Rana Balvinder, Pillai Anand, Grime Ben, Grime Ian, Abdulijawad Salim
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Road, M23 9LT, United Kingdom.
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom.
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025 Jan 21;63:102902. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102902. eCollection 2025 Apr.
There has been a major shift towards nonoperative treatment of Achilles rupture in the past decade even though there are few studies analysing factors which could affect outcomes of this treatment. This retrospective observational study was undertaken to investigate if patient related factors of age and gender or injury related factors of tendon gap, location of the tendon rupture and laterality of rupture affected the long-term functional outcomes of nonoperatively treated Achilles Tendon rupture patients.
Achilles Tendon Rupture Scores (ATRS) at a minimum follow up of one year for 22 patients treated by the functional treatment regime were analysed statistically using Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test and Welch -test to document if there were any significant differences in the scores for five factors: patients' age, gender, the size of tendon gap, location of the ruptures from tendon insertion and laterality of the rupture. Reruptures and failure to heal cases were also documented.
The overall ATRS of the group was 85.8 (range 65-100). Age of the patients was the only factor affecting ATRS, patients less than 50 years had a better outcome (mean ATRS 92.6, range 65-100) than patients aged more than 50 years (mean ATRS 81.1, range 70-94, . None of the other factors analysed had any significant impact on the functional outcomes. Tendon Gap <20 mm (mean ATRS 81.1, range 65-100) or > 20 mm (mean ATRS 88.4, range 70-100) did not have a significant impact on outcomes . There were no reruptures or failure to heal cases. Results indicated that a relatively large tendon gap is not a contraindication for non-operative functional management especially in patients less than 50 years of age.
在过去十年中,跟腱断裂的治疗方式已发生了重大转变,转向非手术治疗,尽管很少有研究分析可能影响这种治疗效果的因素。本回顾性观察研究旨在调查患者的年龄和性别等相关因素,或肌腱间隙、肌腱断裂位置及断裂侧别等损伤相关因素是否会影响非手术治疗的跟腱断裂患者的长期功能结局。
对采用功能治疗方案治疗的22例患者进行至少一年的随访,使用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Welch检验对跟腱断裂评分(ATRS)进行统计学分析,以记录患者年龄、性别、肌腱间隙大小、距肌腱附着点的断裂位置以及断裂侧别这五个因素的评分是否存在显著差异。还记录了再断裂和未愈合病例。
该组患者的总体ATRS为85.8(范围65 - 100)。患者年龄是影响ATRS的唯一因素,50岁以下患者的结局更好(平均ATRS 92.6,范围65 - 100),优于50岁以上患者(平均ATRS 81.1,范围70 - 94)。分析的其他因素均未对功能结局产生任何显著影响。肌腱间隙<20mm(平均ATRS 81.1,范围65 - 100)或>20mm(平均ATRS 88.4,范围70 - 100)对结局均无显著影响。未出现再断裂或未愈合病例。结果表明,相对较大的肌腱间隙并非非手术功能治疗的禁忌证,尤其是对于50岁以下的患者。