Centre for Sleep Health and Research, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, NSW, Australia.
Sleep. 2010 Aug;33(8):1075-80. doi: 10.1093/sleep/33.8.1075.
To explore differences in craniofacial structures and obesity between Caucasian and Chinese patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).
Inter-ethnic comparison study.
Two sleep disorder clinics in Australia and Hong Kong.
150 patients with OSA (74 Caucasian, 76 Chinese).
Anthropometry, cephalometry, and polysomnography were performed and compared. Subgroup analyses after matching for: (1) body mass index (BMI); (2) OSA severity.
The mean age and BMI were similar between the ethnic groups. Chinese patients had more severe OSA (AHI 35.3 vs 25.2 events/h, P = 0.005). They also had more craniofacial bony restriction, including a shorter cranial base (63.6 +/- 3.3 vs 77.5 +/- 6.7 mm, P < 0.001), maxilla (50.7 +/- 3.7 vs 58.8 +/- 4.3 mm, P < 0.001) and mandible length (65.4 +/- 4.2 vs 77.9 +/- 9.4 mm, P < 0.001). These findings remained after correction for differences in body height. Similar results were shown in the BMI-matched analysis (n = 66). When matched for OSA severity (n = 52), Chinese patients had more craniofacial bony restriction, but Caucasian patients were more overweight (BMI 30.7 vs 28.4 kg/m2, P = 0.03) and had a larger neck circumference (40.8 vs 39.1 cm, P = 0.004); however, the ratios of BMI to the mandible or maxilla size were similar.
Craniofacial factors and obesity contribute differentially to OSA in Caucasian and Chinese patients. For the same degree of OSA severity, Caucasians were more overweight, whereas Chinese exhibited more craniofacial bony restriction.
探讨白种人和中国人阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者颅面结构和肥胖的差异。
种族间比较研究。
澳大利亚和中国香港的两个睡眠障碍诊所。
150 名 OSA 患者(74 名白种人,76 名中国人)。
进行人体测量、头颅测量和多导睡眠图检查,并进行比较。在匹配:(1)体重指数(BMI);(2)OSA 严重程度后进行亚组分析。
两组患者的平均年龄和 BMI 相似。中国患者 OSA 更严重(AHI 35.3 比 25.2 次/小时,P = 0.005)。他们的颅面骨性限制也更严重,包括颅底更短(63.6 +/- 3.3 比 77.5 +/- 6.7 毫米,P < 0.001)、上颌骨(50.7 +/- 3.7 比 58.8 +/- 4.3 毫米,P < 0.001)和下颌骨长度(65.4 +/- 4.2 比 77.9 +/- 9.4 毫米,P < 0.001)。这些发现在校正了身高差异后仍然存在。在 BMI 匹配分析(n = 66)中也显示出类似的结果。当按 OSA 严重程度匹配(n = 52)时,中国患者的颅面骨性限制更严重,但白种人患者超重更多(BMI 30.7 比 28.4 kg/m2,P = 0.03),颈围更大(40.8 比 39.1 厘米,P = 0.004);然而,BMI 与下颌骨或上颌骨大小的比值相似。
颅面因素和肥胖对白种人和中国人的 OSA 有不同的影响。在相同程度的 OSA 严重程度下,白种人患者更肥胖,而中国人患者表现出更多的颅面骨性限制。