Miles and Shirley Fiterman Center for Digestive Diseases, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
World J Gastroenterol. 2010 Sep 14;16(34):4291-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v16.i34.4291.
To evaluate the ability of contrast-enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) to characterize the nature of peripancreatic collections.
Twenty five patients with peripancreatic collections on CECT and who underwent operative intervention for severe acute pancreatitis were retrospectively studied. The collections were classified into (1) necrosis without frank pus; (2) necrosis with pus; and (3) fluid without necrosis. A blinded radiologist assessed the preoperative CTs of each patient for necrosis and peripancreatic fluid collections. Peripancreatic collections were described in terms of volume, location, number, heterogeneity, fluid attenuation, wall perceptibility, wall enhancement, presence of extraluminal gas, and vascular compromise.
Fifty-four collections were identified at operation, of which 45 (83%) were identified on CECT. Of these, 25/26 (96%) had necrosis without pus, 16/19 (84%) had necrosis with pus, and 4/9 (44%) had fluid without necrosis. Among the study characteristics, fluid heterogeneity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the group with necrosis and pus, compared to the other two groups (94% vs 48% and 25%, P = 0.002 and 0.003, respectively). Among the wall characteristics, irregularity was seen in a greater proportion of collections in the groups with necrosis with and without pus, when compared to the group with fluid without necrosis (88% and 71% vs 25%, P = 0.06 and P < 0.01, respectively). The combination of heterogeneity and presence of extraluminal gas had a specificity and positive likelihood ratio of 92% and 5.9, respectively, in detecting pus.
Most of the peripancreatic collections seen on CECT in patients with severe acute pancreatitis who require operative intervention contain necrotic tissue. CECT has a somewhat limited role in differentiating the different types of collections.
评估增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)在确定胰周积液性质方面的能力。
回顾性分析 25 例因重症急性胰腺炎而行手术干预的胰周积液患者的 CECT 资料。将这些积液分为(1)无明显积脓的坏死组织;(2)积脓的坏死组织;(3)无坏死的液体。一位盲法放射科医生评估了每位患者的术前 CT 检查,以确定是否存在坏死和胰周积液。胰周积液的描述包括体积、位置、数量、异质性、液体衰减值、壁的可识别性、壁的增强程度、是否存在腔外气体以及是否存在血管受累。
手术中共发现 54 个积液,其中 45 个(83%)在 CECT 上得到了识别。其中,25/26(96%)例为无积脓的坏死组织,16/19(84%)例为积脓的坏死组织,4/9(44%)例为无坏死的液体。在研究特征中,与其他两组相比,在坏死伴积脓组中,积液的异质性比例更高(94%比 48%和 25%,P=0.002 和 0.003)。在壁的特征中,与无坏死的液体组相比,在坏死伴或不伴积脓组中,壁的不规则性比例更高(88%和 71%比 25%,P=0.06 和 P<0.01)。异质性和腔外气体共存的组合在检测积脓时具有 92%的特异性和 5.9 的阳性似然比。
在需要手术干预的重症急性胰腺炎患者中,CECT 上可见的大多数胰周积液含有坏死组织。CECT 在区分不同类型的积液方面作用有限。