Katarina Nilsson-Helander, Department of Orthopaedics, Kungsbacka Hospital, SE-434 40 Kungsbacka, Sweden.
Am J Sports Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2186-93. doi: 10.1177/0363546510376052. Epub 2010 Aug 27.
There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture. Few randomized controlled studies have compared outcomes after surgical or nonsurgical treatment with both groups receiving early mobilization.
This study was undertaken to compare outcomes of patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture treated with or without surgery using early mobilization and identical rehabilitation protocols.
Randomized, controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Ninety-seven patients (79 men, 18 women; mean age, 41 years) with acute Achilles tendon rupture were treated and followed for 1 year. The primary end point was rerupturing. Patients were evaluated using the Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS), functional tests, and clinical examination at 6 and 12 months after injury.
There were 6 (12%) reruptures in the nonsurgical group and 2 (4%) in the surgical group (P = .377). The mean 6- and 12-month ATRS were 72 and 88 points in the surgical group and 71 and 86 points in the nonsurgical group, respectively. Improvements in ATRS between 6 and 12 months were significant for both groups, with no significant between-group differences. At the 6-month evaluation, the surgical group had better results compared with the nonsurgically treated group in some of the muscle function tests; however, at the 12-month evaluation there were no differences between the 2 groups except for the heel-rise work test in favor of the surgical group. At the 12-month follow-up, the level of function of the injured leg remained significantly lower than that of the uninjured leg in both groups.
The results of this study did not demonstrate any statistically significant difference between surgical and nonsurgical treatment. Furthermore, the study suggests that early mobilization is beneficial for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture whether they are treated surgically or nonsurgically. The preferred treatment strategy for patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture remains a subject of debate. Although the study met the sample size dictated by the authors' a priori power calculation, the difference in the rerupture rate might be considered clinically important by some.
对于急性跟腱断裂患者,目前尚无关于最佳治疗方法的共识。很少有随机对照研究比较过手术和非手术治疗的结果,且两组患者都接受了早期活动。
本研究旨在比较接受或不接受手术治疗(均采用早期活动和相同的康复方案)的急性跟腱断裂患者的结局。
随机对照试验;证据等级,1 级。
97 例(79 例男性,18 例女性;平均年龄 41 岁)急性跟腱断裂患者接受治疗并随访 1 年。主要终点是再断裂。患者在受伤后 6 个月和 12 个月时采用跟腱总断裂评分(Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score,ATRS)、功能试验和临床检查进行评估。
非手术组发生 6 例(12%)再断裂,手术组发生 2 例(4%)(P =.377)。手术组的 6 个月和 12 个月 ATRS 平均值分别为 72 分和 88 分,非手术组分别为 71 分和 86 分。两组患者在 6 个月至 12 个月期间的 ATRS 均显著改善,但组间差异无统计学意义。在 6 个月评估时,手术组在一些肌肉功能测试中优于非手术治疗组;然而,在 12 个月评估时,两组除了手术组更有利于跟腱提踵工作测试外,其余无差异。在 12 个月随访时,两组患者患侧下肢的功能水平仍明显低于健侧。
本研究结果未显示手术和非手术治疗之间存在任何统计学差异。此外,本研究表明,对于急性跟腱断裂患者,早期活动是有益的,无论他们接受手术治疗还是非手术治疗。对于急性跟腱断裂患者,首选治疗策略仍然存在争议。尽管本研究符合作者事先计算的样本量,但一些人可能认为再断裂率的差异具有临床意义。