Suppr超能文献

视觉空间选择性注意中的信号增强和抑制。

Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.

机构信息

School of Cognitive Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.

出版信息

Brain Res. 2010 Nov 4;1359:155-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.076. Epub 2010 Aug 31.

Abstract

Selective attention involves the relative enhancement of relevant versus irrelevant stimuli. However, whether this relative enhancement involves primarily enhancement of attended stimuli, or suppression of irrelevant stimuli, remains controversial. Moreover, if both enhancement and suppression are involved, whether they result from a single mechanism or separate mechanisms during attentional control or selection is not known. In two experiments using a spatial cuing paradigm with task-relevant targets and irrelevant distractors, target, and distractor processing was examined as a function of distractor expectancy. Additionally, in the second study the interaction of perceptual load and distractor expectancy was explored. In both experiments, distractors were either validly cued (70%) or invalidly cued (30%) in order to examine the effects of distractor expectancy on attentional control as well as target and distractor processing. The effects of distractor expectancy were assessed using event-related potentials recorded during the cue-to-target period (preparatory attention) and in response to the task-relevant target stimuli (selective stimulus processing). Analyses of distractor-present displays (anticipated versus unanticipated), showed modulations in brain activity during both the preparatory period and during target processing. The pattern of brain responses suggest both facilitation of attended targets and suppression of unattended distractors. These findings provide evidence for a two-process model of visual-spatial selective attention, where one mechanism (facilitation) influences relevant stimuli and another (suppression) acts to filter distracting stimuli.

摘要

选择性注意涉及相关刺激与不相关刺激的相对增强。然而,这种相对增强是主要涉及到注意刺激的增强,还是不相关刺激的抑制,仍然存在争议。此外,如果涉及到增强和抑制,在注意控制或选择过程中,它们是由单个机制还是分离的机制引起的,目前尚不清楚。在两项使用空间线索范式的实验中,使用与任务相关的目标和不相关的分心物作为实验材料,研究了目标和分心物的处理随分心物预期的变化。此外,在第二项研究中,还探讨了知觉负载和分心物预期的相互作用。在这两项实验中,分心物要么被有效地提示(70%),要么被无效地提示(30%),以检验分心物预期对注意控制以及目标和分心物处理的影响。使用在提示到目标期间(预备注意)和对任务相关的目标刺激(选择性刺激处理)期间记录的事件相关电位来评估分心物预期的影响。对存在分心物的显示(预期与非预期)的分析表明,在预备期和目标处理期间,大脑活动都发生了调制。大脑反应的模式表明,注意到的目标受到促进,未注意到的分心物受到抑制。这些发现为视觉空间选择性注意的双加工模型提供了证据,其中一个机制(促进)影响相关刺激,另一个机制(抑制)作用于过滤分心刺激。

相似文献

1
Signal enhancement and suppression during visual-spatial selective attention.
Brain Res. 2010 Nov 4;1359:155-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.076. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
2
Effects of attentional filtering demands on preparatory ERPs elicited in a spatial cueing task.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;120(6):1087-95. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 May 1.
3
Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting.
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;92(6):3538-45. doi: 10.1152/jn.00435.2004. Epub 2004 Jul 14.
4
Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.
J Neurosci. 2021 Apr 7;41(14):3180-3191. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2418-20.2021. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
5
Preparatory effects of distractor suppression: evidence from visual cortex.
PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e27700. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027700. Epub 2011 Dec 2.
7
Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 10;36(6):1797-807. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2133-15.2016.
8
Too little, too late, and in the wrong place: Alpha band activity does not reflect an active mechanism of selective attention.
Neuroimage. 2020 Oct 1;219:117006. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117006. Epub 2020 May 30.
9
Spatial Scaling of the Profile of Selective Attention in the Visual Field.
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 8;11(9):e0162190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162190. eCollection 2016.
10
Separate Cue- and Alpha-Related Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression.
J Neurosci. 2024 Jun 19;44(25):e1444232024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1444-23.2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Courses of Attended and Ignored Object Representations.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2023 Apr 1;35(4):645-658. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01972.
2
Statistical learning of target location and distractor location rely on different mechanisms during visual search.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Feb;85(2):342-365. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02626-9. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
5
Inhibition in selective attention.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2020 Mar;1464(1):204-221. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14304. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
6
Impoverished auditory cues limit engagement of brain networks controlling spatial selective attention.
Neuroimage. 2019 Nov 15;202:116151. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116151. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
8
Neural and Behavioral Correlates of Attentional Inhibition Training and Perceptual Discrimination Training in a Visual Flanker Task.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 May 23;12:191. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00191. eCollection 2018.
9
Exploring the impact of chronic high-altitude exposure on visual spatial attention using the ERP approach.
Brain Behav. 2018 Mar 25;8(5):e00944. doi: 10.1002/brb3.944. eCollection 2018 May.
10
Sensorineural hearing loss degrades behavioral and physiological measures of human spatial selective auditory attention.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 3;115(14):E3286-E3295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721226115. Epub 2018 Mar 19.

本文引用的文献

2
Effects of attentional filtering demands on preparatory ERPs elicited in a spatial cueing task.
Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;120(6):1087-95. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 May 1.
3
Implicit learning modulates selective attention at sensory levels of perceptual processing.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Feb;71(2):342-51. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.2.342.
4
A normalization model of attentional modulation of single unit responses.
PLoS One. 2009;4(2):e4651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004651. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
5
Perceptual-load-induced selection as a result of local competitive interactions in visual cortex.
Psychol Sci. 2008 Oct;19(10):1045-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02197.x.
6
Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain.
Vision Res. 2009 Jun;49(10):1154-65. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Aug 30.
7
Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
Neuropsychologia. 2008;46(7):2071-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Feb 13.
8
ERP correlates of anticipatory attention: spatial and non-spatial specificity and relation to subsequent selective attention.
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jun;188(1):45-62. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1338-4. Epub 2008 Mar 18.
9
When and where perceptual load interacts with voluntary visuospatial attention: an event-related potential and dipole modeling study.
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1345-55. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.068. Epub 2007 Oct 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验