N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):930-42. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0909475.
Clopidogrel and aspirin are widely used for patients with acute coronary syndromes and those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, evidence-based guidelines for dosing have not been established for either agent.
We randomly assigned, in a 2-by-2 factorial design, 25,086 patients with an acute coronary syndrome who were referred for an invasive strategy to either double-dose clopidogrel (a 600-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by 150 mg daily for 6 days and 75 mg daily thereafter) or standard-dose clopidogrel (a 300-mg loading dose and 75 mg daily thereafter) and either higher-dose aspirin (300 to 325 mg daily) or lower-dose aspirin (75 to 100 mg daily). The primary outcome was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 30 days.
The primary outcome occurred in 4.2% of patients assigned to double-dose clopidogrel as compared with 4.4% assigned to standard-dose clopidogrel (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.30). Major bleeding occurred in 2.5% of patients in the double-dose group and in 2.0% in the standard-dose group (hazard ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.46; P=0.01). Double-dose clopidogrel was associated with a significant reduction in the secondary outcome of stent thrombosis among the 17,263 patients who underwent PCI (1.6% vs. 2.3%; hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.85; P=0.001). There was no significant difference between higher-dose and lower-dose aspirin with respect to the primary outcome (4.2% vs. 4.4%; hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.09; P=0.61) or major bleeding (2.3% vs. 2.3%; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.17; P=0.90).
In patients with an acute coronary syndrome who were referred for an invasive strategy, there was no significant difference between a 7-day, double-dose clopidogrel regimen and the standard-dose regimen, or between higher-dose aspirin and lower-dose aspirin, with respect to the primary outcome of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. (Funded by Sanofi-Aventis and Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00335452.)
氯吡格雷和阿司匹林广泛用于急性冠状动脉综合征患者和接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者。然而,对于这两种药物,尚无基于证据的剂量指南。
我们以 2×2 析因设计,随机分配 25086 例急性冠状动脉综合征患者,这些患者被推荐采用侵袭性策略,分别接受双倍剂量氯吡格雷(第 1 天给予 600mg 负荷剂量,随后 6 天每天给予 150mg,此后每天给予 75mg)或标准剂量氯吡格雷(给予 300mg 负荷剂量,此后每天给予 75mg),以及高剂量阿司匹林(每天 300 至 325mg)或低剂量阿司匹林(每天 75 至 100mg)。主要结局为 30 天内心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中。
与标准剂量氯吡格雷组(4.4%)相比,接受双倍剂量氯吡格雷组的主要结局发生率为 4.2%(风险比,0.94;95%置信区间[CI],0.83 至 1.06;P=0.30)。在双倍剂量组中,大出血发生率为 2.5%,在标准剂量组中为 2.0%(风险比,1.24;95%CI,1.05 至 1.46;P=0.01)。在接受 PCI 的 17263 例患者中,双倍剂量氯吡格雷与支架血栓形成的次要结局显著相关(1.6%比 2.3%;风险比,0.68;95%CI,0.55 至 0.85;P=0.001)。高剂量阿司匹林与低剂量阿司匹林相比,主要结局(4.2%比 4.4%;风险比,0.97;95%CI,0.86 至 1.09;P=0.61)或大出血(2.3%比 2.3%;风险比,0.99;95%CI,0.84 至 1.17;P=0.90)无显著差异。
在接受侵袭性策略的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中,7 天双倍剂量氯吡格雷方案与标准剂量方案、高剂量阿司匹林与低剂量阿司匹林相比,在心血管死亡、心肌梗死或卒中的主要结局方面无显著差异。(由赛诺菲-安万特和百时美施贵宝资助;ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号,NCT00335452。)