• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

样本量计算和功效分析:快速回顾。

Sample size calculation and power analysis: a quick review.

机构信息

The American Association of Diabetes Educators, Chicago, Illinois

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2010 Sep-Oct;36(5):701-7. doi: 10.1177/0145721710380791. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1177/0145721710380791
PMID:20736385
Abstract

Diabetes educators conducting research need a basic understanding of statistical concepts so study findings are useful and can be read with confidence. Selecting an adequate sample size is a key step that needs to be considered early in the process of designing a research study. A sample size too small will not provide reliable answers to the study questions asked or research hypotheses needing to be tested. A sample size that is too big can make the study unwieldy, wasting both time and effort. An adequate sample size uses resources and time in the most cost-effective manner and is essential to producing useful research findings. The purpose of this article is to understand the importance of selecting an adequate sample size in gaining information from a small group (sample) that can be generalized to a larger group (population) along with discussing power analyses.

摘要

糖尿病教育者在进行研究时需要基本了解统计概念,以便研究结果有用且能够被自信地解读。选择适当的样本量是研究设计过程中需要早期考虑的关键步骤。样本量太小,将无法为研究问题或需要测试的研究假设提供可靠的答案。样本量太大可能会使研究变得复杂,浪费时间和精力。适当的样本量以最具成本效益的方式利用资源和时间,对于产生有用的研究结果至关重要。本文的目的是了解从小群体(样本)中获取信息并将其推广到更大群体(总体)时选择适当样本量的重要性,并讨论功效分析。

相似文献

1
Sample size calculation and power analysis: a quick review.样本量计算和功效分析:快速回顾。
Diabetes Educ. 2010 Sep-Oct;36(5):701-7. doi: 10.1177/0145721710380791. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
2
Reliability and validity: a quick review.信度与效度:简要回顾
Diabetes Educ. 2007 Sep-Oct;33(5):775-6, 780. doi: 10.1177/0145721707308172.
3
[An investigation of the statistical power of the effect size in randomized controlled trials for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using Chinese medicine].[关于使用中药治疗2型糖尿病患者的随机对照试验中效应量统计功效的调查]
Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2012 Jan;32(1):119-23.
4
Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software.使用 G*Power 软件进行样本量确定和功效分析。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:17. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
5
Sample size calculations.样本量计算。
Nephron Clin Pract. 2011;118(4):c319-23. doi: 10.1159/000322830. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
6
Statistical power and sample size calculations: A primer for pediatric surgeons.统计功效和样本量计算:小儿外科医师入门。
J Pediatr Surg. 2020 Jul;55(7):1173-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Choosing and using theories in diabetes education research.糖尿病教育研究中理论的选择与应用。
Diabetes Educ. 2005 Jul-Aug;31(4):513, 515, 518-20. doi: 10.1177/0145721705278947.
8
Concepts in sample size determination.样本量确定的相关概念。
Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Sep-Oct;23(5):660-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.107385.
9
The challenge of conducting clinical research in diabetes care and education.
Diabetes Educ. 1996 Jan-Feb;22(1):23-7. doi: 10.1177/014572179602200103.
10
Sample size and statistical power in reproductive research.生殖研究中的样本量与统计效能
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Aug;86(2):302-5. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00104-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of cognitive stimulation for individuals with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.认知刺激对轻度认知障碍个体的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 10;15(6):e090767. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090767.
2
Seasonal variations in haematological and biochemical parameters of healthy Gambian adults: Retrospective study 2018-2022.健康冈比亚成年人血液学和生化参数的季节性变化:2018 - 2022年回顾性研究
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 Sep 17;4(9):e0003715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003715. eCollection 2024.
3
Comments on "Assessment of pain and quality of life in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a cohort study".
关于“心脏手术患者疼痛与生活质量评估:一项队列研究”的评论
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2023 Jul 17;69(7):e20230304. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.20230304. eCollection 2023.
4
Response: Commentary: Statistical Modeling for the Prediction of Infectious Disease Dissemination With Special Reference to COVID-19 Spread.回应:评论:用于预测传染病传播的统计建模,特别参考新冠病毒传播情况
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 31;9:783201. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.783201. eCollection 2021.
5
Sample Size Estimation in Veterinary Epidemiologic Research.兽医流行病学研究中的样本量估计
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Feb 17;7:539573. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.539573. eCollection 2020.
6
Power Analysis and Sample Size, When and Why?功效分析与样本量:何时以及为何进行?
Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Mar;58(1):3-4. doi: 10.5152/tao.2020.0330. Epub 2020 Mar 1.
7
Opportunities and challenges for junior investigators conducting pain clinical trials.初级研究人员开展疼痛临床试验面临的机遇与挑战。
Pain Rep. 2019 May-Jun;4(3). doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000639.
8
Minimally invasive versus conventional approaches in total knee replacement/arthroplasty: A review of the literature.全膝关节置换术/关节成形术中的微创与传统手术方法:文献综述
J Orthop. 2018 Mar 27;15(2):459-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2018.03.026. eCollection 2018 Jun.
9
How Many Subjects are Needed for a Visual Field Normative Database? A Comparison of Ground Truth and Bootstrapped Statistics.视野规范数据库需要多少受试者?地面真值与自抽样统计的比较。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2018 Mar 2;7(2):1. doi: 10.1167/tvst.7.2.1. eCollection 2018 Mar.
10
Risk factors for preeclampsia in infertile Chinese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A prospective cohort study: Methodological issues.中国多囊卵巢综合征不孕女性子痫前期的危险因素:一项前瞻性队列研究:方法学问题
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Nov;19(11):1204. doi: 10.1111/jch.13050. Epub 2017 Jul 18.