相似文献
1
Guiding deidentification forward.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):27-8. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.496526.
2
Deidentification and its discontents: response to the Open Peer Commentaries.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):W1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.507654.
3
More than one binary.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):31-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.494228.
4
Is deidentification sufficient to protect health privacy in research?
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):3-11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.494215.
5
To the barricades!
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):1-2. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.494229.
6
Why deidentification fails research subjects and researchers.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):28-30. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.492892.
7
Gift giving to biobanks.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):33-4. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.507653.
8
Managing patient expectations about deidentification.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):21-3. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.494222.
9
Privacy overkill.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):12-5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.494225.
10
Group compromise: perfect cases make problematic generalizations.
Am J Bioeth. 2010 Sep;10(9):25-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2010.492890.
Zotero 插件