Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Stony Brook University, Putnam Hall, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Psychol Bull. 2010 Sep;136(5):768-821. doi: 10.1037/a0020327.
We performed a quantitative review of associations between the higher order personality traits in the Big Three and Big Five models (i.e., neuroticism, extraversion, disinhibition, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness) and specific depressive, anxiety, and substance use disorders (SUD) in adults. This approach resulted in 66 meta-analyses. The review included 175 studies published from 1980 to 2007, which yielded 851 effect sizes. For a given analysis, the number of studies ranged from three to 63 (total sample size ranged from 1,076 to 75,229). All diagnostic groups were high on neuroticism (mean Cohen's d = 1.65) and low on conscientiousness (mean d = -1.01). Many disorders also showed low extraversion, with the largest effect sizes for dysthymic disorder (d = -1.47) and social phobia (d = -1.31). Disinhibition was linked to only a few conditions, including SUD (d = 0.72). Finally, agreeableness and openness were largely unrelated to the analyzed diagnoses. Two conditions showed particularly distinct profiles: SUD, which was less related to neuroticism but more elevated on disinhibition and disagreeableness, and specific phobia, which displayed weaker links to all traits. Moderator analyses indicated that epidemiologic samples produced smaller effects than patient samples and that Eysenck's inventories showed weaker associations than NEO scales. In sum, we found that common mental disorders are strongly linked to personality and have similar trait profiles. Neuroticism was the strongest correlate across the board, but several other traits showed substantial effects independent of neuroticism. Greater attention to these constructs can significantly benefit psychopathology research and clinical practice.
我们对大五类和大三元模型中的高阶人格特质(即神经质、外向性、冲动性、尽责性、宜人性和开放性)与成人特定的抑郁、焦虑和物质使用障碍(SUD)之间的关联进行了定量综述。这种方法产生了 66 项荟萃分析。综述包括 1980 年至 2007 年发表的 175 项研究,产生了 851 个效应量。对于给定的分析,研究数量从 3 到 63 不等(总样本量从 1076 到 75229 不等)。所有诊断组在神经质方面得分较高(平均 Cohen's d = 1.65),尽责性得分较低(平均 d = -1.01)。许多障碍也表现出较低的外向性,其中心境恶劣障碍(d = -1.47)和社交恐惧症(d = -1.31)的效应量最大。冲动性仅与少数疾病有关,包括 SUD(d = 0.72)。最后,宜人性和开放性与分析诊断基本无关。有两种情况表现出特别明显的特征:SUD 与神经质的相关性较低,但与冲动性和不合意性的相关性较高,而特定恐惧症则与所有特质的相关性较弱。调节分析表明,流行病学样本产生的效应小于患者样本,而 Eysenck 量表的相关性弱于 NEO 量表。总之,我们发现常见的精神障碍与人格密切相关,具有相似的特质特征。神经质是所有障碍中最强的相关因素,但其他几个特质也具有独立于神经质的显著效应。更多地关注这些结构可以极大地促进心理病理学研究和临床实践。