Suppr超能文献

单层、少数层和多层石墨烯在电分析中没有表现出明显优于石墨微粒的优势。

Single-, few-, and multilayer graphene not exhibiting significant advantages over graphite microparticles in electroanalysis.

机构信息

Division of Chemistry & Biological Chemistry, School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, 21 Nanyang Link, Singapore 637371.

出版信息

Anal Chem. 2010 Oct 1;82(19):8367-70. doi: 10.1021/ac101996m.

Abstract

This report compares the electroanalytical performances of single- (G-SL), few- (G-FL), and multilayer graphene (G-ML), graphite microparticles, and edge-plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes in terms of sensitivity, linearity, and repeatability. We show that in the case of differential pulse voltammetric (DPV) detection of ascorbic acid, the sensitivity of a G-SL electrode is about 30% greater than that of G-ML and about 40% greater than graphite microparticles. However, in the case of DPV determination of uric acid, sensitivity is practically the same for all (G-SL, G-FL, and G-ML) and, importantly, the graphite microparticles do provide higher sensitivity than graphenes do for this analyte. Graphenes also do not provide a significant advantage in terms of repeatability. We pose the question of whether the efforts leading to the bulk method of producing single-layer graphene are justified for electroanalytical applications.

摘要

本报告比较了单层(G-SL)、少层(G-FL)和多层石墨烯(G-ML)、石墨微粒和边缘平面热解石墨电极在灵敏度、线性和重现性方面的电化学分析性能。我们表明,在使用差分脉冲伏安法(DPV)检测抗坏血酸时,G-SL 电极的灵敏度比 G-ML 高约 30%,比石墨微粒高约 40%。然而,在使用 DPV 测定尿酸时,所有(G-SL、G-FL 和 G-ML)的灵敏度实际上相同,重要的是,对于这种分析物,石墨微粒提供的灵敏度高于石墨烯。石墨烯在重现性方面也没有显著优势。我们提出了一个问题,即对于电分析应用,生产单层石墨烯的大规模方法是否值得付出努力。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验