• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者和家属为中心的治疗升级计划评估:替代不复苏流程。

A patient and relative centred evaluation of treatment escalation plans: a replacement for the do-not-resuscitate process.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Torbay Hospital, Torquay, Devon, UK

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):518-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033977.

DOI:10.1136/jme.2009.033977
PMID:20817818
Abstract

The Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) was introduced into our trust in an attempt to improve patient involvement and experience of their treatment in hospital and to embrace and clarify a wider remit of treatment options than the Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order currently offers. Our experience suggests that the patient and family are rarely engaged in DNR discussions. This is acutely relevant considering that the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) now obliges these discussions to take place. The TEP is a form that the doctor completes, ideally with the competent patient or close relative, documenting what treatment options would be appropriate if that patient were to become acutely unwell. Ventilation of the lungs, cardiac resuscitation, renal replacement therapy, intravenous fluids and antibiotics are all discussed. The study evaluated patient and relative experiences with the TEP. 55 patients or their relatives were interviewed regarding their experience of the TEP and thoughts regarding the process. 96% of patients and relatives evaluated thought that the TEP was a good idea. Free text comments were all positive and only 34% of patients claimed to feel anxious when completing the form. Following this study, the TEP has been expanded hospital wide and into the community within our trust. Discussions are currently taking place in hospitals within our region to introduce the TEP form into other local trusts.

摘要

治疗升级计划(TEP)被引入我们的信托基金,旨在改善患者在医院治疗过程中的参与度和体验,并接受和明确更广泛的治疗选择范围,而不仅仅是目前的不复苏(DNR)医嘱。我们的经验表明,患者及其家属很少参与 DNR 讨论。考虑到《精神能力法案》(MCA)现在要求进行这些讨论,这一点就显得尤为重要。TEP 是医生填写的表格,理想情况下由有能力的患者或近亲填写,记录如果该患者突然病情恶化,哪些治疗选择是合适的。讨论了肺部通气、心脏复苏、肾脏替代治疗、静脉输液和抗生素等。该研究评估了患者及其家属对 TEP 的体验。对 55 名患者或其家属进行了采访,了解他们对 TEP 的体验以及对这一过程的看法。96%的患者和家属认为 TEP 是个好主意。患者填写表格时只有 34%感到焦虑。在这项研究之后,TEP 在我们的信托基金中已在全院范围内和社区范围内得到推广。目前正在我们所在地区的医院内进行讨论,以将 TEP 表格引入其他当地信托基金。

相似文献

1
A patient and relative centred evaluation of treatment escalation plans: a replacement for the do-not-resuscitate process.以患者和家属为中心的治疗升级计划评估:替代不复苏流程。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):518-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033977.
2
Involving patients in discussions of do-not-resuscitate orders.让患者参与关于“不要复苏”医嘱的讨论。
Prof Nurse. 2002 Apr;17(8):465-8.
3
The do-not-resuscitate order in teaching hospitals.教学医院中的“不要复苏”医嘱。
JAMA. 1985 Apr 19;253(15):2236-9.
4
Do-not-resuscitate orders in the critically ill patient--an observational study with special emphasis on withholding of renal replacement therapy.危重症患者的“不要复苏”医嘱——一项特别关注肾脏替代治疗停用情况的观察性研究
Acta Clin Belg. 2008 Jul-Aug;63(4):221-6. doi: 10.1179/acb.2008.041.
5
Decision to resuscitate or not in patients with chronic diseases.慢性病患者是否进行心肺复苏的决策。
Dan Med J. 2012 Jan;59(1):A4353.
6
Resuscitation in cancer. Comparison of patient and health staff preferences.癌症患者的复苏。患者与医护人员偏好的比较。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1994 Jul;16(4):277-85. doi: 10.1016/0163-8343(94)90007-8.
7
Do-not-resuscitate orders for critically ill patients in the hospital. How are they used and what is their impact?医院中针对重症患者的“不要复苏”医嘱。这些医嘱是如何使用的,以及它们有什么影响?
JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):233-7.
8
The surrogate's experience in authorizing a do not resuscitate order.代理人签署“不要复苏”医嘱的经历。
Palliat Support Care. 2008 Mar;6(1):13-9. doi: 10.1017/S1478951508000035.
9
Evaluation of patient, physician, nurse, and family attitudes toward do not resuscitate orders.评估患者、医生、护士及家属对放弃心肺复苏医嘱的态度。
Arch Intern Med. 1990 Mar;150(3):653-8.
10
How old is too old (or too young) to resuscitate?多大年龄进行复苏太老(或太年轻)了?
Br J Nurs. 2006;15(5):299.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving Completion Rates of Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) in a London Teaching Hospital: A Quality Improvement Study.提高伦敦一家教学医院治疗升级计划(TEP)的完成率:一项质量改进研究。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 26;15(11):e49434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49434. eCollection 2023 Nov.
2
"Do not resuscitate" order and end-of-life treatment in a cohort of deceased in a Norwegian University Hospital.“不复苏”医嘱与挪威某大学医院死亡患者的临终治疗。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2022 Sep;66(8):1009-1015. doi: 10.1111/aas.14104. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
3
Exploring moral distress among critical care nurses at a private hospital in Kwa-Zulu Natal, South Africa.
探索南非夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省一家私立医院重症监护护士的道德困扰。
South Afr J Crit Care. 2020 Dec 1;36(2). doi: 10.7196/SAJCC.2020.v36i2.435. eCollection 2020.
4
Implementation of treatment escalation plans in an old age psychiatry inpatient hospital.老年精神病学住院医院中治疗升级计划的实施。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Dec;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001640.
5
Hospital Mortality and Resource Implications of Hospitalisation with COVID-19 in London, UK: A Prospective Cohort Study.英国伦敦新冠肺炎住院患者的医院死亡率及资源影响:一项前瞻性队列研究
Crit Care Res Pract. 2021 Jan 27;2021:8832660. doi: 10.1155/2021/8832660. eCollection 2021.
6
A survey of moral distress in staff working in intensive care in the UK.英国重症监护室工作人员道德困扰情况调查。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2019 Aug;20(3):196-203. doi: 10.1177/1751143718787753. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
7
Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative.改善复苏决策:一项全信托机构的倡议。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Nov 1;7(4):e000268. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268. eCollection 2018.
8
Escalation-related decision making in acute deterioration: a retrospective case note review.急性病情恶化中与逐步升级相关的决策制定:一项回顾性病例记录审查
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 17;8(8):e022021. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022021.
9
CPR decision-making conversations in the UK: an integrative review.英国的心肺复苏决策对话:一项综合综述。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2019 Mar;9(1):1-11. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2018-001526. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
10
Implementing communication and decision-making interventions directed at goals of care: a theory-led scoping review.实施针对护理目标的沟通与决策干预措施:一项理论导向的范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e017056. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017056.