• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估腹股沟疝修补术核心结局的简易问卷。

Simple questionnaire for assessing core outcomes in inguinal hernia repair.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Loëstrasse 170, 7000 Chur, Switzerland.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):148-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7236. Epub 2010 Sep 2.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.7236
PMID:20814965
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient-oriented questionnaires are indispensable in the assessment of surgical outcome. The psychometric properties of a brief multidimensional instrument were examined in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing surgery.

METHODS

Fifty-one patients (mean(s.d.) age 50·6(17·4) years; 48 men) participated. The following questionnaire properties were assessed for the Core Outcome Measures Index adapted for patients with hernia (COMI-hernia) and the EuroQol: practicability, floor and ceiling effects, test-retest reliability (over 2 weeks), construct validity (by comparison with other relevant scales) and responsiveness 9 months after surgery as standardized response mean (SRM).

RESULTS

The questionnaires were easy to implement and well accepted by the patients. Ceiling effects at baseline were 2 per cent for the COMI-hernia, 8 per cent for EuroQol-visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) and 35 per cent for EuroQol-Five Dimensions (EQ-5D); no instrument showed floor effects. The reproducibility of individual COMI-hernia items was good, with test-retest differences within one grade ranging from 41 of 45 for 'social/work disability' to 44 of 45 for 'general quality of life'. The intraclass correlation coefficients were moderately high for COMI-hernia (0·74) and EQ-VAS (0·77), but low for EQ-5D (0·43). COMI-hernia scores correlated in the expected manner with related scales (r = 0·42-0·72, P < 0·050). COMI-hernia was the most responsive instrument (SRM 1·42).

CONCLUSION

The COMI-hernia and EQ-VAS general health scale represent reliable, valid and sensitive tools for assessing multidimensional outcome in patients with inguinal hernia undergoing surgical treatment.

摘要

背景

以患者为导向的问卷在评估手术结果方面不可或缺。本研究旨在评估一种简短多维工具的心理测量特性,该工具用于评估接受手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者。

方法

51 名患者(平均(标准差)年龄 50.6(17.4)岁;48 名男性)参与了研究。评估了改良后的核心结局测量指标(COMI-hernia)和欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)的以下问卷特性:实用性、天花板和地板效应、两周内的重测信度、结构有效性(与其他相关量表比较)和 9 个月后的反应度(以标准化反应均数表示)。

结果

问卷易于实施,且患者接受度良好。COMI-hernia 在基线时的天花板效应为 2%,EQ-VAS 为 8%,EQ-5D 为 35%;无仪器显示地板效应。COMI-hernia 各个项目的可重复性较好,两次测试之间的差异在一个等级内,范围从“社会/工作障碍”的 41 分至 45 分,到“一般生活质量”的 44 分至 45 分。COMI-hernia 的组内相关系数为 0.74,EQ-VAS 为 0.77,而 EQ-5D 为 0.43,均为中度高。COMI-hernia 评分与相关量表呈预期相关(r = 0.42-0.72,P < 0.050)。COMI-hernia 是最敏感的工具(SRM 1.42)。

结论

COMI-hernia 和 EQ-VAS 一般健康量表是评估接受手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者多维结局的可靠、有效和敏感的工具。

相似文献

1
Simple questionnaire for assessing core outcomes in inguinal hernia repair.评估腹股沟疝修补术核心结局的简易问卷。
Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):148-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7236. Epub 2010 Sep 2.
2
[Comparison between two methods of inguinal hernia surgery--Lichtenstein and Desarda].两种腹股沟疝手术方法的比较——利chtenstein法与德萨尔达法
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2008 May;24(143):392-5.
3
First results of Lichtenstein hernia repair with Ultrapro-mesh as cost saving procedure--quality control combined with a modified quality of life questionnaire (SF-36) in a series of ambulatory operated patients.采用超普网片行李chtenstein疝修补术作为节省成本手术的初步结果——对一系列门诊手术患者结合改良生活质量问卷(SF-36)进行质量控制
Eur J Med Res. 2004 Jun 30;9(6):323-7.
4
[Does inguinal hernia repair influence on quality of life of elderly males?].腹股沟疝修补术对老年男性生活质量有影响吗?
Ann Acad Med Stetin. 2007;53(3):74-81.
5
Early results of inguinal hernia repair by the 'mesh plug' technique--first 200 cases.“网塞”技术修补腹股沟疝的早期结果——首批200例病例
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 Nov;82(6):396-400.
6
Quality of life in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.接受腹股沟疝修补术患者的生活质量
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1997 Jan;79(1):40-5.
7
[Quality of life after inguinal hernia operation--results of a prospective study (Shouldice, Lichtenstein, TAPP)].腹股沟疝手术后的生活质量——一项前瞻性研究的结果(Shouldice术、Lichtenstein术、经腹腹膜前修补术)
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1998;115:1020-3.
8
[The Lichtenstein inguinal hernia-plasty: a simple and complication-free technique, especially suited for ambulatory surgery].[利chtenstein腹股沟疝修补术:一种简单且无并发症的技术,特别适用于门诊手术]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:603-6.
9
[Valenti method (PAD) as an assesment of polypropylene mesh fixing standarization in inguinal hernia repair].[瓦伦蒂方法(PAD)用于评估腹股沟疝修补术中聚丙烯网片固定的标准化]
Folia Med Cracov. 2008;49(1-2):3-9.
10
Laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair with alloplastic material: do the subjective and objective parameters differ in the long-term course?使用异体材料的腹腔镜和开放腹股沟疝修补术:长期过程中主观和客观参数是否存在差异?
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2008 Oct;18(5):457-63. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31817f4d70.

引用本文的文献

1
Groin hernia.腹股沟疝
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2025 Jul 3;11(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41572-025-00631-4.
2
The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) comes of age: 18 years of efficient and effective patient-reported outcome measurement in the field of spinal disorders. Part 2. COMI item-content, scoring, language versions, and applications.核心结局指标索引(COMI)步入成年:脊柱疾病领域18年高效且有效的患者报告结局测量。第2部分。COMI的条目内容、评分、语言版本及应用。
Eur Spine J. 2025 May 21. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-08847-4.
3
A COSMIN systematic review of generic patient-reported outcome measures in Switzerland.
一项关于瑞士通用患者报告结局指标的COSMIN系统评价。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Apr 7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-03942-x.
4
Long-term follow-up and operative performance metrics of inguinal hernioplasty training in the Dominican Republic.多米尼加共和国腹股沟疝修补术培训的长期随访及手术操作指标
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):99. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03286-y.
5
A Content Framework of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Detecting Early Adverse Events After Major Abdominal Surgery.一种新型的患者报告结局测量工具的内容框架,用于检测腹部大手术后的早期不良事件。
World J Surg. 2023 Nov;47(11):2676-2687. doi: 10.1007/s00268-023-07143-w. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
6
Long-term Follow-up of Patients With Hernia Using the Hernia-Specific Quality-of-Life Mobile App: Feasibility Questionnaire Study.使用特定疝气生活质量移动应用程序对疝气患者进行长期随访:可行性问卷调查研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Oct 19;6(10):e39759. doi: 10.2196/39759.
7
Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation Reduces Pathological Sensation of Mesh One Week after Open Inguinal Hernia Surgery: Follow-Up Results from a Randomized, Double Blind and Placebo-Controlled Trial.经皮神经电刺激在开放式腹股沟疝手术后一周减轻网片相关感觉异常:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的随访结果。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 May 28;58(6):725. doi: 10.3390/medicina58060725.
8
Predictors of low quality of life after open inguinal hernia repair using the EuraHS-QoL score: prospective multicentric cohort study across 33 hospitals.使用EuraHS-QoL评分评估开放腹股沟疝修补术后生活质量低下的预测因素:一项在33家医院开展的前瞻性多中心队列研究
Hernia. 2022 Feb;26(1):225-232. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02498-2. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
9
Prioritization criteria of patients on scheduled waiting lists for abdominal wall hernia surgery: a cross-sectional study.计划性腹壁疝手术候补患者的优先排序标准:一项横断面研究。
Hernia. 2021 Dec;25(6):1659-1666. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02378-9. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
10
Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review.患者报告结局测量在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用趋势:一项定量系统评价。
Hernia. 2021 Oct;25(5):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02322-3. Epub 2020 Oct 19.