• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
2
Examination of Ethical Decision-Making Models Across Disciplines: Common Elements and Application to the Field of Behavior Analysis.跨学科的伦理决策模型审视:共同要素及其在行为分析领域的应用
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Nov 29;16(3):657-671. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00753-1. eCollection 2023 Sep.
3
When Rules Are Not Enough: Developing Principles to Guide Ethical Conduct.当规则并不足够时:制定指导道德行为的原则
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Oct 23;14(2):491-498. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00515-x. eCollection 2021 Jun.
4
Continuum of Care Screener: A Risk Mitigation Tool to Guide Decision Making When Environmental Factors Affect Service Delivery.连续护理筛查工具:一种在环境因素影响服务提供时用于指导决策的风险缓解工具。
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Feb 8;15(2):495-504. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00672-7. eCollection 2022 Jun.
5
Description of a practitioner model for identifying preferred stimuli with individuals with autism spectrum disorders.描述一种用于识别自闭症谱系障碍个体的偏好刺激的从业者模型。
Behav Modif. 2011 Jul;35(4):347-69. doi: 10.1177/0145445511405184.
6
Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review.刺激回避评估:一项系统的文献综述。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Feb 26;47(1):139-166. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00398-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
BACB Certification Trends: State of the States (1999 to 2014).行为分析师认证委员会认证趋势:各州状况(1999年至2014年)
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Mar 28;9(3):243-52. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0118-z. eCollection 2016 Sep.
8
Ethical Behavior Analysis: Evidence-Based Practice as a Framework for Ethical Decision Making.伦理行为分析:以循证实践作为伦理决策的框架
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Oct 18;15(2):619-634. doi: 10.1007/s40617-021-00658-5. eCollection 2022 Jun.
9
A Preliminary Assessment of the Qualities and Behaviors of Exemplary Practitioners: Perspectives From U.S.-Based Behavior Analysts.模范从业者的品质与行为的初步评估:来自美国行为分析师的视角
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Jan 4;14(2):342-351. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00522-y. eCollection 2021 Jun.
10
Future Directions of Training and Fieldwork in Diversity Issues in Applied Behavior Analysis.应用行为分析中多样性问题的培训与实地工作的未来方向
Behav Anal Pract. 2019 Apr 8;12(4):767-776. doi: 10.1007/s40617-019-00349-2. eCollection 2019 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
A Review of the Environmental Variables Included in Mand Training Interventions.对纳入强制性训练干预措施的环境变量的综述。
Anal Verbal Behav. 2024 Dec 6;40(2):345-378. doi: 10.1007/s40616-024-00211-9. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Using a Group Stimulus Preference Assessment to Design an Effective Group Contingency.使用团体刺激偏好评估来设计有效的团体应急措施。
Behav Anal Pract. 2024 Oct 17;17(4):1008-1022. doi: 10.1007/s40617-024-01003-2. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Applied Behavior Analysis and the Abolitionist Neurodiversity Critique: An Ethical Analysis.应用行为分析与废奴主义神经多样性批判:一项伦理分析。
Behav Anal Pract. 2023 Mar 2;16(4):1-17. doi: 10.1007/s40617-023-00780-6.
4
Advancing Methods in Animal-Assisted Intervention: Demonstration of Starting Points in Clinical Practice for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.动物辅助干预的先进方法:自闭症谱系障碍儿童临床实践起点的示范
Behav Anal Pract. 2022 Apr 11;16(1):145-155. doi: 10.1007/s40617-022-00704-w. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
The Effects of Email Performance-Based Feedback on Teacher Candidate Implementation of a Multiple Stimulus Without Replacement Preference Assessment.基于电子邮件绩效反馈对教师候选人实施无替换多重刺激偏好评估的影响。
J Behav Educ. 2022 Nov 2:1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10864-022-09496-z.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of preference assessment type on problem behavior.偏好评估类型对问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Oct;50(4):861-866. doi: 10.1002/jaba.414. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.刺激呈现与大小对偏好的影响。
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Sep 21;10(2):172-177. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0148-6. eCollection 2017 Jun.
3
Preference and reinforcer efficacy of high- and low-tech items: A comparison of item type and duration of access.高科技与低科技物品的偏好及强化物效能:物品类型与使用时长的比较
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Apr;50(2):222-237. doi: 10.1002/jaba.383. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
4
Restricted Interests and Autism: Further Assessment of Preferences for a Variety of Leisure Items.受限兴趣与自闭症:对多种休闲物品偏好的进一步评估
Behav Modif. 2018 Jan;42(1):108-125. doi: 10.1177/0145445516686301. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
5
Assessing the efficacy of pictorial preference assessments for children with developmental disabilities.评估针对发育障碍儿童的图片偏好评估的有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Dec;49(4):848-868. doi: 10.1002/jaba.342. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
6
A comparison of preference-assessment methods.偏好评估方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Jun;49(2):265-85. doi: 10.1002/jaba.302. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.可食用强化物与休闲强化物的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Summer;48(2):331-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.200. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Clinical decision making and preference assessment for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities.临床决策与智力和发育障碍个体的偏好评估。
Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2014 Mar;119(2):151-70. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-119.2.151.
9
Evaluation of assessment methods for identifying social reinforcers.评估识别社会强化物的方法的评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):113-35. doi: 10.1002/jaba.107.
10
An evaluation of the effects of access duration on preference assessment outcomes.评价访问时间长短对偏好评估结果的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Spring;47(1):209-13. doi: 10.1002/jaba.100. Epub 2014 Feb 17.

刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型

Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

作者信息

Lill Jordan D, Shriver Mark D, Allen Keith D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Munroe-Meyer Institute for Genetics and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5450 USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.

DOI:10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3
PMID:34868818
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8586311/
Abstract

A stimulus preference assessment (SPA) is a fundamental tool used by practitioners to predict stimuli that function as reinforcers. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) requires that all certified behavior analysts and behavioral technicians be trained in SPA methodology (BACB, 2017). SPA procedures are used by nearly 9 out of 10 behavior analysts in the field (Graff & Karsten, 2012). Over the last 4 decades, there has been a litany of research on SPA procedures. Despite the universality of training, application, and research, discussions on the selection of SPA procedures have been sparse. Two peer-reviewed articles have focused on clinical decision making in the selection of SPA procedures. Karsten et al. (2011) introduced an in situ decision-making model, whereas Virues-Ortega et al. (2014) developed an a priori algorithm based on client and stimuli characteristics. The SPADS addresses the limitations of prior models by considering the effects of stimuli dimensions, client characteristics, relative administration times, and the outcomes agreement between two potentially efficacious, context-specfic SPA procedures.

摘要

刺激偏好评估(SPA)是从业者用于预测作为强化物的刺激的基本工具。行为分析师认证委员会(BACB)要求所有认证行为分析师和行为技术员接受SPA方法的培训(BACB,2017)。该领域近十分之九的行为分析师使用SPA程序(Graff & Karsten,2012)。在过去40年里,对SPA程序进行了大量研究。尽管培训、应用和研究具有普遍性,但关于SPA程序选择的讨论却很少。有两篇同行评审文章关注了SPA程序选择中的临床决策。Karsten等人(2011)引入了一种现场决策模型,而Virues-Ortega等人(2014)基于客户和刺激特征开发了一种先验算法。SPADS通过考虑刺激维度、客户特征、相对施用时间以及两种潜在有效、针对具体情境的SPA程序之间的结果一致性,解决了先前模型的局限性。