School of Cognitive Science, Hampshire College, Amherst, MA 01002, USA.
Brain Res. 2010 Nov 4;1359:155-77. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.076. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
Selective attention involves the relative enhancement of relevant versus irrelevant stimuli. However, whether this relative enhancement involves primarily enhancement of attended stimuli, or suppression of irrelevant stimuli, remains controversial. Moreover, if both enhancement and suppression are involved, whether they result from a single mechanism or separate mechanisms during attentional control or selection is not known. In two experiments using a spatial cuing paradigm with task-relevant targets and irrelevant distractors, target, and distractor processing was examined as a function of distractor expectancy. Additionally, in the second study the interaction of perceptual load and distractor expectancy was explored. In both experiments, distractors were either validly cued (70%) or invalidly cued (30%) in order to examine the effects of distractor expectancy on attentional control as well as target and distractor processing. The effects of distractor expectancy were assessed using event-related potentials recorded during the cue-to-target period (preparatory attention) and in response to the task-relevant target stimuli (selective stimulus processing). Analyses of distractor-present displays (anticipated versus unanticipated), showed modulations in brain activity during both the preparatory period and during target processing. The pattern of brain responses suggest both facilitation of attended targets and suppression of unattended distractors. These findings provide evidence for a two-process model of visual-spatial selective attention, where one mechanism (facilitation) influences relevant stimuli and another (suppression) acts to filter distracting stimuli.
选择性注意涉及相关刺激与不相关刺激的相对增强。然而,这种相对增强是主要涉及到注意刺激的增强,还是不相关刺激的抑制,仍然存在争议。此外,如果涉及到增强和抑制,在注意控制或选择过程中,它们是由单个机制还是分离的机制引起的,目前尚不清楚。在两项使用空间线索范式的实验中,使用与任务相关的目标和不相关的分心物作为实验材料,研究了目标和分心物的处理随分心物预期的变化。此外,在第二项研究中,还探讨了知觉负载和分心物预期的相互作用。在这两项实验中,分心物要么被有效地提示(70%),要么被无效地提示(30%),以检验分心物预期对注意控制以及目标和分心物处理的影响。使用在提示到目标期间(预备注意)和对任务相关的目标刺激(选择性刺激处理)期间记录的事件相关电位来评估分心物预期的影响。对存在分心物的显示(预期与非预期)的分析表明,在预备期和目标处理期间,大脑活动都发生了调制。大脑反应的模式表明,注意到的目标受到促进,未注意到的分心物受到抑制。这些发现为视觉空间选择性注意的双加工模型提供了证据,其中一个机制(促进)影响相关刺激,另一个机制(抑制)作用于过滤分心刺激。