Health Policy Research Group, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
Department of Health Administration and Management, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu-Campus, Enugu, Nigeria.
Global Health. 2019 Nov 21;15(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s12992-019-0530-6.
There is a current need to build the capacity of Health Policy and Systems Research + Analysis (HPSR+A) in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) as this enhances the processes of decision-making at all levels of the health system. This paper provides information on the HPSR+A knowledge and practice among producers and users of evidence in priority setting for HPSR+A regarding control of endemic diseases in two states in Nigeria. It also highlights the HPSR+A capacity building needs and interventions that will lead to increased HPSR+A and use for actual policy and decision making by the government and other policy actors.
Data was collected from 96 purposively selected respondents who are either researchers/ academia (producers of evidence) and policy/decision-makers, programme/project managers (users of evidence) in Enugu and Anambra states, southeast Nigeria. A pre-tested questionnaire was the data collection tool. Analysis was by univariate and bivariate analyses.
The knowledge on HPSR+A was moderate and many respondents understood the importance of evidence-based decision making. Majority of researcher stated their preferred channel of dissemination of research finding to be journal publication. The mean percentage of using HPSR evidence for programme design & implementation of endemic disease among users of evidence was poor (18.8%) in both states. There is a high level of awareness of the use of evidence to inform policy across the two states and some of the respondents have used some evidence in their work.
The high level of awareness of the use of HPSR+A evidence for decision making did not translate to the significant actual use of evidence for policy making. The major reasons bordered on lack of autonomy in decision making. Hence, the existing yawning gap in use of evidence has to be bridged for a strengthening of the health system with evidence.
目前需要在中低收入国家(LMICs)培养卫生政策和系统研究+分析(HPSR+A)的能力,因为这可以增强卫生系统各级决策过程。本文提供了在尼日利亚两个州进行卫生政策和系统研究+分析优先事项制定方面,生产者和使用者在 HPSR+A 方面的知识和实践情况,重点介绍了 HPSR+A 能力建设需求和干预措施,这些需求和干预措施将导致 HPSR+A 的增加以及政府和其他政策行为者实际政策和决策的使用。
从 96 名有目的地选择的受访者中收集数据,这些受访者是研究人员/学术界(证据生产者)和政策/决策者、项目/项目经理(证据使用者),他们分别来自尼日利亚东南部的埃努古州和阿南布拉州。使用预测试问卷作为数据收集工具。分析采用单变量和双变量分析。
HPSR+A 的知识水平中等,许多受访者理解循证决策的重要性。大多数研究人员表示,他们首选的研究结果传播渠道是期刊发表。在这两个州,使用者将 HPSR 证据用于疾病规划和实施的平均百分比都很低(18.8%)。两个州都高度意识到利用证据来为政策提供信息,并且一些受访者已经在他们的工作中使用了一些证据。
尽管高度意识到利用 HPSR+A 证据进行决策,但并没有转化为对政策制定的实际证据的大量使用。主要原因是决策缺乏自主权。因此,必须弥合现有证据使用方面的巨大差距,以便在证据的基础上加强卫生系统。