skills required to manage paediatric emergencies in critical care settings.

METHODS

The Imperial Paediatric Emergency Training Toolkit (IPETT) was developed based on current evidence-base and expert input. IPETT assesses both technical and non-technical skills. The technical component covers skills in the areas of clinical assessment, airway and breathing, cardiovascular, and drugs. The non-technical component is based on the validated NOTECHS tool and covers communication and interaction, cooperation and team skills, leadership and managerial skills, and decision-making. The reliability (internal consistency), content validity (inter-correlations between different skills) and concurrent validity (correlations between global technical and non-technical scores) of IPETT were prospectively evaluated in 45 simulated paediatric crises carried out in a PICU with anaesthetic and paediatric trainees (N=52). Non-parametric analyses were carried out. Significance was set at P<0.05.

RESULTS

Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients were overall acceptable for the technical (alpha range=0.638-0.810) and good for the non-technical (alpha range=0.701-0.899) component of IPETT. The median inter-skill correlation was rho=0.564 and rho=0.549 for the technical and non-technical components, respectively. These indicate good content validity, as the skills were inter-related but not redundant. We also demonstrate a correlation between the global technical and non-technical scores (rho=0.471) - all Ps<0.05 during the assessments.

CONCLUSION

IPETT offers a psychometrically viable and feasible to use tool in the context of paediatric emergencies training. This study shows that assessment of technical and non-technical skills in combination may offer a more clinically relevant model for training in paediatric emergencies. Further validation should aim to demonstrate skill retention over time and skill transfer from simulation-based training to real emergencies.

摘要

目的

开发和测试一种实用工具包,用于评估和反馈在重症监护环境中处理儿科急症所需的技能,以评估其可行性、可靠性和有效性。

方法

根据现有循证医学证据和专家意见,开发了 Imperial Paediatric Emergency Training Toolkit(IPETT)。IPETT 评估技术和非技术技能。技术部分涵盖临床评估、气道和呼吸、心血管和药物等领域的技能。非技术部分基于经过验证的 NOTECHS 工具,涵盖沟通和互动、合作和团队技能、领导力和管理技能以及决策制定。在重症监护病房(PICU)进行的 45 例模拟儿科危象中,前瞻性评估了麻醉和儿科学员(N=52)的 IPETT 的可靠性(内部一致性)、内容有效性(不同技能之间的相关性)和同时有效性(全球技术和非技术评分之间的相关性)。进行了非参数分析。P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

IPETT 技术部分的 Cronbach α 可靠性系数总体上可接受(范围=0.638-0.810),非技术部分良好(范围=0.701-0.899)。技术和非技术部分的中位数技能相关性分别为 rho=0.564 和 rho=0.549,表明内容有效性良好,因为这些技能是相互关联但不重复的。我们还在评估过程中证明了全球技术和非技术评分之间的相关性(rho=0.471),所有 P<0.05。

结论

IPETT 在儿科急症培训背景下提供了一种具有心理测量学可行性和实用性的工具。本研究表明,综合评估技术和非技术技能可能为儿科急症培训提供更具临床相关性的模型。进一步的验证应旨在证明随着时间的推移保留技能和从模拟训练到真实紧急情况的技能转移。

相似文献

1
The Imperial Paediatric Emergency Training Toolkit (IPETT) for use in paediatric emergency training: development and evaluation of feasibility and validity.《儿科急诊培训工具包(IPETT)在儿科急诊培训中的应用:可行性和有效性的开发和评估》。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jun;84(6):831-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.11.013. Epub 2012 Dec 7.
2
Tactical and operational response to major incidents: feasibility and reliability of skills assessment using novel virtual environments.重大事件的战术和操作响应:使用新型虚拟环境进行技能评估的可行性和可靠性。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):992-8. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
3
A multicentre observational study to evaluate a new tool to assess emergency physicians' non-technical skills.一项评估新工具评估急诊医师非技术技能的多中心观察研究。
Emerg Med J. 2013 Jun;30(6):437-43. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2012-201237. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
4
Assessing the surgical skills of trainees in the operating theatre: a prospective observational study of the methodology.评估手术室受训者的手术技能:一种前瞻性观察研究方法。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Jan;15(1):i-xxi, 1-162. doi: 10.3310/hta15010.
5
Development, initial reliability and validity testing of an observational tool for assessing technical skills of operating room nurses.一种用于评估手术室护士技术技能的观察工具的开发、初始信效度测试
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Sep;46(9):1187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.002. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
6
Improving surgical ward care: development and psychometric properties of a global assessment toolkit.提高外科病房护理质量:全球评估工具包的制定及心理测量学特性。
Ann Surg. 2014 May;259(5):904-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000451.
7
The Simulation Team Assessment Tool (STAT): development, reliability and validation.模拟团队评估工具(STAT):开发、可靠性和验证。
Resuscitation. 2012 Jul;83(7):879-86. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.012. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
8
Boot cAMP: educational outcomes after 4 successive years of preparatory simulation-based training at onset of internship.Boot cAMP:在实习开始时进行连续 4 年基于模拟的预备培训后的教育成果。
J Surg Educ. 2012 Mar-Apr;69(2):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.08.007.
9
Simulating extracorporeal membrane oxygenation emergencies to improve human performance. Part II: assessment of technical and behavioral skills.模拟体外膜肺氧合紧急情况以提高人员表现。第二部分:技术和行为技能评估。
Simul Healthc. 2006 Winter;1(4):228-32. doi: 10.1097/01.SIH.0000243551.01521.74.
10
Reliability of a revised NOTECHS scale for use in surgical teams.用于手术团队的修订版NOTECHS量表的可靠性。
Am J Surg. 2008 Aug;196(2):184-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.08.070. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Simulation-Based Interprofessional Teamwork Assessment Tool.基于模拟的跨专业团队合作评估工具的开发。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Apr;11(2):168-176. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-18-00729.1.
2
Simulation in paediatric training.儿科培训中的模拟
Arch Dis Child Educ Pract Ed. 2016 Feb;101(1):8-14. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-309143. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
3
Five Questions Critical Care Educators Should Ask About Simulation-Based Medical Education.重症护理教育工作者应就基于模拟的医学教育提出的五个问题。
Clin Chest Med. 2015 Sep;36(3):469-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jun 26.