Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CRIR), Montreal, Canada.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010 Nov;52(11):e245-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03768.x. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
The goal of this study was to contribute evidence towards the effectiveness of task-oriented training with and without restriction of trunk movement (trunk restraint) on the quality of upper limb movement in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
We used a prospective, single-subject research design in 12 children (three males, nine females; aged 6-11 y; median 9 y) with di-, hemi-, or quadriplegia. Movements of the most affected arm were assessed five times: three times before training, immediately after training, and 3 months after training. The main outcome measures were the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (Melbourne) and upper limb movement kinematics during a functional reaching task. Children were randomly allocated to one of two groups: task-oriented training with or without trunk restraint. Treatment consisted of three 1-hour sessions per week for 5 weeks (total training duration 15 h). Treatment effects were determined using single-subject research design analysis--regression through baseline data and standard mean differences.
Although the Melbourne scores were largely unchanged after training, some children in each group improved arm trajectory smoothness (effect size 0.55-1.87), and most children improved elbow extension range (effect size 0.55-4.79). However, more children in the trunk restraint group than in the no restraint group demonstrated reduced trunk displacement (effect size 0.94-2.25) and longer-term improvements in elbow extension and trunk use. Among the group who underwent training without trunk restraint, trunk displacement was unchanged or increased, and fewer carry-over effects were apparent at follow-up.
This proof-of-principle study showed that greater improvement in the quality of upper limb movement in children with CP, including less compensatory trunk use and better carry-over effects, was achieved by training with trunk restraint.
本研究旨在为任务导向训练对脑瘫儿童上肢运动质量的有效性提供证据,该训练可结合(躯干约束)或不结合限制躯干运动。
我们采用前瞻性、单病例研究设计,纳入 12 名儿童(3 名男性,9 名女性;年龄 6-11 岁;中位数 9 岁),他们患有双瘫、偏瘫或四肢瘫。最受累上肢的运动评估了 5 次:训练前 3 次,训练后即刻 1 次,训练后 3 个月 1 次。主要结局指标为墨尔本单侧上肢功能评估(Melbourne)和功能性上肢伸展任务中的上肢运动运动学。儿童随机分配到两组中的一组:有或无躯干约束的任务导向训练。治疗包括每周 3 次,每次 1 小时,共 5 周(总治疗持续时间 15 小时)。使用单病例研究设计分析-通过基线数据和标准均值差异进行回归来确定治疗效果。
尽管训练后 Melbourne 评分基本不变,但每组中的一些儿童上肢运动轨迹的平滑度都有所改善(效应量 0.55-1.87),大多数儿童的肘部伸展范围都有所改善(效应量 0.55-4.79)。然而,与无躯干约束组相比,躯干约束组中有更多的儿童显示出减少的躯干位移(效应量 0.94-2.25),以及更长时间的肘部伸展和躯干使用的改善。在未接受躯干约束训练的组中,躯干位移不变或增加,且在随访时,更明显的后续效果减少。
这项初步研究表明,通过躯干约束训练,脑瘫儿童上肢运动质量的改善更大,包括减少代偿性躯干使用和更好的后续效果。