Jefferson Center for Applied Research on Aging and Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19130, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Aug;58(8):1465-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.02971.x. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
To test the effects of an intervention that helps families manage distressing behaviors in family members with dementia.
Two-group randomized trial.
In home.
Two hundred seventy-two caregivers and people with dementia.
Up to 11 home and telephone contacts over 16 weeks by health professionals who identified potential triggers of patient behaviors, including communication and environmental factors and patient undiagnosed medical conditions (by obtaining blood and urine samples) and trained caregivers in strategies to modify triggers and reduce their upset. Between 16 and 24 weeks, three telephone contacts reinforced strategy use.
Primary outcomes were frequency of targeted problem behavior and caregiver upset with and confidence managing it at 16 weeks. Secondary outcomes were caregiver well-being and management skills at 16 and 24 weeks and caregiver perceived benefits. Prevalence of medical conditions for intervention patients were also examined.
At 16 weeks, 67.5% of intervention caregivers reported improvement in targeted problem behavior, compared with 45.8% of caregivers in a no-treatment control group (P=.002), and reduced upset with (P=.03) and enhanced confidence managing (P=.01) the behavior. Additionally, intervention caregivers reported less upset with all problem behaviors (P=.001), less negative communication (P=.02), less burden (P=.05), and better well-being (P=.001) than controls. Fewer intervention caregivers had depressive symptoms (53.0%) than control group caregivers (67.8%, P=.02). Similar caregiver outcomes occurred at 24 weeks. Intervention caregivers perceived more study benefits (P<.05), including ability to keep family members home, than controls. Blood and urine samples of intervention patients with dementia showed that 40 (34.1%) had undiagnosed illnesses requiring physician follow-up.
Targeting behaviors upsetting to caregivers and modifying potential triggers improves symptomatology in people with dementia and caregiver well-being and skills.
测试一项干预措施的效果,该措施有助于家庭管理痴呆症患者的困扰行为。
两组随机试验。
家庭。
272 名护理人员和痴呆症患者。
在 16 周内,由健康专业人员提供多达 11 次家访和电话联系,他们确定了患者行为的潜在触发因素,包括沟通和环境因素以及患者未确诊的医疗状况(通过获取血液和尿液样本),并培训护理人员使用策略来改变触发因素并减轻其困扰。在 16 至 24 周期间,进行了三次电话联系以加强策略的使用。
主要结果是 16 周时目标行为问题的频率和护理人员对此的困扰程度以及管理能力。次要结果是 16 和 24 周时护理人员的健康状况和管理技能以及护理人员感知的益处。还检查了干预患者的医疗状况患病率。
在 16 周时,与未接受治疗的对照组(45.8%)相比,干预组的 67.5%护理人员报告目标行为问题有所改善(P=.002),对行为的困扰程度降低(P=.03),管理能力增强(P=.01)。此外,与对照组相比,干预组护理人员报告对所有行为问题的困扰程度较低(P=.001),沟通更积极(P=.02),负担更轻(P=.05),健康状况更好(P=.001)。与对照组相比,干预组护理人员的抑郁症状(53.0%)较少(67.8%,P=.02)。在 24 周时也出现了类似的护理人员结果。干预组护理人员感知到更多的研究益处(P<.05),包括能够让家庭成员留在家里的能力,而对照组则没有。对接受干预的痴呆症患者的血液和尿液样本进行检查发现,40 名(34.1%)患者患有未确诊的疾病,需要医生随访。
针对令护理人员困扰的行为并改变潜在的触发因素,可以改善痴呆症患者的症状和护理人员的健康状况和技能。