Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.
Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 3;115(14):E3286-E3295. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1721226115. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
Listeners with sensorineural hearing loss often have trouble understanding speech amid other voices. While poor spatial hearing is often implicated, direct evidence is weak; moreover, studies suggest that reduced audibility and degraded spectrotemporal coding may explain such problems. We hypothesized that poor spatial acuity leads to difficulty deploying selective attention, which normally filters out distracting sounds. In listeners with normal hearing, selective attention causes changes in the neural responses evoked by competing sounds, which can be used to quantify the effectiveness of attentional control. Here, we used behavior and electroencephalography to explore whether control of selective auditory attention is degraded in hearing-impaired (HI) listeners. Normal-hearing (NH) and HI listeners identified a simple melody presented simultaneously with two competing melodies, each simulated from different lateral angles. We quantified performance and attentional modulation of cortical responses evoked by these competing streams. Compared with NH listeners, HI listeners had poorer sensitivity to spatial cues, performed more poorly on the selective attention task, and showed less robust attentional modulation of cortical responses. Moreover, across NH and HI individuals, these measures were correlated. While both groups showed cortical suppression of distracting streams, this modulation was weaker in HI listeners, especially when attending to a target at midline, surrounded by competing streams. These findings suggest that hearing loss interferes with the ability to filter out sound sources based on location, contributing to communication difficulties in social situations. These findings also have implications for technologies aiming to use neural signals to guide hearing aid processing.
听众如果患有感觉神经性听力损失,通常很难在其他声音中理解言语。虽然空间听觉能力差通常是罪魁祸首,但直接证据却很薄弱;此外,研究表明,可听度降低和频谱时间编码恶化可能解释了这些问题。我们假设,空间辨别力差会导致选择性注意力难以集中,而选择性注意力通常可以滤除分散注意力的声音。在听力正常的听众中,选择性注意力会引起竞争声音引起的神经反应发生变化,这可以用来量化注意力控制的有效性。在这里,我们使用行为和脑电图来探索听力受损(HI)听众的选择性听觉注意力控制是否受损。正常听力(NH)和 HI 听众识别同时呈现的两个竞争旋律中的简单旋律,每个旋律都模拟来自不同的侧向角度。我们量化了这些竞争流引起的皮质反应的性能和注意力调制。与 NH 听众相比,HI 听众对空间线索的敏感性较差,在选择性注意任务中的表现较差,并且皮质反应的注意力调制不那么稳健。此外,NH 和 HI 个体的这些指标呈正相关。虽然两组人都表现出对分散注意力的声音的皮质抑制,但 HI 听众的抑制作用较弱,尤其是当他们在竞争声音的包围中关注中线目标时。这些发现表明听力损失干扰了基于位置过滤声源的能力,导致在社交情况下的交流困难。这些发现还对旨在使用神经信号来指导助听器处理的技术具有影响。