Suppr超能文献

一种记忆和组织辅助工具可提高阿尔茨海默病研究同意能力:一项随机对照试验的结果。

A memory and organizational aid improves Alzheimer disease research consent capacity: results of a randomized, controlled trial.

机构信息

Delaware Education Research and Development Center, University of Delaware School of Education, Newark, USA.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;18(12):1124-32. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181dd1c3b.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Early and progressive cognitive impairments of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) hinder their capacity to provide informed consent. Unfortunately, the limited research on techniques to improve capacity has shown mixed results. Therefore, the authors tested whether a memory and organizational aid improves the performance of patients with AD on measures of capacity and competency to give informed consent.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients with AD randomly assigned to standard consent or standard plus a memory and organizational aid.

INTERVENTION

Memory and organizational aid summarized the content of information mandated under the informed consent disclosure requirements of the Common Rule at a sixth grade reading level.

MEASUREMENTS

Three psychiatrists without access to patient data independently reviewed MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR) interview transcripts to judge whether the patient was capable of providing informed consent. The agreement of at least two of the three experts defined a participant as capable of providing informed consent. Secondary outcomes are MacCAT-CR measures of understanding, appreciation and reasoning, and comparison with cognitively normal older adult norms.

RESULTS

AD intervention and control groups were similar in terms of age, education, and cognitive status. The intervention group was more likely to be judged competent than control group and had higher scores on MacCAT-CR measure of understanding. The intervention had no effect on the measures of appreciation or reasoning.

CONCLUSIONS

A consent process that addresses the deficits in memory and attention of a patient with AD can improve capacity to give informed consent for early phase AD research. The results also validate the MacCAT-CR as an instrument to measure capacity, especially the understanding subscale.

TRIAL REGISTRY

ClinicalTrials.Gov#NCT00105612, http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00105612.

摘要

目的

阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的早期和进行性认知障碍阻碍了他们提供知情同意的能力。不幸的是,关于提高能力的技术的有限研究结果喜忧参半。因此,作者测试了记忆和组织辅助工具是否可以提高 AD 患者在能力和同意告知的能力方面的表现。

设计、地点和参与者:随机分配 AD 患者接受标准同意或标准加记忆和组织辅助。

干预措施

记忆和组织辅助工具以六年级阅读水平总结了《普通规则》规定的知情同意披露要求下的信息内容。

测量

三位没有访问患者数据的精神科医生独立审查 MacArthur 临床研究能力评估工具(MacCAT-CR)访谈记录,以判断患者是否有能力提供知情同意。至少两位专家的意见一致定义为有能力提供知情同意的参与者。次要结果是 MacCAT-CR 对理解、欣赏和推理的测量,以及与认知正常的老年成年人的标准进行比较。

结果

AD 干预组和对照组在年龄、教育和认知状况方面相似。干预组比对照组更有可能被判断为有能力,并且在 MacCAT-CR 理解测量上的得分更高。干预对欣赏或推理的测量没有影响。

结论

针对 AD 患者记忆和注意力缺陷的同意过程可以提高早期 AD 研究的知情同意能力。结果还验证了 MacCAT-CR 作为衡量能力的工具,特别是理解子量表。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.Gov#NCT00105612,http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00105612。

相似文献

2
Capacity to provide informed consent among adults with bipolar disorder.
J Affect Disord. 2019 Jan 1;242:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.049. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
3
Interpreting the clinical significance of capacity scores for informed consent in Alzheimer disease clinical trials.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;16(7):568-74. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e318172b406. Epub 2008 Jun 12.
4
Multimedia consent for research in people with schizophrenia and normal subjects: a randomized controlled trial.
Schizophr Bull. 2009 Jul;35(4):719-29. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbm148. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
6
Neuropsychological correlates of capacity determinations in Alzheimer disease: implications for assessment.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2013 Apr;21(4):373-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
7
Capacity to make treatment decisions in Chinese older persons with very mild dementia and mild Alzheimer disease.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009 May;17(5):428-36. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31819d3797.

引用本文的文献

2
Predictors of Decisional Capacity in Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Test Candidates.
Nurs Res. 2025;74(2):108-114. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000793. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
3
A randomized implementation trial to increase adoption of evidence-informed consent practices.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Dec 14;7(1):e28. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.520. eCollection 2023.
4
From paper to screen: regulatory and operational considerations for modernizing the informed consent process.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2022 Mar 28;6(1):e71. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.379. eCollection 2022.
5
Guardianship: A medicolegal review for clinicians.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Nov;70(11):3070-3079. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17797. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
6
Decision-Making Support for People With Alzheimer's Disease: A Narrative Review.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 12;12:750803. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.750803. eCollection 2021.
7
Supported Decision-Making in Persons With Dementia: Development of an Enhanced Consent Procedure for Lumbar Puncture.
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 16;12:780276. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.780276. eCollection 2021.
8
Understanding the Use of Optimal Formatting and Plain Language When Presenting Key Information in Clinical Trials.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2022 Feb-Apr;17(1-2):177-192. doi: 10.1177/15562646211037546. Epub 2021 Aug 19.
9
Anxiety Impacts Consent Capacity to Treatment in Alzheimer's Disease.
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 14;12:685430. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685430. eCollection 2021.
10
Assessment of capacity to give informed consent for medical assistance in dying: a qualitative study of clinicians' experience.
CMAJ Open. 2021 Apr 13;9(2):E358-E363. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20200136. Print 2021 Apr-Jun.

本文引用的文献

3
Alzheimer disease in the US population: prevalence estimates using the 2000 census.
Arch Neurol. 2003 Aug;60(8):1119-22. doi: 10.1001/archneur.60.8.1119.
10
Decisional capacity for informed consent in schizophrenia research.
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000 Jun;57(6):533-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.57.6.533.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验