• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Interactions between Global Health Initiatives and country health systems: the case of a neglected tropical diseases control program in Mali.全球卫生倡议与国家卫生系统之间的相互作用:以马里的一种被忽视热带病控制规划为例。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Aug 17;4(8):e798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000798.
2
Implementing preventive chemotherapy through an integrated National Neglected Tropical Disease Control Program in Mali.在马里实施国家被忽视热带病综合防治规划中的预防化疗。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(3):e1574. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001574. Epub 2012 Mar 20.
3
Tuberculosis结核病
4
A mixed methods approach to evaluating community drug distributor performance in the control of neglected tropical diseases.一种用于评估社区药品分发商在控制被忽视热带病方面表现的混合方法。
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Jun 16;9(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1606-2.
5
Impact of global health governance on country health systems: the case of HIV initiatives in Nigeria.全球卫生治理对国家卫生系统的影响:以尼日利亚的艾滋病防治举措为例。
J Glob Health. 2015 Jun;5(1):010407. doi: 10.7189/jogh.05.010407.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Extent of Integration of Priority Interventions into General Health Systems: A Case Study of Neglected Tropical Diseases Programme in the Western Region of Ghana.优先干预措施融入一般卫生系统的程度:以加纳西部地区被忽视热带病项目为例
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016 May 20;10(5):e0004725. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004725. eCollection 2016 May.
8
Tetanus toxoid immunization campaign in West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.印度尼西亚西努沙登加拉省的破伤风类毒素免疫接种运动。
Assignment Child. 1985(69-72):369-80.
9
Global health initiatives in Africa - governance, priorities, harmonisation and alignment.非洲的全球卫生倡议——治理、优先事项、协调与一致性
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 18;16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):212. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1448-9.
10
An analytical perspective of Global health initiatives in Tanzania and Zambia.坦桑尼亚和赞比亚全球卫生倡议的分析视角
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jul 18;16 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):223. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1449-8.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of Mainstreaming Mass Drug Administration for Schistosomiasis and Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis in Four Districts of Nigeria.尼日利亚四个地区将大规模药物驱虫纳入血吸虫病和土壤传播性蠕虫病主流的混合方法评估。
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2024 Apr 9;111(3_Suppl):69-80. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.23-0600. Print 2024 Sep 3.
2
Integrating health intervention into existing program structure of the neglected tropical diseases: lessons learned from Yobe and Ebonyi states.将卫生干预措施纳入被忽视热带病现有规划结构中:来自约贝州和埃邦伊州的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 17;11:1281091. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281091. eCollection 2023.
3
Delivery strategies for malaria vaccination in areas with seasonal malaria transmission.疟疾传播季节性地区的疟疾疫苗接种交付策略。
BMJ Glob Health. 2023 May;8(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-011838.
4
Country perspectives on improving technical assistance in the health sector.各国对改善卫生部门技术援助的看法。
Gates Open Res. 2021 Aug 24;5:141. doi: 10.12688/gatesopenres.13248.1. eCollection 2021.
5
Assessing the effects of disease-specific programs on health systems: An analysis of the Bangladesh Lymphatic Filariasis Elimination Program's impacts on health service coverage and catastrophic health expenditure.评估疾病专项规划对卫生系统的影响:孟加拉国淋巴丝虫病消除规划对卫生服务覆盖面和灾难性卫生支出影响的分析。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021 Nov 23;15(11):e0009894. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009894. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
30 years of polio campaigns in Ethiopia, India and Nigeria: the impacts of campaign design on vaccine hesitancy and health worker motivation.30 年来埃塞俄比亚、印度和尼日利亚的脊髓灰质炎运动:运动设计对疫苗犹豫和卫生工作者积极性的影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Aug;6(8). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-006002.
7
A call to action for universal health coverage: Why we need to address gender inequities in the neglected tropical diseases community.全民健康覆盖的行动呼吁:为何我们需要解决被忽视热带病领域的性别不平等问题。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020 Mar 12;14(3):e0007786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007786. eCollection 2020 Mar.
8
Building the capacity of users and producers of evidence in health policy and systems research for better control of endemic diseases in Nigeria: a situational analysis.在尼日利亚,为更好地控制地方性疾病,对卫生政策和体系研究中证据的使用者和生产者进行能力建设:现状分析。
Global Health. 2019 Nov 21;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0530-6.
9
Elimination of lymphatic filariasis: current perspectives on mass drug administration.消除淋巴丝虫病:群体服药的当前观点
Res Rep Trop Med. 2018 Mar 6;9:25-33. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S125204. eCollection 2018.
10
Ensuring no one is left behind: Urgent action required to address implementation challenges for NTD control and elimination.确保不让任何人掉队:应对被忽视热带病控制与消除工作实施挑战需采取紧急行动。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018 Jun 7;12(6):e0006426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0006426. eCollection 2018 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Venice statement: global health initiatives and health systems.威尼斯声明:全球卫生倡议与卫生系统
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):10-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61195-8.
2
Augmenting frameworks for appraising the practices of community-based health interventions.增强评估社区卫生干预实践的框架。
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Sep;24(5):335-41. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp028. Epub 2009 Jun 23.
3
An assessment of interactions between global health initiatives and country health systems.对全球卫生倡议与国家卫生系统之间相互作用的评估。
Lancet. 2009 Jun 20;373(9681):2137-69. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60919-3.
4
Financing of global health: tracking development assistance for health from 1990 to 2007.全球卫生筹资:追踪1990年至2007年的卫生发展援助
Lancet. 2009 Jun 20;373(9681):2113-24. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60881-3.
5
The effects of global health initiatives on country health systems: a review of the evidence from HIV/AIDS control.全球卫生倡议对国家卫生系统的影响:基于艾滋病控制证据的综述
Health Policy Plan. 2009 Jul;24(4):239-52. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czp025. Epub 2009 Jun 2.
6
Rescuing the bottom billion through control of neglected tropical diseases.通过控制被忽视的热带病拯救最底层的十亿人。
Lancet. 2009 May 2;373(9674):1570-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60233-6.
7
Global health actors claim to support health system strengthening: is this reality or rhetoric?全球卫生行动者声称支持加强卫生系统:这是现实还是言辞?
PLoS Med. 2009 Apr 28;6(4):e1000059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000059.
8
What impact do Global Health Initiatives have on human resources for antiretroviral treatment roll-out? A qualitative policy analysis of implementation processes in Zambia.全球卫生倡议对开展抗逆转录病毒治疗的人力资源有何影响?赞比亚实施过程的定性政策分析。
Hum Resour Health. 2009 Feb 10;7:8. doi: 10.1186/1478-4491-7-8.
9
Programme activities: a major burden for district health systems?项目活动:对地区卫生系统来说是一项重大负担吗?
Trop Med Int Health. 2008 Dec;13(12):1430-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2008.02174.x. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
10
Critically appraising qualitative research.批判性评价定性研究。
BMJ. 2008 Aug 7;337:a1035. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1035.

全球卫生倡议与国家卫生系统之间的相互作用:以马里的一种被忽视热带病控制规划为例。

Interactions between Global Health Initiatives and country health systems: the case of a neglected tropical diseases control program in Mali.

机构信息

Public Health Department, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2010 Aug 17;4(8):e798. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000798.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pntd.0000798
PMID:20808908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2923152/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recently, a number of Global Health Initiatives (GHI) have been created to address single disease issues in low-income countries, such as poliomyelitis, trachoma, neonatal tetanus, etc.. Empirical evidence on the effects of such GHIs on local health systems remains scarce. This paper explores positive and negative effects of the Integrated Neglected Tropical Disease (NTD) Control Initiative, consisting in mass preventive chemotherapy for five targeted NTDs, on Mali's health system where it was first implemented in 2007.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Campaign processes and interactions with the health system were assessed through participant observation in two rural districts (8 health centres each). Information was complemented by interviews with key informants, website search and literature review. Preliminary results were validated during feedback sessions with Malian authorities from national, regional and district levels. We present positive and negative effects of the NTD campaign on the health system using the WHO framework of analysis based on six interrelated elements: health service delivery, health workforce, health information system, drug procurement system, financing and governance. At point of delivery, campaign-related workload severely interfered with routine care delivery which was cut down or totally interrupted during the campaign, as nurses were absent from their health centre for campaign-related activities. Only 2 of the 16 health centres, characterized by a qualified, stable and motivated workforce, were able to keep routine services running and to use the campaign as an opportunity for quality improvement. Increased workload was compensated by allowances, which significantly improved staff income, but also contributed to divert attention away from core routine activities. While the campaign increased the availability of NTD drugs at country level, parallel systems for drug supply and evaluation requested extra efforts burdening local health systems. The campaign budget barely financed institutional strengthening. Finally, though the initiative rested at least partially on national structures, pressures to absorb donated drugs and reach short-term coverage results contributed to distract energies away from other priorities, including overall health systems strengthening.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that positive synergies between disease specific interventions and nontargeted health services are more likely to occur in robust health services and systems. Disease-specific interventions implemented as parallel activities in fragile health services may further weaken their responsiveness to community needs, especially when several GHIs operate simultaneously. Health system strengthening will not result from the sum of selective global interventions but requires a comprehensive approach.

摘要

背景

最近,为了解决低收入国家的单一疾病问题,如脊髓灰质炎、沙眼、新生儿破伤风等,创建了多个全球卫生倡议 (GHI)。关于此类 GHIs 对当地卫生系统影响的实证证据仍然很少。本文探讨了 2007 年首次在马里实施的综合被忽视的热带病 (NTD) 控制倡议的积极和消极影响,该倡议包括针对五种目标 NTD 的大规模预防性化疗。

方法和发现

通过在两个农村地区(每个地区 8 个卫生中心)的参与式观察评估了运动进程及其与卫生系统的相互作用。通过与国家、地区和地区各级的马里当局进行反馈会议,对信息进行了补充。采访了主要信息提供者、网站搜索和文献综述。初步结果在与马里当局的反馈会议中得到了验证。我们使用世界卫生组织基于六个相互关联的要素的分析框架来展示 NTD 运动对卫生系统的积极和消极影响:卫生服务提供、卫生人力、卫生信息系统、药物采购系统、融资和治理。在服务提供点,与运动相关的工作量严重干扰了常规护理的提供,在运动期间,护士因与运动相关的活动而不在其卫生中心,常规护理被削减或完全中断。只有 16 个卫生中心中的 2 个,其特点是拥有合格、稳定和有动力的劳动力,能够维持常规服务的运行,并将运动作为提高质量的机会。增加的工作量通过津贴得到补偿,这大大提高了工作人员的收入,但也导致他们的注意力从核心常规活动上转移开。虽然运动增加了国家一级 NTD 药物的可获得性,但并行的药物供应和评估系统需要额外的努力,给当地卫生系统带来负担。运动预算几乎没有为机构加强提供资金。最后,尽管该倡议至少部分依赖于国家结构,但吸收捐赠药物和实现短期覆盖结果的压力导致精力从其他优先事项上分散,包括整体卫生系统的加强。

结论

我们的研究表明,在健全的卫生服务和系统中,针对特定疾病的干预措施与非目标卫生服务之间更有可能产生积极的协同作用。在脆弱的卫生服务中作为并行活动实施的针对特定疾病的干预措施可能会进一步削弱其对社区需求的响应能力,特别是当同时开展多个 GHIs 时。卫生系统的加强不会来自于有选择的全球干预措施的总和,而是需要采取全面的方法。