Suppr超能文献

偏好评估中的问题行为:实证分析与实践建议。

Problem behavior during preference assessments: an empirical analysis and practical recommendations.

机构信息

University of Texas at Austin, Department of Special Education, College of Education, Austin, Texas 78712, USA.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Mar;43(1):137-41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-137.

Abstract

Preferences of 2 children with developmental disabilities, whose functional analyses indicated that their problem behavior was maintained by access to tangible items, were assessed using three formats (i.e., paired stimulus [PS], multiple-stimulus without replacement [MSWO], and free operant [FO]). The experimenter administered each format five times and compared levels of problem behavior across formats in a multielement design. Both participants exhibited problem behavior in PS and MSWO formats but not in the FO format. Results are discussed in terms of recommendations for practitioners.

摘要

对 2 名具有发育障碍的儿童的偏好进行了评估,他们的功能分析表明,他们的问题行为是通过获得有形物品来维持的,评估使用了三种格式(即配对刺激[PS]、无替换多刺激[MSWO]和自由操作[FO])。实验者对每种格式进行了五次管理,并在多项设计中比较了不同格式下问题行为的水平。两名参与者在 PS 和 MSWO 格式中都表现出问题行为,但在 FO 格式中没有。结果根据对从业者的建议进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Problem behavior during preference assessments: an empirical analysis and practical recommendations.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2010 Mar;43(1):137-41. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2010.43-137.
2
Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):835-46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-835.
3
Further refinement of video-based brief multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Jan;50(1):170-175. doi: 10.1002/jaba.358. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
5
The effects of preference assessment type on problem behavior.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Oct;50(4):861-866. doi: 10.1002/jaba.414. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
6
An evaluation of preference stability within MSWO preference assessments for children with autism.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2023 Jun;56(3):638-655. doi: 10.1002/jaba.988. Epub 2023 May 11.
7
Validity of the multiple-stimulus without replacement preference assessment for edible items.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2020 Jul;53(3):1688-1701. doi: 10.1002/jaba.703. Epub 2020 Apr 19.
8
Using pictures to assess reinforcers in individuals with developmental disabilities.
Behav Modif. 2003 Sep;27(4):470-83. doi: 10.1177/0145445503255602.
9
Comparing the results of one-session, two-session, and three-session MSWO preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Apr;54(2):700-712. doi: 10.1002/jaba.808. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
10
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.

引用本文的文献

1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):835-46. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-835.

本文引用的文献

2
Preference assessment procedures for individuals with developmental disabilities.
Behav Modif. 2004 Sep;28(5):668-77. doi: 10.1177/0145445503259836.
4
Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Winter;31(4):605-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-605.
5
Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1996 Winter;29(4):519-32; quiz 532-3. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1996.29-519.
6
Toward a functional analysis of self-injury.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1994 Summer;27(2):197-209. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-197.
7
The competition of autistic stereotyped behavior with usual and specially assessed reinforcers.
Res Dev Disabil. 1987;8(4):607-26. doi: 10.1016/0891-4222(87)90056-4.
8
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验