Jefferson Center for Applied Research on Aging and Health, Thomas Jefferson University, 130 S Ninth St, Ste 513, Philadelphia, PA 19130, USA.
JAMA. 2010 Sep 1;304(9):983-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1253.
Optimal treatment to postpone functional decline in patients with dementia is not established.
To test a nonpharmacologic intervention realigning environmental demands with patient capabilities.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective 2-group randomized trial (Care of Persons with Dementia in their Environments [COPE]) involving patients with dementia and family caregivers (community-living dyads) recruited from March 2006 through June 2008 in Pennsylvania.
Up to 12 home or telephone contacts over 4 months by health professionals who assessed patient capabilities and deficits; obtained blood and urine samples; and trained families in home safety, simplifying tasks, and stress reduction. Control group caregivers received 3 telephone calls and educational materials.
Functional dependence, quality of life, frequency of agitated behaviors, and engagement for patients and well-being, confidence using activities, and perceived benefits for caregivers at 4 months.
Of 284 dyads screened, 270 (95%) were eligible and 237 (88%) randomized. Data were collected from 209 dyads (88%) at 4 months and 173 (73%) at 9 months. At 4 months, compared with controls, COPE patients had less functional dependence (adjusted mean difference, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.03-0.44; P = .02; Cohen d = 0.21) and less dependence in instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted mean difference, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.09-0.55; P = .007; Cohen d = 0.43), measured by a 15-item scale modeled after the Functional Independence Measure; COPE patients also had improved engagement (adjusted mean difference, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.07-0.22; P = .03; Cohen d = 0.26), measured by a 5-item scale. COPE caregivers improved in their well-being (adjusted mean difference in Perceived Change Index, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.08-0.36; P = .002; Cohen d = 0.30) and confidence using activities (adjusted mean difference, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.30-1.32; P = .002; Cohen d = 0.54), measured by a 5-item scale. By 4 months, 64 COPE dyads (62.7%) vs 48 control group dyads (44.9%) eliminated 1 or more caregiver-identified problems (chi(2/1) = 6.72, P = . 01).
Among community-living dyads, a nonpharmacologic biobehavioral environmental intervention compared with control resulted in better outcomes for COPE dyads at 4 months. Although no group differences were observed at 9 months for patients, COPE caregivers perceived greater benefits.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00259454.
目前尚无明确的最佳治疗方案可以延缓痴呆患者的功能下降。
测试一种非药物干预方法,该方法重新调整环境需求以适应患者的能力。
设计、地点和参与者:前瞻性 2 组随机试验(COPE:关爱环境中的痴呆患者),涉及宾夕法尼亚州 2006 年 3 月至 2008 年 6 月期间招募的痴呆患者及其家庭照顾者(社区居住的二人组)。
健康专业人员在 4 个月内最多进行 12 次家访或电话访问,评估患者的能力和缺陷;采集血液和尿液样本;并培训家庭进行家庭安全、简化任务和减轻压力。对照组的照顾者接受 3 次电话和教育材料。
4 个月时患者的功能依赖、生活质量、激越行为频率和参与度,以及照顾者的健康状况、使用活动的信心和感知益处。
在筛选的 284 对中,270 对(95%)符合条件,237 对(88%)被随机分配。209 对(88%)在 4 个月时和 173 对(73%)在 9 个月时收集了数据。与对照组相比,COPE 组患者的功能依赖程度更低(调整后的平均差异为 0.24;95%CI,0.03-0.44;P=0.02;Cohen d=0.21),日常生活活动的依赖性更低(调整后的平均差异为 0.32;95%CI,0.09-0.55;P=0.007;Cohen d=0.43),使用的是根据功能独立性量表改编的 15 项量表;COPE 组患者的参与度也有所提高(调整后的平均差异为 0.12;95%CI,0.07-0.22;P=0.03;Cohen d=0.26),使用的是 5 项量表。COPE 组的照顾者在幸福感(感知变化指数的平均差异,0.22;95%CI,0.08-0.36;P=0.002;Cohen d=0.30)和使用活动的信心(平均差异,0.81;95%CI,0.30-1.32;P=0.002;Cohen d=0.54)方面有所改善,使用的是 5 项量表。在 4 个月时,64 对 COPE 组(62.7%)与 48 对对照组(44.9%)消除了 1 个或多个照顾者识别的问题(卡方检验/自由度=6.72,P=0.01)。
在社区居住的二人组中,与对照组相比,非药物生物行为环境干预在 4 个月时为 COPE 组带来了更好的结果。尽管患者在 9 个月时没有观察到组间差异,但 COPE 组的照顾者认为受益更大。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00259454。