Suppr超能文献

阿那曲唑和来曲唑:生活质量和耐受性的调查与比较。

Anastrozole and letrozole: an investigation and comparison of quality of life and tolerability.

机构信息

Edinburgh Breast Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU, UK.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Feb;125(3):741-9. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1091-9. Epub 2010 Sep 7.

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that both anastrozole and letrozole are well tolerated. Letrozole suppresses estrogen to a greater degree than anastrozole in the serum and breast tumor. Concerns have been raised that greater potency may adversely affect patients' quality of life (QOL). One hundred eighty-one postmenopausal women with invasive estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers were randomized to receive either 12 weeks of letrozole followed by 12 weeks of anastrozole or the reverse sequence. One hundred and six received immediate adjuvant aromatase inhibitors (AIs) following surgery, and 75 received extended adjuvant therapy. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Endocrine Subscale (FACT-B-ES) QOL questionnaires were completed to assess QOL on each drug. Additional side-effect profiles were collected. Each patient completed a patient preference form. Twenty-one patients withdrew before study end, 10/179 (5.6%) while taking letrozole and 4/173 (2.3%) while taking anastrozole (P = 0.12). Tamoxifen-naïve patients had a higher mean ES (endocrine symptoms subscale) score at entry versus those having extended therapy (66.0 vs. 61.9; P = 0.001). There was no significant change in FACT-B-ES (overall) scores or ES scores while patients were taking anastrozole or letrozole and no significant differences between drugs. Nearly 80% of patients reported one or more side effects with either agent. No differences in frequency, grade, or range of side effects were seen between drugs. Of 160 patients, 49 (30.6%) preferred letrozole, 57 (35.6%) preferred anastrozole, and 54 (33.8%) had no preference (P = 0.26, Pearson's Chi-squared test). In conclusion, both AIs are equally well tolerated. There were no significant differences in QOL scores between the two drugs.

摘要

先前的研究表明,阿那曲唑和来曲唑均具有良好的耐受性。与阿那曲唑相比,来曲唑在血清和乳腺肿瘤中能更有效地抑制雌激素。人们担心更大的效力可能会对患者的生活质量(QOL)产生不利影响。181 名绝经后患有浸润性雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的患者被随机分为接受 12 周来曲唑治疗,然后再接受 12 周阿那曲唑治疗或相反的顺序。106 名患者在手术后立即接受辅助芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)治疗,75 名患者接受了延长辅助治疗。完成功能性评估癌症治疗内分泌子量表(FACT-B-ES)生活质量问卷,以评估每种药物的生活质量。收集了额外的副作用概况。每位患者都填写了一份患者偏好表。21 名患者在研究结束前退出,10/179(5.6%)服用来曲唑,4/173(2.3%)服用阿那曲唑(P=0.12)。与接受延长治疗的患者相比,无他莫昔芬治疗史的患者在入组时的内分泌症状子量表(ES)评分更高(66.0 对 61.9;P=0.001)。当患者服用阿那曲唑或来曲唑时,FACT-B-ES(整体)评分或 ES 评分没有显著变化,两种药物之间也没有显著差异。近 80%的患者报告两种药物均有一个或多个副作用。两种药物的副作用频率、等级或范围没有差异。在 160 名患者中,49 名(30.6%)更喜欢来曲唑,57 名(35.6%)更喜欢阿那曲唑,54 名(33.8%)没有偏好(P=0.26,皮尔逊卡方检验)。总之,两种 AIs 的耐受性均良好。两种药物的生活质量评分无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验