Division of Chemistry & Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637371.
Anal Chem. 2010 Oct 1;82(19):8367-70. doi: 10.1021/ac101996m.
This report compares the electroanalytical performances of single- (G-SL), few- (G-FL), and multilayer graphene (G-ML), graphite microparticles, and edge-plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes in terms of sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability. We show that in the case of differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) detection of ascorbic acid, the sensitivity of a G-SL electrode is about 30% greater than that of G-ML and about 40% greater than graphite microparticles. However, in the case of DPV determination of uric acid, sensitivity is practically the same for all (G-SL, G-FL, and G-ML) and, importantly, the graphite microparticles do provide higher sensitivity than graphenes do for this analyte. Graphenes also do not provide a significant advantage in terms of repeatability. We pose the question of whether the efforts leading to the bulk method of producing single-layer graphene are justified for electroanalytical applications.
本报告比较了单层(G-SL)、少层(G-FL)和多层石墨烯(G-ML)、石墨微粒和边缘平面热解石墨电极在灵敏度、线性和重现性方面的电化学分析性能。我们表明,在使用差分脉冲伏安法(DPV)检测抗坏血酸时,G-SL 电极的灵敏度比 G-ML 高约 30%,比石墨微粒高约 40%。然而,在使用 DPV 测定尿酸时,所有(G-SL、G-FL 和 G-ML)的灵敏度实际上相同,重要的是,对于这种分析物,石墨微粒提供的灵敏度高于石墨烯。石墨烯在重现性方面也没有显著优势。我们提出了一个问题,即对于电分析应用,生产单层石墨烯的大规模方法是否值得付出努力。