Suppr超能文献

刺激偏好评估决策系统(SPADS):从业者的决策模型

Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

作者信息

Lill Jordan D, Shriver Mark D, Allen Keith D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Munroe-Meyer Institute for Genetics and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5450 USA.

出版信息

Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.

Abstract

A stimulus preference assessment (SPA) is a fundamental tool used by practitioners to predict stimuli that function as reinforcers. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) requires that all certified behavior analysts and behavioral technicians be trained in SPA methodology (BACB, 2017). SPA procedures are used by nearly 9 out of 10 behavior analysts in the field (Graff & Karsten, 2012). Over the last 4 decades, there has been a litany of research on SPA procedures. Despite the universality of training, application, and research, discussions on the selection of SPA procedures have been sparse. Two peer-reviewed articles have focused on clinical decision making in the selection of SPA procedures. Karsten et al. (2011) introduced an in situ decision-making model, whereas Virues-Ortega et al. (2014) developed an a priori algorithm based on client and stimuli characteristics. The SPADS addresses the limitations of prior models by considering the effects of stimuli dimensions, client characteristics, relative administration times, and the outcomes agreement between two potentially efficacious, context-specfic SPA procedures.

摘要

刺激偏好评估(SPA)是从业者用于预测作为强化物的刺激的基本工具。行为分析师认证委员会(BACB)要求所有认证行为分析师和行为技术员接受SPA方法的培训(BACB,2017)。该领域近十分之九的行为分析师使用SPA程序(Graff & Karsten,2012)。在过去40年里,对SPA程序进行了大量研究。尽管培训、应用和研究具有普遍性,但关于SPA程序选择的讨论却很少。有两篇同行评审文章关注了SPA程序选择中的临床决策。Karsten等人(2011)引入了一种现场决策模型,而Virues-Ortega等人(2014)基于客户和刺激特征开发了一种先验算法。SPADS通过考虑刺激维度、客户特征、相对施用时间以及两种潜在有效、针对具体情境的SPA程序之间的结果一致性,解决了先前模型的局限性。

相似文献

3
When Rules Are Not Enough: Developing Principles to Guide Ethical Conduct.当规则并不足够时:制定指导道德行为的原则
Behav Anal Pract. 2020 Oct 23;14(2):491-498. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00515-x. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Stimulus Avoidance Assessment: A Systematic Literature Review.刺激回避评估:一项系统的文献综述。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Feb 26;47(1):139-166. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00398-1. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
BACB Certification Trends: State of the States (1999 to 2014).行为分析师认证委员会认证趋势:各州状况(1999年至2014年)
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Mar 28;9(3):243-52. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0118-z. eCollection 2016 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
The effects of preference assessment type on problem behavior.偏好评估类型对问题行为的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2017 Oct;50(4):861-866. doi: 10.1002/jaba.414. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
2
The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.刺激呈现与大小对偏好的影响。
Behav Anal Pract. 2016 Sep 21;10(2):172-177. doi: 10.1007/s40617-016-0148-6. eCollection 2017 Jun.
6
A comparison of preference-assessment methods.偏好评估方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2016 Jun;49(2):265-85. doi: 10.1002/jaba.302. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
7
Comparison of edible and leisure reinforcers.可食用强化物与休闲强化物的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2015 Summer;48(2):331-43. doi: 10.1002/jaba.200. Epub 2015 Apr 17.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验