Habibi Roojin, Eccleston-Turner Mark, Burci Gian Luca
Faculty of Law (Common Law Section), University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
King's College London, London, England, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
J Law Med Ethics. 2025;53(S1):47-50. doi: 10.1017/jme.2025.16. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
On June 1, 2024, the World Health Assembly reached consensus on a package of amendments to the 2005 International Health Regulations (IHR). These amendments follow nearly two decades of implementation and an intensive multilateral process prompted by the global struggle against COVID-19. This article critically examines whether the amended IHR reflect lessons learned from the pandemic, potentially ushering in a new era for global health law in pandemic preparedness and response, or if they deflect attention from the need for deeper structural reforms. While the IHR remain the only near-universal legal framework for preventing and addressing the international spread of disease, these amendments emphasize equity and solidarity, and potentially shift the IHR from a technical instrument to one focusing on inherently political issues. This analysis examines key IHR amendments and their implications for the future of global health law, particularly in the context of equity, financing, and implementation.
2024年6月1日,世界卫生大会就《2005年国际卫生条例》(IHR)的一揽子修正案达成共识。这些修正案是在《国际卫生条例》实施近二十年后,以及全球抗击新冠疫情推动的密集多边进程之后出台的。本文批判性地审视了修订后的《国际卫生条例》是否吸取了疫情教训,是否有可能为全球卫生法在大流行防范和应对方面开启一个新时代,或者它们是否转移了人们对进行更深入结构性改革必要性的关注。虽然《国际卫生条例》仍然是预防和应对疾病国际传播的唯一近乎普遍适用的法律框架,但这些修正案强调公平与团结,并有可能将《国际卫生条例》从一项技术工具转变为一项关注固有政治问题的工具。本分析审视了《国际卫生条例》的关键修正案及其对全球卫生法未来的影响,特别是在公平、融资和实施方面。