• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合作研究的利弊:重新审视社会隔离假说以及大学在促进社会正义中的作用。

The good, the bad, and the ugly of partnered research: revisiting the sequestration thesis and the role of universities in promoting social justice.

机构信息

College for Interdisciplinary Studies, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

出版信息

Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):485-505. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.3.f.

DOI:10.2190/HS.40.3.f
PMID:20799672
Abstract

As universities increasingly rely on external sources of research funding, researchers worldwide are realizing that if their work is financially supported by organizations with distinct political or financial interests, they risk their careers if their results deviate from the interests of their funding partners. This article presents a case that illustrates how ugly this situation can become. Reviewing the literature on the advantages and dangers of partnered research, the historical role of universities, funding trends, and university mission statements, the authors contend that universities must engage in service learning and participatory action research, but must ensure that faculty members engaging in academic activity with partners-whether industry, hospitals, governments, nongovernmental organizations, or communities-have their professional integrity protected. If doubt exists about whether the partner can or will honor these principles or the mission of universities for social good, universities should avoid granting joint or affiliate appointments or accepting funds or favors of any kind. Universities also need formal structures to ensure ethical application of innovation and principled partnership engagement. In becoming servants of government or corporatism, universities have become less vital to society and are failing in their mission to promote social justice and sustainability. Strong measures are needed to restore public trust.

摘要

随着大学越来越依赖外部的研究资金来源,世界各地的研究人员逐渐意识到,如果他们的工作是由具有明显政治或财务利益的组织资助的,那么如果他们的研究结果偏离了资助伙伴的利益,他们的职业生涯就会面临风险。本文提出了一个案例,说明了这种情况可能会变得多么糟糕。作者通过审查关于合作研究的优势和危险、大学的历史角色、资助趋势以及大学使命陈述的文献,认为大学必须从事服务学习和参与式行动研究,但必须确保从事与合作伙伴(无论是企业、医院、政府、非政府组织还是社区)进行学术活动的教职员工的专业诚信得到保护。如果对合作伙伴是否能够或愿意遵守这些原则或大学的社会公益使命存在疑问,大学应避免授予联合或附属任命,或接受任何形式的资金或好处。大学还需要正式的结构来确保创新和有原则的伙伴关系参与的道德应用。大学成为政府或社团主义的仆人,已经对社会变得不那么重要,并且未能履行促进社会正义和可持续性的使命。需要采取强有力的措施来恢复公众信任。

相似文献

1
The good, the bad, and the ugly of partnered research: revisiting the sequestration thesis and the role of universities in promoting social justice.合作研究的利弊:重新审视社会隔离假说以及大学在促进社会正义中的作用。
Int J Health Serv. 2010;40(3):485-505. doi: 10.2190/HS.40.3.f.
2
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
3
Industry and the profession of medicine: balancing appropriate relationships with the need for innovation.产业界与医学界:平衡适当关系与创新需求。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Sep;54(3 Suppl):47S-9S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.069.
4
The absent professor: why we don't teach research ethics and what to do about it.缺席的教授:为何我们不教授研究伦理以及如何应对这一问题。
Am J Bioeth. 2002 Fall;2(4):38-49. doi: 10.1162/152651602320957556.
5
Academic-industrial collaboration: the good, the bad, and the ugly.学术-产业合作:利弊与乱象
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2002;113:227-39; discussion 239-40.
6
Medical innovation and institutional interdependence: rethinking university-industry connections.医学创新与机构间的相互依存关系:重新思考大学与产业界的联系
JAMA. 2002 Jan 2;287(1):72-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.1.72.
7
Developing community health promotion interventions: selecting partners and fostering collaboration.开展社区健康促进干预措施:选择合作伙伴并促进合作。
Health Promot Pract. 2003 Jul;4(3):314-22. doi: 10.1177/1524839903004003016.
8
Ethical challenges to the integrity of physicians: financial conflicts of interest in clinical research.医生诚信面临的伦理挑战:临床研究中的经济利益冲突。
Account Res. 2004 Apr-Jun;11(2):119-39. doi: 10.1080/03050620490512313.
9
Environmental justice research and action: a case study in political economy and community-academic collaboration.环境正义研究与行动:政治经济学与社区-学术合作的案例研究
Int Q Community Health Educ. 2006;26(3):213-31. doi: 10.2190/IQ.26.3.b.
10
Developing community partner training: regulations and relationships.开展社区合作伙伴培训:法规与关系
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):23-30. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.23.