• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科研不端行为监督:界定案件成本。

Research misconduct oversight: defining case costs.

作者信息

Gammon Elizabeth, Franzini Luisa

机构信息

Health Systems Management Program, School of Health and Human Services, College of Public Affairs, University of Baltimore, USA.

Management, Policy and Community Health, University of Texas School of Public Health, USA.

出版信息

J Health Care Finance. 2013 Winter;40(2):75-99.

PMID:24551963
Abstract

This study uses a sequential mixed method study design to define cost elements of research misconduct among faculty at academic medical centers. Using time driven activity based costing, the model estimates a per case cost for 17 cases of research misconduct reported by the Office of Research Integrity for the period of 2000-2005. Per case cost of research misconduct was found to range from $116,160 to $2,192,620. Research misconduct cost drivers are identified.

摘要

本研究采用序贯混合研究设计来确定学术医疗中心教职员工研究不端行为的成本要素。该模型运用基于时间驱动作业成本法,估算了研究诚信办公室在2000年至2005年期间报告的17起研究不端行为的单例成本。研究发现,研究不端行为的单例成本在116,160美元至2,192,620美元之间。同时还确定了研究不端行为的成本驱动因素。

相似文献

1
Research misconduct oversight: defining case costs.科研不端行为监督:界定案件成本。
J Health Care Finance. 2013 Winter;40(2):75-99.
2
Tie funding to research integrity.将资金与研究诚信挂钩。
Nature. 2010 Jul 22;466(7305):436-7. doi: 10.1038/466436a.
3
Soft responses to misconduct.对不当行为的温和回应。
Nature. 2002 Nov 21;420(6913):253. doi: 10.1038/420253a.
4
Ethics opinion: conflicts of interest in presentations and publications and dietetics research.伦理意见:演讲、出版物及营养学研究中的利益冲突
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Jan;106(1):27-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2005.11.011.
5
What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists' misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists.科研行为责任方面的指导与培训和科学家的不当行为有何关系?来自一项对美国国立卫生研究院资助科学家的全国性调查的结果。
Acad Med. 2007 Sep;82(9):853-60. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f764c.
6
Integrity: how to measure breaches effectively.
Nature. 2008 Jul 31;454(7204):575; author reply 575. doi: 10.1038/454575a.
7
Teaching responsible conduct of research.传授科研的负责任行为。
Lancet. 2009 Nov 7;374(9701):1568. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61931-0.
8
Is drug research trustworthy? The pharmaceutical industry funnels money to prominent scientists who are doing research that affects its products--and nobody can stop it.药物研究值得信赖吗?制药行业将资金投入到从事影响其产品研究的知名科学家身上——而没有人能够阻止这一行为。
Sci Am. 2012 Dec;307(6):56-63.
9
Research misconduct involving noncompliance in human subjects research supported by the public health service: reconciling separate regulatory systems.涉及公共卫生服务支持的人体研究中违规行为的研究不端行为:协调不同的监管体系。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jul-Aug;44(4 Spec No):S2-26. doi: 10.1002/hast.336.
10
In defense of information or defenders of the faith.
Surgery. 1991 Aug;110(2):121-6.

引用本文的文献

1
What do Retraction Notices Reveal About Institutional Investigations into Allegations Underlying Retractions?撤稿通知揭示了哪些与撤稿相关指控的机构调查有关的信息?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 Jul 4;29(4):25. doi: 10.1007/s11948-023-00442-4.
2
Activity-Based Costing of Intensity-Modulated Proton versus Photon Therapy for Oropharyngeal Cancer.基于活动的口咽癌调强质子治疗与光子治疗成本核算
Int J Part Ther. 2021 Jun 25;8(1):374-382. doi: 10.14338/IJPT-20-00042.1. eCollection 2021 Summer.
3
Assessing research misconduct in Iran: a perspective from Iranian medical faculty members.
评估伊朗的科研不端行为:伊朗医学教师的观点。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Jun 21;22(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00642-2.
4
Psychometric properties of Persian version of the research misconduct questionnaire (PRMQ).研究行为不端调查问卷波斯语版(PRMQ)的心理测量特性。
J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2020 Nov 10;13:18. doi: 10.18502/jmehm.v13i18.4826. eCollection 2020.
5
COVID-19 research: pandemic "paperdemic", integrity, values and risks of the "speed science".新冠疫情研究:大流行、“论文洪流”、“快速科研”的诚信、价值观与风险
Forensic Sci Res. 2020 Jun 10;5(2):174-187. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2020.1767754. eCollection 2020.
6
Questionable, Objectionable or Criminal? Public Opinion on Data Fraud and Selective Reporting in Science.可疑、不可接受还是犯罪?公众对科学数据造假和选择性报告的看法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Feb;24(1):151-171. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9886-2. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
7
Defining the value framework for prostate brachytherapy using patient-centered outcome metrics and time-driven activity-based costing.使用以患者为中心的结果指标和基于时间驱动作业成本法来定义前列腺近距离放射治疗的价值框架。
Brachytherapy. 2016 May-Jun;15(3):274-282. doi: 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
8
Financial costs and personal consequences of research misconduct resulting in retracted publications.研究不端行为导致论文被撤回所带来的经济成本和个人后果。
Elife. 2014 Aug 14;3:e02956. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02956.