Suppr超能文献

222 家 ACS NSQIP 医院中腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的结局比较。

Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 ACS NSQIP hospitals.

机构信息

Division of Research and Optimal Patient Care, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

出版信息

Surgery. 2010 Oct;148(4):625-35; discussion 635-7. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.025. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The benefit of laparoscopic (LA) versus open (OA) appendectomy, particularly for complicated appendicitis, remains unclear. Our objectives were to assess 30-day outcomes after LA versus OA for acute appendicitis and complicated appendicitis, determine the incidence of specific outcomes after appendectomy, and examine factors influencing the utilization and duration of the operative approach with multi-institutional clinical data.

METHODS

Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) database (2005-2008), patients were identified who underwent emergency appendectomy for acute appendicitis at 222 participating hospitals. Regression models, which included propensity score adjustment to minimize the influence of treatment selection bias, were constructed. Models assessed the association between surgical approach (LA vs OA) and risk-adjusted overall morbidity, surgical site infection (SSI), serious morbidity, and serious morbidity/mortality, as well as individual complications in patients with acute appendicitis and complicated appendicitis. The relationships between operative approach, operative duration, and extended duration of stay with hospital academic affiliation were also examined.

RESULTS

Of 32,683 patients, 24,969 (76.4%) underwent LA and 7,714 (23.6%) underwent OA. Patients who underwent OA were significantly older with more comorbidities compared with those who underwent LA. Patients treated with LA were less likely to experience an overall morbidity (4.5% vs 8.8%; odds ratio [OR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.68) or a SSI (3.3% vs 6.7%; OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.65) but not a serious morbidity (2.6% vs 4.2%; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74-1.01) or a serious morbidity/mortality (2.6% vs 4.3%; OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.74-1.01) compared with those who underwent OA. All patients treated with LA were significantly less likely to develop individual infectious complications except for organ space SSI. Among patients with complicated appendicitis, organ space SSI was significantly more common after laparoscopic appendectomy (6.3% vs 4.8%; OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.05-1.73). For all patients with acute appendicitis, those treated at academic-affiliated versus community hospitals were equally likely to undergo LA versus OA (77.0% vs 77.3%; P = .58). Operative duration at academic centers was significantly longer for both LA and OA (LA, 47 vs 38 minutes [P < .0001]; OA, 49 vs 44 minutes [P < .0001]). Median duration of stay after LA was 1 day at both academic-affiliated and community hospitals.

CONCLUSION

Within ACS NSQIP hospitals, LA is associated with lower overall morbidity in selected patients. However, patients with complicated appendicitis may have a greater risk of organ space SSI after LA. Academic affiliation does not seem to influence the operative approach. However, LA is associated with similar durations of stay but slightly greater operative times than OA at academic versus community hospitals.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜(LA)与开腹(OA)阑尾切除术的益处,尤其是在复杂阑尾炎方面,仍不清楚。我们的目的是评估 30 天内 LA 与 OA 治疗急性阑尾炎和复杂阑尾炎的结果,确定阑尾切除术后特定结果的发生率,并使用多机构临床数据检查影响手术方法选择和手术时间的因素。

方法

使用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划(ACS NSQIP)数据库(2005-2008 年),在 222 家参与医院中确定接受紧急阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的患者。构建了回归模型,包括倾向评分调整,以尽量减少治疗选择偏倚的影响。模型评估了手术方法(LA 与 OA)与风险调整后的总体发病率、手术部位感染(SSI)、严重发病率以及严重发病率/死亡率以及急性阑尾炎和复杂阑尾炎患者的个别并发症之间的关联。还研究了手术方法、手术时间与延长住院时间与医院学术隶属关系之间的关系。

结果

在 32683 名患者中,24969 名(76.4%)接受 LA 治疗,7714 名(23.6%)接受 OA 治疗。接受 OA 治疗的患者年龄明显较大,合并症较多。与接受 OA 治疗的患者相比,接受 LA 治疗的患者总体发病率较低(4.5% vs 8.8%;比值比[OR],0.60;95%置信区间[CI],0.54-0.68)或 SSI(3.3% vs 6.7%;OR,0.57;95% CI,0.50-0.65),但严重发病率(2.6% vs 4.2%;OR,0.86;95% CI,0.74-1.01)或严重发病率/死亡率(2.6% vs 4.3%;OR,0.87;95% CI,0.74-1.01)并无差异。与接受 OA 治疗的患者相比,所有接受 LA 治疗的患者发生除器官空间 SSI 以外的所有感染性并发症的可能性均显著降低。在复杂阑尾炎患者中,腹腔镜阑尾切除术后器官空间 SSI 明显更为常见(6.3% vs 4.8%;OR,1.35;95% CI,1.05-1.73)。对于所有急性阑尾炎患者,在学术附属机构和社区医院接受治疗的患者接受 LA 与 OA 的可能性相同(77.0% vs 77.3%;P =.58)。学术中心的手术时间明显较长,LA 为 47 分钟,OA 为 44 分钟(P <.0001);LA 为 49 分钟,OA 为 44 分钟(P <.0001)。LA 在学术附属机构和社区医院的住院时间中位数均为 1 天。

结论

在 ACS NSQIP 医院中,LA 与选定患者的总体发病率降低相关。然而,复杂阑尾炎患者可能在接受 LA 后有更高的器官空间 SSI 风险。学术隶属关系似乎并不影响手术方法。然而,LA 与社区医院相比,在学术医院与社区医院的手术时间相似,但手术时间略长。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验