Lange U
Aktuelle Gerontol. 1977 Jun;7(6):315-20.
The legitimate claim on social assistance riveted in the Federal Legislation on Social Welfare and deduced from the welfare-state-postulate of the Constitution is only partially valid (obligatory assistance only). Applying this claim substantially is legally tied to discretionary decisions of the administration. Handling such estimates in a restrictive way makes the legitimate claim invalide. Social values are significantly determined by equivalent-maxims. Claims on social assistance, however, are not being deduced from preperformances (in a judical sense in regard of pensions) but are being derived from a diffuse claim on a social state incured with the odium of statutory relief for the necessitous. It is empirically provable that the causes for need of social assistance are of a social kind. Therefore, the claim on social assistance can only be a claim to "reparation". This understanding could be seen as an adequate basis for a progressive administration of social welfare.
源自《联邦社会福利法》并从宪法的福利国家假设推导出来的对社会援助的合法主张仅部分有效(仅强制援助)。实质性地应用这一主张在法律上取决于行政部门的自由裁量决定。以限制性方式处理此类评估会使合法主张无效。社会价值在很大程度上由平等原则决定。然而,社会援助的主张并非源自预先履行(从养老金的司法意义上讲),而是源自对社会国家的一种模糊主张,这种主张伴随着对贫困者法定救济的恶名。从经验上可以证明,社会援助需求的原因具有社会性。因此,对社会援助的主张只能是一种“赔偿”主张。这种理解可被视为社会福利渐进管理的适当基础。