Department of Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, USA.
Magn Reson Med. 2010 Sep;64(3):907-13. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22445.
Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) measured using dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI suffers from interpatient and interstudy variability for the same tissue type. Traditionally, when a more quantitative assessment of rCBV is required, as for comparison across studies and patients, the rCBV values are normalized to the rCBV in a reference region such as normal-appearing white matter. However, this technique of normalization is subjective and time consuming and introduces user-dependent variability. In this study, we demonstrate that a method called standardization, applied to rCBV maps, is an objective means of translating all rCBV values to a consistent scale. This approach reduces interpatient and interstudy variability for the same tissue type, thus enabling easy and accurate visual and quantitative comparison across studies. One caveat to this approach is that it is not appropriate for the evaluation of global changes in blood volume, since systematic differences are removed in the process of standardization.
相对脑血容量(rCBV)使用动态磁敏感对比 MRI 测量,对于同一组织类型,存在个体间和研究间的变异性。传统上,当需要对 rCBV 进行更定量的评估时,例如在研究和患者之间进行比较,需要将 rCBV 值标准化为参考区域(如正常表现的白质)中的 rCBV 值。然而,这种标准化技术是主观的,耗时且引入了用户依赖性的变异性。在这项研究中,我们证明了一种称为标准化的方法应用于 rCBV 图,是将所有 rCBV 值转换到一致尺度的客观手段。这种方法减少了同一组织类型的个体间和研究间的变异性,从而能够在研究之间进行简单、准确的视觉和定量比较。这种方法的一个注意事项是,它不适合评估总体血容量变化,因为在标准化过程中消除了系统差异。