研究不端行为的成本和被低估的后果：案例研究。
The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: a case study.
机构信息
Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States of America.
出版信息
PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 17;7(8):e1000318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000318.
Abstract
Arthur Michalek and colleagues explore the consequences of scientific misconduct and, using a single case as an illustration, estimate that direct costs can approach US$525,000, although total costs are likely to be higher.
摘要
亚瑟·米哈莱克（Arthur Michalek）及其同事探讨了科研不端行为的后果，并通过一个案例估算直接成本可能接近 52.5 万美元，尽管总费用可能更高。
相似文献
1
The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: a case study.研究不端行为的成本和被低估的后果：案例研究。
PLoS Med. 2010 Aug 17;7(8):e1000318. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000318.
2
Cancer research and the $90 billion metaphor.癌症研究与900亿美元的隐喻。
Science. 2011 Mar 25;331(6024):1540-1. doi: 10.1126/science.331.6024.1540-a.
3
What is scientific misconduct, who has to (dis)prove it, and to what level of certainty?什么是科研不端行为？谁必须（反）证它？要达到何种确定程度？
Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):493-510.
4
Scientific misconduct and liability for the acts of others.科研不端行为及他人行为的责任
Med Law. 2007 Sep;26(3):477-91.
5
Evolving research misconduct policies and their significance for physical scientists.不断发展的科研不端行为政策及其对物理科学家的意义。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2000 Jan;6(1):109-21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0029-8.
6
Research misconduct oversight: defining case costs.科研不端行为监督：界定案件成本。
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Winter;40(2):75-99.
7
Soft responses to misconduct.对不当行为的温和回应。
Nature. 2002 Nov 21;420(6913):253. doi: 10.1038/420253a.
8
Scientific misconduct. Chained to the bench.科研不端行为。被困在实验台前。
Nature. 1990 Nov 1;348(6296):8. doi: 10.1038/348008a0.
9
Scientific misconduct. NIH staffer finds warm reception on other side.科研不端行为。美国国立卫生研究院工作人员在另一边受到热烈欢迎。
Nature. 1992 Jan 9;355(6356):98. doi: 10.1038/355098b0.
10
Scientific misconduct cases revealed.
Science. 1990 Apr 20;248(4953):297. doi: 10.1126/science.2326642.
引用本文的文献
1
The 2024 Amendments to the International Health Regulations: A New Era for Global Health Law in Pandemic Preparedness and Response?《国际卫生条例（2024年）修正案：大流行防范与应对中全球卫生法的新时代？》
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):47-50. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.16. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
2
Guidance needed for using artificial intelligence to screen journal submissions for misconduct.使用人工智能筛选期刊投稿中的不当行为所需的指导。
Res Ethics. 2025 Jan;21(1):1-8. doi: 10.1177/17470161241254052. Epub 2024 May 11.
3
Universal pictures: A lithophane codex helps teenagers with blindness visualize nanoscopic systems.环球影业：利用光刻浮雕石版帮助失明青少年想象纳米系统。
Sci Adv. 2024 Jan 12;10(2):eadj8099. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adj8099. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
4
What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?撤稿通知揭示了哪些与撤稿相关指控的机构调查有关的信息？
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Jul 4;29(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00442-4.
5
Off-Label Use vs Off-Label Marketing: Part 2: Off-Label Marketing-Consequences for Patients, Clinicians, and Researchers.药品未按批准用途使用与药品未按批准用途营销：第2部分：药品未按批准用途营销对患者、临床医生和研究人员的影响
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2023 Mar 27;8(3):359-370. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.12.012. eCollection 2023 Mar.
6
Effect of medical researchers' creative performance on scientific misconduct: a moral psychology perspective.医学研究者的创造力表现对科研不端行为的影响：道德心理学视角。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 18;23(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00876-8.
7
Essential signals in publication trends and collaboration patterns in global Research Integrity and Research Ethics (RIRE).全球研究诚信与研究伦理（RIRE）领域出版趋势和合作模式中的关键信号。
Scientometrics. 2022;127(12):7487-7497. doi: 10.1007/s11192-022-04400-y. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
8
Assessing research misconduct in Iran: a perspective from Iranian medical faculty members.评估伊朗的科研不端行为：伊朗医学教师的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00642-2.
9
Psychometric properties of Persian version of the research misconduct questionnaire (PRMQ).研究行为不端调查问卷波斯语版（PRMQ）的心理测量特性。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020 Nov 10;13:18. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i18.4826. eCollection 2020.
10
COVID-19 research: pandemic "paperdemic", integrity, values and risks of the "speed science".新冠疫情研究：大流行、“论文洪流”、“快速科研”的诚信、价值观与风险
Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jun 10;5(2):174-187. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754. eCollection 2020.
本文引用的文献
1
The specter of fraud.欺诈的幽灵。
Sci Am. 2009 Jul;301(1):24-5. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0709-24.
2
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据？对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
3
Tattered threads.破烂的线
Anesth Analg. 2009 May;108(5):1361-3. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a16846.
4
Public Health Service policies on research misconduct. Final rule.公共卫生服务部关于研究不当行为的政策。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2005 May 17;70(94):28369-400.
Zotero 插件