Hedner T, Thulin T, Gustafsson S, Olsson S O
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1990;39(5):427-33. doi: 10.1007/BF00280931.
A double-blind, parallel-group multicentre study has been done to compare the antihypertensive properties, effects on serum lipoproteins and adverse effect profiles of diltiazem and metoprolol given as monotherapy to primary hypertensive patients. 128 patients were included from 10 participating centers. Following a placebo wash-out period of 5 weeks, patients were randomized either to diltiazem or metoprolol treatment according to a forced titration regimen. Each dose was given for a 4-week period in a stepwise regimen. A total of 119 patients, 59 and 60 in the two groups, completed the study. Supine and standing BPs were reduced in a similar, dose-dependent fashion by diltiazem and metoprolol. In the former supine BP fell from 161/101 to 151/91 mmHg at the highest dose level. In the latter patients, supine BP at the highest dose level was reduced from 161/102 to 155/94 mmHg. Target pressures (DBP less than or equal to 90 mmHg and/or DBP reduction of greater than or equal to 10%) were reached in 63% and 48% of the patients, respectively. HDL-cholesterol was increased in diltiazem-treated patients and decreased in those on metoprolol. Otherwise, serum lipoproteins did not differ significantly between treatments. The incidence and severity of dose-dependent adverse effects did not differ significantly between treatments, although moderate to distressing side effects were reported more commonly by metoprolol-treated patients. Ankle oedema and breathlessness tended to be more common on diltiazem therapy, while tiredness, increased sweating and sleep disturbances appeared to be experienced more frequently by metoprolol-treated patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
一项双盲、平行组多中心研究比较了地尔硫䓬和美托洛尔作为单一疗法用于原发性高血压患者时的降压特性、对血清脂蛋白的影响以及不良反应情况。10个参与中心纳入了128例患者。经过5周的安慰剂洗脱期后,患者根据强制滴定方案随机分为地尔硫䓬组或美托洛尔组。每种剂量按逐步方案给药4周。共有119例患者完成了研究,两组分别为59例和60例。地尔硫䓬和美托洛尔以相似的剂量依赖性方式降低仰卧位和站立位血压。在前者中,最高剂量水平时仰卧位血压从161/101 mmHg降至151/91 mmHg。在后者中,最高剂量水平时仰卧位血压从161/102 mmHg降至155/94 mmHg。分别有63%和48%的患者达到目标血压(舒张压≤90 mmHg和/或舒张压降低≥10%)。地尔硫䓬治疗的患者高密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高,美托洛尔治疗的患者则降低。除此之外,治疗之间血清脂蛋白无显著差异。尽管美托洛尔治疗的患者更常报告中度至令人苦恼的副作用,但剂量依赖性不良反应的发生率和严重程度在治疗之间无显著差异。地尔硫䓬治疗时踝部水肿和呼吸困难往往更常见,而美托洛尔治疗的患者似乎更常出现疲劳、出汗增多和睡眠障碍。(摘要截选至250词)