Lill Jordan D, Shriver Mark D, Allen Keith D
Department of Psychology, Munroe-Meyer Institute for Genetics and Rehabilitation, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198-5450 USA.
Behav Anal Pract. 2021 Apr 30;14(4):1144-1156. doi: 10.1007/s40617-020-00539-3. eCollection 2021 Dec.
A stimulus preference assessment (SPA) is a fundamental tool used by practitioners to predict stimuli that function as reinforcers. The Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) requires that all certified behavior analysts and behavioral technicians be trained in SPA methodology (BACB, 2017). SPA procedures are used by nearly 9 out of 10 behavior analysts in the field (Graff & Karsten, 2012). Over the last 4 decades, there has been a litany of research on SPA procedures. Despite the universality of training, application, and research, discussions on the selection of SPA procedures have been sparse. Two peer-reviewed articles have focused on clinical decision making in the selection of SPA procedures. Karsten et al. (2011) introduced an in situ decision-making model, whereas Virues-Ortega et al. (2014) developed an a priori algorithm based on client and stimuli characteristics. The SPADS addresses the limitations of prior models by considering the effects of stimuli dimensions, client characteristics, relative administration times, and the outcomes agreement between two potentially efficacious, context-specfic SPA procedures.
刺激偏好评估(SPA)是从业者用于预测作为强化物的刺激的基本工具。行为分析师认证委员会(BACB)要求所有认证行为分析师和行为技术员接受SPA方法的培训(BACB,2017)。该领域近十分之九的行为分析师使用SPA程序(Graff & Karsten,2012)。在过去40年里,对SPA程序进行了大量研究。尽管培训、应用和研究具有普遍性,但关于SPA程序选择的讨论却很少。有两篇同行评审文章关注了SPA程序选择中的临床决策。Karsten等人(2011)引入了一种现场决策模型,而Virues-Ortega等人(2014)基于客户和刺激特征开发了一种先验算法。SPADS通过考虑刺激维度、客户特征、相对施用时间以及两种潜在有效、针对具体情境的SPA程序之间的结果一致性,解决了先前模型的局限性。