Solomon Stephanie, Piechowski Patricia J
Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO 63104-1314, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Jun;6(2):23-30. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.23.
While funders increasingly support research that partners with communities, community partners still must submit to a regulatory oversight structure that does not reflect their unique research ethics challenges and needs. In recognition of the importance of collaborative research endeavors, the authors engaged in a process of reconnaissance and negotiations with local community partners and research ethics boards (REBs) at the University of Michigan to begin to address the mismatch between regulatory demands and community-based research realities. This preliminary process yielded both changes in the REB oversight structure and training required of community partnered research. While the ultimate impact of these changes remains to be seen, the process itself yielded insights and materials of use to both our local REBs, and hopefully those at other institutions as well. This article will present those insights and provide links to those materials.
虽然资助者越来越支持与社区合作的研究,但社区合作伙伴仍必须服从一种监管监督结构,而这种结构并未反映出他们独特的研究伦理挑战和需求。认识到合作研究工作的重要性,作者们与密歇根大学的当地社区合作伙伴及研究伦理委员会(REB)进行了勘察和谈判,以开始解决监管要求与基于社区的研究现实之间的不匹配问题。这一初步过程带来了REB监督结构的变化以及社区合作研究所需的培训。虽然这些变化的最终影响还有待观察,但这个过程本身产生了对我们当地的REB以及其他机构(希望也如此)有用的见解和材料。本文将呈现这些见解并提供这些材料的链接。