• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善复苏决策:一项全信托机构的倡议。

Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative.

作者信息

Fadel Michael G, Parekh Krishan, Hayden Paul, Krishnan Priya

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, UK.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Anaesthesia, Medway NHS Foundation Trust, Gillingham, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Nov 1;7(4):e000268. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268
PMID:30515464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6231093/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Treatment escalation plans (TEPs) are important to ensure that every patient has their ceiling of care discussed and documented formally. At Medway Foundation Trust, we introduced TEP forms in September 2016 which are to be completed by the relevant consultant within 24 hours of admission.

AIMS AND METHODS

To evaluate whether TEP forms had been effective at improving escalation planning and whether they had a subsequent impact in do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) decision-making. We carried out three plan-do-study-act cycles over a 2-year period across 100 patients in medicine and surgery.

RESULTS

TEP forms were initially found in 66% (66/100) of the patient notes and 34% (34/100) were completed appropriately. There was a 13% relative improvement in resuscitation decision-making, since the introduction of the TEP forms from November 2015 to January 2017. There was also a 12% reduction in inappropriate referrals to critical care during the same period. We decided to revise the TEP form through extensive collaboration and educate all staff members about the importance of escalation planning. This has led to an improvement in TEP discussion and documentation across the entire trust.

CONCLUSION

TEPs can be an effective way of considering and communicating ceilings of care. They should encourage doctors to consider DNACPR decisions for patients who otherwise would not have been considered, and therefore may help reduce inappropriate referrals to critical care. The higher completion rates of the new form and increased clarity among staff regarding escalation planning should lead to an improvement in patient safety outcomes and communication between all patients and staff members. We believe it would be feasible to implement our user-friendly TEP form across other National Health Service organisations in order to develop a universal TEP form.

摘要

引言

治疗升级计划(TEP)对于确保每位患者的护理上限得到正式讨论和记录非常重要。在梅德韦基金会信托医院,我们于2016年9月引入了TEP表格,相关顾问需在患者入院后24小时内填写完毕。

目的与方法

评估TEP表格在改善升级计划方面是否有效,以及它们对不进行心肺复苏(DNACPR)决策是否有后续影响。我们在两年时间里对100名内科和外科患者进行了三个计划 - 执行 - 研究 - 行动循环。

结果

最初在66%(66/100)的患者病历中发现了TEP表格,其中34%(34/100)填写恰当。自2015年11月至2017年1月引入TEP表格以来,复苏决策方面有13%的相对改善。同期,重症监护病房的不适当转诊也减少了12%。我们决定通过广泛合作修订TEP表格,并向所有工作人员宣传升级计划的重要性。这使得整个信托机构内TEP的讨论和记录得到了改善。

结论

TEP可以是一种考虑和沟通护理上限的有效方式。它们应鼓励医生为那些原本不会被考虑的患者考虑DNACPR决策,因此可能有助于减少重症监护病房的不适当转诊。新表格更高的完成率以及工作人员在升级计划方面的清晰度提高,应会改善患者安全结果以及所有患者与工作人员之间的沟通。我们认为在其他国民保健服务机构推行我们用户友好的TEP表格以制定通用的TEP表格是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/bcdd42d42cb0/bmjoq-2017-000268f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/99ea40e81577/bmjoq-2017-000268f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/9cb23fd9d2a1/bmjoq-2017-000268f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/a9648195a9b0/bmjoq-2017-000268f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/bcdd42d42cb0/bmjoq-2017-000268f04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/99ea40e81577/bmjoq-2017-000268f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/9cb23fd9d2a1/bmjoq-2017-000268f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/a9648195a9b0/bmjoq-2017-000268f03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/03e9/6231093/bcdd42d42cb0/bmjoq-2017-000268f04.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving resuscitation decisions: a trust-wide initiative.改善复苏决策:一项全信托机构的倡议。
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Nov 1;7(4):e000268. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000268. eCollection 2018.
2
Reducing DNACPR complaints to zero: designing and implementing a treatment escalation plan using quality improvement methodology.将“不要尝试心肺复苏”(DNACPR)投诉降至零:运用质量改进方法设计并实施治疗升级计划。
BMJ Open Qual. 2017 Sep 4;6(2):e000011. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2017-000011. eCollection 2017.
3
Improving the visibility and communication of treatment escalation plans in Somerset NHS foundation trust.提高萨默塞特国民保健制度基金会信托中治疗升级计划的可见性和沟通效果。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2022;33(S1):S69-S72. doi: 10.3233/JRS-227027.
4
A Unified Electronic Tool for CPR and Emergency Treatment Escalation Plans Improves Communication and Early Collaborative Decision Making for Acute Hospital Admissions.一种用于心肺复苏和紧急治疗升级计划的统一电子工具可改善急性医院入院患者的沟通和早期协作决策。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2017 Apr 25;6(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u213254.w6626. eCollection 2017.
5
Improving Completion Rates of Treatment Escalation Plan (TEP) in a London Teaching Hospital: A Quality Improvement Study.提高伦敦一家教学医院治疗升级计划(TEP)的完成率:一项质量改进研究。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 26;15(11):e49434. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49434. eCollection 2023 Nov.
6
Implementation of a combined Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Treatment Escalation Plan document in a District General Hospital.在一家区综合医院实施心肺复苏与治疗升级计划文件
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Dec 9;2(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u202653.w1236. eCollection 2014.
7
Implementation of treatment escalation plans in an old age psychiatry inpatient hospital.老年精神病学住院医院中治疗升级计划的实施。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Dec;10(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2021-001640.
8
Quality improvement: treatment escalation plans in oncology.质量改进:肿瘤学中的治疗升级计划。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Apr 18;13(2):e002625. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002625.
9
10
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation documentation: a quality improvement project.不要尝试进行心肺复苏记录:一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 May 31. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2022-004133.

引用本文的文献

1
GPs' views on emergency care treatment plans: an online survey.全科医生对急诊护理治疗计划的看法:一项在线调查。
BJGP Open. 2024 Jul 29;8(2). doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0192. Print 2024 Jul.
2
Intensive care following in-hospital cardiac arrest / periarrest calls-experience from one Scottish hospital.院内心脏骤停/心脏骤停前期呼叫后的重症监护——来自一家苏格兰医院的经验
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Jan 2;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s44158-023-00136-0.
3
Reducing Futile Acute Care Services for Terminally Ill Patients With Cancer: The Dignity Project.

本文引用的文献

1
Resuscitation policy should focus on the patient, not the decision.复苏策略应关注患者,而非决策。
BMJ. 2017 Feb 28;356:j813. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j813.
2
Conversation prior to resuscitation: The new CPR.复苏前的对话:新的心肺复苏术。
Resuscitation. 2016 Feb;99:e3. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
3
Implementation of a combined Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Treatment Escalation Plan document in a District General Hospital.在一家区综合医院实施心肺复苏与治疗升级计划文件
减少癌症终末期患者无效的急性医疗服务:尊严计划。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Nov;17(11):e1794-e1802. doi: 10.1200/OP.20.00922. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
4
Implementation of a weekend ceilings of care intervention in surgical inpatients at a District General Hospital.在一家区综合医院对外科住院患者实施周末护理上限干预措施。
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Dec 2;8(4):e000779. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000779. eCollection 2019.
5
The impact of language on the interpretation of resuscitation clinical care plans by doctors. A mixed methods study.语言对医生解读复苏临床护理计划的影响。一项混合方法研究。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225338. eCollection 2019.
6
Impact of a treatment escalation/limitation plan on non-beneficial interventions and harms in patients during their last admission before in-hospital death, using the Structured Judgment Review Method.采用结构化判断审查方法,研究治疗升级/限制计划对患者在住院死亡前最后一次住院期间的非有益干预措施及伤害的影响。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 31;8(10):e024264. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024264.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Dec 9;2(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u202653.w1236. eCollection 2014.
4
Improving documentation of treatment escalation decisions in acute care.改善急性护理中治疗升级决策的记录。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Aug 21;2(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u200617.w1077. eCollection 2013.
5
Do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a systematic review of the barriers and facilitators of decision-making and implementation.不进行心肺复苏(DNACPR)指令:决策和实施的障碍及促进因素的系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2015 Mar;88:99-113. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.016. Epub 2014 Nov 26.
6
The Universal Form of Treatment Options (UFTO) as an alternative to Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) orders: a mixed methods evaluation of the effects on clinical practice and patient care.通用治疗选择表格(UFTO)作为非心肺复苏(DNACPR)医嘱的替代方案:对临床实践和患者护理影响的混合方法评估。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 4;8(9):e70977. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070977. eCollection 2013.
7
A patient and relative centred evaluation of treatment escalation plans: a replacement for the do-not-resuscitate process.以患者和家属为中心的治疗升级计划评估:替代不复苏流程。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Sep;36(9):518-20. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033977.
8
To what extent should older patients be included in decisions regarding their resuscitation status?
J Med Ethics. 2008 May;34(5):353-6. doi: 10.1136/jme.2007.022681.
9
Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.东部肿瘤协作组的毒性及反应标准。
Am J Clin Oncol. 1982 Dec;5(6):649-55.