相似文献
1
The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: a case study.
PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 17;7(8):e1000318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000318.
2
Cancer research and the $90 billion metaphor.
Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1540-1. doi: 10.1126/science.331.6024.1540-a.
3
What is scientific misconduct, who has to (dis)prove it, and to what level of certainty?
Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):493-510.
4
Scientific misconduct and liability for the acts of others.
Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):477-91.
5
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0029-8.
6
Research misconduct oversight: defining case costs.
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Winter;40(2):75-99.
7
Soft responses to misconduct.
Nature. 2002 Nov 21;420(6913):253. doi: 10.1038/420253a.
8
Scientific misconduct. Chained to the bench.
Nature. 1990 Nov 1;348(6296):8. doi: 10.1038/348008a0.
9
Scientific misconduct. NIH staffer finds warm reception on other side.
Nature. 1992 Jan 9;355(6356):98. doi: 10.1038/355098b0.
10
Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
Science. 1990 Apr 20;248(4953):297. doi: 10.1126/science.2326642.
引用本文的文献
1
The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations: A New Era for Global Health Law in Pandemic Preparedness and Response?
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):47-50. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.16. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct.
Res Ethics. 2025 Jan;21(1):1-8. doi: 10.1177/17470161241254052. Epub 2024 May 11.
3
Universal pictures: A lithophane codex helps teenagers with blindness visualize nanoscopic systems.
Sci Adv. 2024 Jan 12;10(2):eadj8099. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj8099. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Jul 4;29(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00442-4.
5
Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing: Part 2: Off-Label Marketing-Consequences for Patients, Clinicians, and Researchers.
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2023 Mar 27;8(3):359-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.12.012. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Effect of medical researchers' creative performance on scientific misconduct: a moral psychology perspective.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 18;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00876-8.
7
Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE).
Scientometrics. 2022;127(12):7487-7497. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04400-y. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
8
Assessing research misconduct in Iran: a perspective from Iranian medical faculty members.
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00642-2.
9
Psychometric properties of Persian version of the research misconduct questionnaire (PRMQ).
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020 Nov 10;13:18. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i18.4826. eCollection 2020.
10
COVID-19 research: pandemic "paperdemic", integrity, values and risks of the "speed science".
Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jun 10;5(2):174-187. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
The specter of fraud.
Sci Am. 2009 Jul;301(1):24-5. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0709-24.
2
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
3
Tattered threads.
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1361-3. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a16846.
4
Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.
Fed Regist. 2005 May 17;70(94):28369-400.
Zotero 插件